Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Equating norms between the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™) and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) in non-demented ALS patients

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed at deriving equating norms to estimate scores on the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) based on those on the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™) in an Italian cohort of non-demented ALS patients.

Methods

ALS-CBS™ and ECAS scores of 293 ALS patients without frontotemporal dementia were retrospectively retrieved. Concurrent validity of the ALS-CBS™ towards the ECAS was tested by covarying for demographics, disease duration and severity, presence of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion and behavioural features. A linear-smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE) model was employed to derive ALS-CBS™-to-ECAS cross-walks. Gaps in LSEE-based estimation were managed via a linear regression-based equating approach. Equivalence between empirical and derived ECAS scores was tested via a two-one-sided test (TOST) procedure for the dependent sample.

Results

The ALS-CBS™ predicted the ECAS (β = 0.75), accounting for the vast majority of its variance (60% out of an R2 = 0.71). Consistently, a strong, one-to-one linear association between ALS-CBS™ and ECAS scores was detected (r = 0.84; R2 = 0.73). The LSEE was able to estimate conversions for the full range of the ALS-CBS™, except for raw scores equal to 1 and 6 – for whom a linear equating-based equation was derived. Empirical ECAS scores were equivalent to those derived with both methods.

Discussion

Italian practitioners and researchers have been herewith provided with valid, straightforward cross-walks to estimate the ECAS based on ALS-CBS™ scores in non-demented ALS patients. Conversions herewith provided will help avoid cross-sectional/longitudinal inconsistencies in test adoption within research, and possibly clinical, settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data availability

Datasets associated with the present study are available, upon reasonable request of interested researchers to the Corresponding Author, at the following link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898435.

References

  1. Strong MJ, Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Woolley S, Mclaughlin P, Snowden J et al (2017) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 18(3–4):153–174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Huynh W, Ahmed R, Mahoney CJ, Nguyen C, Tu S, Caga J et al (2020) The impact of cognitive and behavioral impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 20(3):281–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beswick E, Park E, Wong C, Mehta AR, Dakin R, Chandran S et al (2021) A systematic review of neuropsychiatric and cognitive assessments used in clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 268:4510–4521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woolley SC, York MK, Moore DH, Strutt AM, Murphy J, Schulz PE et al (2010) Detecting frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS: utility of the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™). Amyotroph Lateral Scler 11(3):303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrahams S, Newton J, Niven E, Foley J, Bak TH (2014) Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 15(1–2):9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosselt IK, Nijboer TC, Van Es MA (2020) An overview of screening instruments for cognition and behavior in patients with ALS: selecting the appropriate tool for clinical practice. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 21(5–6):324–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hlavka JP, Kinoshita AT, Fang S, Hunt A (2021) Clinical outcome measure crosswalks in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 83(2):591–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aiello EN, Pasotti F, Appollonio I, Bolognini N (2022) Equating Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores: conversion norms from a healthy Italian population sample. Aging Clin Exp Res 34(7):1721–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1(5):293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J et al (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134(9):2456–2477

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF et al (2011) Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76(11):1006–1014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tremolizzo L, Lizio A, Santangelo G, Diamanti S, Lunetta C, Gerardi F et al (2020) ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS): normative values for the Italian population and clinical usability. Neurol Sci 41:835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poletti B, Solca F, Carelli L, Madotto F, Lafronza A, Faini A et al (2016) The validation of the Italian Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural ALS screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 17(7–8):489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B et al (1999) The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. J Neurol Sci 169(1–2):13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poletti B, Aiello EN, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L, Ferrucci R et al (2023) Diagnostic properties of the Italian ECAS Carer Interview (ECAS-CI). Neurol Sci 44(3):941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ (2012) What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol 259:2681–2694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolen MJ, Brennan RL (2013) Test equating: Methods and practices. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  18. Livingston SA (1993) Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. J Educ Meas 30(1):23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lakens D (2017) Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 8(4):355–362

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Greco LC, Lizio A, Casiraghi J, Sansone VA, Tremolizzo L, Riva N et al (2022) A preliminary comparison between ECAS and ALS-CBS in classifying cognitive–behavioural phenotypes in a cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Neurol 269(4):1899–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aiello EN, Greco LC, La Tona A, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L et al (2023) Clinimetrics of the cognitive section of the Italian ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™). Neurol Sci 44(4):1243–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poletti B, Solca F, Carelli L, Faini A, Madotto F, Lafronza A et al (2018) Cognitive-behavioral longitudinal assessment in ALS: the Italian Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 19(5–6):387–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aiello EN, Iazzolino B, Pain D, Peotta L, Palumbo F, Radici A et al (2022) The diagnostic value of the Italian version of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 23(7–8):527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aiello EN, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L, Monti A, Ferrucci R et al (2023) Reliable change indices for the Italian Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 24(3–4):339–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors are thankful to patients and their caregivers.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (Ricerca Corrente, project 23C302). This research was also partially supported by the Ricerca Corrente funding scheme of the Italian Ministry of Health to Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ENA: conceptualization, analyses, drafting, revision; FS, LCG: data collection, drafting, revision; ST, LC, CM, AD, EC, SM, DP, AR, AL, JC, FC: data collection, revision; SW, JM, LT, IA, FV, VAS, CL, VS, NT: resources, revision; BP: conceptualization, drafting, revision, resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Poletti.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

V. S. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from AveXis, Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, Liquidweb S.r.l., and Novartis Pharma AG, receives or has received research support from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA, and E-Rare Joint Transnational Call. He is on the Editorial Board of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, European Neurology, American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Frontiers in Neurology. B.P. and L.C. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Liquidweb S.r.l. B.P is Associate Editor for Frontier in Neuroscience. N. T. received compensation for consulting services from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and Zambon Biotech SA. He is Associate Editor for Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. C.L. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Europe. He is Associate Editor for Frontiers in Neurology. V.A.S. participates in Advisory Boards or teaching activities for Biogen, Roche, Avexis, PTC, Santhera, Sarepta, Dyne. S.W. receives licensing fees when the ALS Cognitive Behavioural Screen (ALS-CBS™) is used in pharmaceutical trials. J.M. is employed full time at Biogen; she does not receives compensations related to the ALS-CBS™. Remaining Authors have nothing to declare.

Ethics

participants provided informed consent and data were treated according to current regulations. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (I.D.: 2013_06_25), by the Ethics Committee of Milano Niguarda Area 3 (I.D.: 393-09062021) and by the Ethics Committee of Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (I.D.: CE 2495-12012021).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aiello, E.N., Solca, F., Greco, L.C. et al. Equating norms between the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™) and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) in non-demented ALS patients. J Neurol 270, 4090–4095 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11749-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11749-4

Keywords

Navigation