Abstract
Background
The present study aimed at deriving equating norms to estimate scores on the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) based on those on the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™) in an Italian cohort of non-demented ALS patients.
Methods
ALS-CBS™ and ECAS scores of 293 ALS patients without frontotemporal dementia were retrospectively retrieved. Concurrent validity of the ALS-CBS™ towards the ECAS was tested by covarying for demographics, disease duration and severity, presence of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion and behavioural features. A linear-smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE) model was employed to derive ALS-CBS™-to-ECAS cross-walks. Gaps in LSEE-based estimation were managed via a linear regression-based equating approach. Equivalence between empirical and derived ECAS scores was tested via a two-one-sided test (TOST) procedure for the dependent sample.
Results
The ALS-CBS™ predicted the ECAS (β = 0.75), accounting for the vast majority of its variance (60% out of an R2 = 0.71). Consistently, a strong, one-to-one linear association between ALS-CBS™ and ECAS scores was detected (r = 0.84; R2 = 0.73). The LSEE was able to estimate conversions for the full range of the ALS-CBS™, except for raw scores equal to 1 and 6 – for whom a linear equating-based equation was derived. Empirical ECAS scores were equivalent to those derived with both methods.
Discussion
Italian practitioners and researchers have been herewith provided with valid, straightforward cross-walks to estimate the ECAS based on ALS-CBS™ scores in non-demented ALS patients. Conversions herewith provided will help avoid cross-sectional/longitudinal inconsistencies in test adoption within research, and possibly clinical, settings.
Data availability
Datasets associated with the present study are available, upon reasonable request of interested researchers to the Corresponding Author, at the following link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898435.
References
Strong MJ, Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Woolley S, Mclaughlin P, Snowden J et al (2017) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 18(3–4):153–174
Huynh W, Ahmed R, Mahoney CJ, Nguyen C, Tu S, Caga J et al (2020) The impact of cognitive and behavioral impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 20(3):281–293
Beswick E, Park E, Wong C, Mehta AR, Dakin R, Chandran S et al (2021) A systematic review of neuropsychiatric and cognitive assessments used in clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 268:4510–4521
Woolley SC, York MK, Moore DH, Strutt AM, Murphy J, Schulz PE et al (2010) Detecting frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS: utility of the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™). Amyotroph Lateral Scler 11(3):303–311
Abrahams S, Newton J, Niven E, Foley J, Bak TH (2014) Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 15(1–2):9–14
Gosselt IK, Nijboer TC, Van Es MA (2020) An overview of screening instruments for cognition and behavior in patients with ALS: selecting the appropriate tool for clinical practice. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 21(5–6):324–336
Hlavka JP, Kinoshita AT, Fang S, Hunt A (2021) Clinical outcome measure crosswalks in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 83(2):591–608
Aiello EN, Pasotti F, Appollonio I, Bolognini N (2022) Equating Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores: conversion norms from a healthy Italian population sample. Aging Clin Exp Res 34(7):1721–1724
Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1(5):293–299
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J et al (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134(9):2456–2477
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF et al (2011) Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76(11):1006–1014
Tremolizzo L, Lizio A, Santangelo G, Diamanti S, Lunetta C, Gerardi F et al (2020) ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS): normative values for the Italian population and clinical usability. Neurol Sci 41:835–841
Poletti B, Solca F, Carelli L, Madotto F, Lafronza A, Faini A et al (2016) The validation of the Italian Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural ALS screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 17(7–8):489–498
Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B et al (1999) The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. J Neurol Sci 169(1–2):13–21
Poletti B, Aiello EN, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L, Ferrucci R et al (2023) Diagnostic properties of the Italian ECAS Carer Interview (ECAS-CI). Neurol Sci 44(3):941–946
Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ (2012) What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol 259:2681–2694
Kolen MJ, Brennan RL (2013) Test equating: Methods and practices. Springer Science & Business Media
Livingston SA (1993) Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. J Educ Meas 30(1):23–39
Lakens D (2017) Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 8(4):355–362
Greco LC, Lizio A, Casiraghi J, Sansone VA, Tremolizzo L, Riva N et al (2022) A preliminary comparison between ECAS and ALS-CBS in classifying cognitive–behavioural phenotypes in a cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Neurol 269(4):1899–1904
Aiello EN, Greco LC, La Tona A, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L et al (2023) Clinimetrics of the cognitive section of the Italian ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™). Neurol Sci 44(4):1243–1249
Poletti B, Solca F, Carelli L, Faini A, Madotto F, Lafronza A et al (2018) Cognitive-behavioral longitudinal assessment in ALS: the Italian Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 19(5–6):387–395
Aiello EN, Iazzolino B, Pain D, Peotta L, Palumbo F, Radici A et al (2022) The diagnostic value of the Italian version of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 23(7–8):527–531
Aiello EN, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L, Monti A, Ferrucci R et al (2023) Reliable change indices for the Italian Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 24(3–4):339–342
Acknowledgements
The Authors are thankful to patients and their caregivers.
Funding
This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (Ricerca Corrente, project 23C302). This research was also partially supported by the Ricerca Corrente funding scheme of the Italian Ministry of Health to Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ENA: conceptualization, analyses, drafting, revision; FS, LCG: data collection, drafting, revision; ST, LC, CM, AD, EC, SM, DP, AR, AL, JC, FC: data collection, revision; SW, JM, LT, IA, FV, VAS, CL, VS, NT: resources, revision; BP: conceptualization, drafting, revision, resources.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
V. S. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from AveXis, Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, Liquidweb S.r.l., and Novartis Pharma AG, receives or has received research support from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA, and E-Rare Joint Transnational Call. He is on the Editorial Board of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, European Neurology, American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Frontiers in Neurology. B.P. and L.C. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Liquidweb S.r.l. B.P is Associate Editor for Frontier in Neuroscience. N. T. received compensation for consulting services from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and Zambon Biotech SA. He is Associate Editor for Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. C.L. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Europe. He is Associate Editor for Frontiers in Neurology. V.A.S. participates in Advisory Boards or teaching activities for Biogen, Roche, Avexis, PTC, Santhera, Sarepta, Dyne. S.W. receives licensing fees when the ALS Cognitive Behavioural Screen (ALS-CBS™) is used in pharmaceutical trials. J.M. is employed full time at Biogen; she does not receives compensations related to the ALS-CBS™. Remaining Authors have nothing to declare.
Ethics
participants provided informed consent and data were treated according to current regulations. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (I.D.: 2013_06_25), by the Ethics Committee of Milano Niguarda Area 3 (I.D.: 393-09062021) and by the Ethics Committee of Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (I.D.: CE 2495-12012021).
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiello, E.N., Solca, F., Greco, L.C. et al. Equating norms between the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™) and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) in non-demented ALS patients. J Neurol 270, 4090–4095 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11749-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11749-4