Skip to main content
Log in

MOG-IgG testing strategies in accordance with the 2023 MOGAD criteria: a clinical-laboratory assessment

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Live cell-based assay (LCBA) is the gold standard for MOG-IgG detection, and fixed CBA (FCBA) is a widely used commercial alternative. Recent criteria attributed a diagnostic value to MOG-IgG titration with both LCBA and FCBA, with low-titre samples requiring additional supporting features for MOGAD diagnosis. However, FCBA titration is not validated. We aimed to assess the impact of the criteria-based MOG-IgG testing in MOGAD diagnosis.

Methods

Thirty-eight serum samples of LCBA MOG-IgG1-positive MOGAD patients were titred on MOG-IgG LCBA and FCBA, and the presence of supporting features for MOGAD assessed. MOGAD criteria were evaluated in four testing scenarios: (a) FCBA without titration; (b) FCBA with titration; c) LCBA without titration; (d) LCBA with titration.

Results

FCBA without titration failed to reach MOGAD diagnosis in 11/38 patients (28.9%, negative results in 5, lack of supporting features in 6). Patients with unconfirmed diagnosis had optic neuritis (ON, n = 8), or transverse myelitis (TM, n = 3). FCBA with titration allowed MOGAD diagnosis in 4 additional patients. Correlation between LCBA and FCBA titres was moderate (Spearman’s rho 0.6, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

FCBA yields high rate of misdiagnosis mainly due a lower analytical sensitivity. FCBA titration provides a moderate diagnostic advantage in FCBA positive patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data availability

Raw data are available at the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10067022).

References

  1. Reindl M et al (2020) International multicenter examination of MOG antibody assays. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(2):e674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Banwell B et al (2023) Diagnosis of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: international MOGAD Panel proposed criteria. Lancet Neurol 22:268–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Waters PJ et al (2019) A multicenter comparison of MOG-IgG cell-based assays. Neurology 92:E1250–E1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sechi E et al (2021) Positive predictive value of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody testing. JAMA Neurol 78:741–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gastaldi M et al (2020) Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study. J Neurol 267:3555–3564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marignier R et al (2021) Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Lancet Neurol 20:762–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, 'Ricerca Corrente' Grant to the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (code RC22012B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Gastaldi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

MG and DF perform MOG assays for diagnostic purposes. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The current project has been approved by the local ethics review board (IRCCS San Matteo, code: 0020308/23).

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent for participation.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1679 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Risi, M., Greco, G., Masciocchi, S. et al. MOG-IgG testing strategies in accordance with the 2023 MOGAD criteria: a clinical-laboratory assessment. J Neurol 271, 2840–2843 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12180-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12180-z

Keywords

Navigation