Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative clinical and radiological recovery in post-operative patients with superficial siderosis by an iron chelator

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Superficial siderosis is a rare neurodegenerative disease caused by hemosiderin deposition on the brain surface. Although the efficacy of the iron chelator—deferiprone—in superficial siderosis has recently been documented, a comparative study of patients who underwent surgical ablation of their bleeding source and subsequently received treatment with or without deferiprone has not yet been conducted.

Methods

Fifteen postoperative patients with superficial siderosis were recruited, and seven patients were administered deferiprone (combination therapy group). Quantitative changes in the hypointense signals on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance images were acquired; additionally, cerebellar ataxia was assessed (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale score and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia). Audiometry was performed and the results were compared with those of patients who did not receive deferiprone (surgical treatment group; controls).

Results

Significant improvements in signal contrast ratios were noted in the lateral orbitofrontal gyrus, superior temporal lobe, insular lobe, brainstem, lingual gyrus, and cerebellar lobe in the combination therapy group. The scores of patients in the combination therapy group on the cerebellar ataxia scales significantly improved. The degree of signal improvement in the cerebellar lobe correlated with the improvement of cerebellar ataxia scores. Early deferiprone administration after disease onset and long-term administration were correlated with greater signal improvements on magnetic resonance imaging. No adverse effects were observed in the clinical or laboratory parameters.

Conclusions

Deferiprone administration significantly improved radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with postoperative superficial siderosis. Earlier and longer courses of deferiprone could result in better patient prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data sharing statement

Anonymized data are presented as supplementary data.

References

  1. Kumar N, Cohen-Gadol AA, Wright RA et al (2006) Superficial siderosis. Neurology 66:1144–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy M, Turtzo C, Llinas RH (2007) Superficial siderosis: a case report and review of the literature. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 3:54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hosokawa M, Murata KY, Hironishi M et al (2018) Superficial siderosis associated with duplicated dura mater detected by CISS reverse MRI. J Neurol Sci 392:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arishima H, Higashino Y, Yamada M et al (2018) Spinal endoscopy combined with selective CT myelography for dural closure of the spinal dural defect with superficial siderosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 28:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson D, Chatterjee F, Farmer SF et al (2017) Infratentorial superficial siderosis: classification, diagnostic criteria, and rational investigation pathway. Ann Neurol 81:333–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredenburg AM, Sethi RK, Allen DD, Yokel RA (1996) The pharmacokinetics and blood-brain barrier permeation of the chelators 1,2 dimethly-, 1,2 diethyl-, and 1-[ethan-1’ol]-2-methyl-3-hydroxypyridine-4-one in the rat. Toxicology 108:191–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozaki K, Sanjo N, Ishikawa K et al (2015) Elevation of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine in the cerebrospinal fluid of three patients with superficial siderosis. Neurol Clin Neurosci 3:108–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon SJ, Stockwell BR (2014) The role of iron and reactive oxygen species in cell death. Nat Chem Biol 10:9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Masaldan S, Bush AI, Devos D et al (2019) Striking while the iron is hot: Iron metabolism and ferroptosis in neurodegeneration. Free Radic Biol Med 133:221–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy M, Llinas RH (2011) Deferiprone reduces hemosiderin deposits in the brain of a patient with superficial siderosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:E1-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy M, Llinas RH (2012) Update on a patient with superficial siderosis on deferiprone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:E99-100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Levy M, Llinas R (2012) Pilot safety trial of deferiprone in 10 subjects with superficial siderosis. Stroke 43:120–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huprikar N, Gossweiler M, Callaghan M, Bunge P (2013) Agranulocytosis with deferiprone treatment of superficial siderosis. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-010099

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cummins G, Crundwell G, Baguley D, Lennox G (2013) Treatment of superficial siderosis with iron chelation therapy. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009916

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kessler RA, Li X, Schwartz K et al (2018) Two-year observational study of deferiprone in superficial siderosis. CNS Neurosci Ther 24:187–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuo P-H, Kuo S-H, Lo RY (2017) Deferiprone reduces hemosiderin deposition in superficial siderosis. Can J Neurol Sci 44:219–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schirinzi T, Sancesario G, Anemona L et al (2014) CSF biomarkers in superficial siderosis: a new tool for diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of deferiprone—a case report. Neurol Sci 35:1151–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levy M (2019) Ten years of iron chelation in a patient with superficial siderosis. Neurol Sci 40:1947–1949

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cossu G, Abbruzzese G, Forni GL et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of deferiprone for the treatment of superficial siderosis: results from a long-term observational study. Neurol Sci 40:1357–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derle E (2018) Iron chelation in treatment of superficial siderosis. Iran J Neurol 17:195–196

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Klopstock T, Tricta F, Neumayr L et al (2019) Safety and efficacy of deferiprone for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial and an open-label extension study. Lancet Neurol 18:631–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Devos D, Cabantchik ZI, Moreau C et al (2020) Conservative iron chelation for neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neural Transm 127:189–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreau C, Danel V, Devedjian JC et al (2018) Could conservative iron chelation lead to neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Antioxid Redox Signal 29:742–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Egawa S, Yoshii T, Sakaki K et al (2013) Dural closure for the treatment of superficial siderosis. J Neurosurg Spine 18:388–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashburner J (2012) SPM: A history. Neuroimage 62:791–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takeda T, Kawashima Y, Hirai C et al (2018) Vestibular dysfunction in patients with superficial siderosis of the central nervous system. Otol Neurotol 39:e468-474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Posti JP, Juvela S, Parkkola R, Roine S (2011) Three cases of superficial siderosis of the central nervous system and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir 153:2067–2073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cabantchik ZI (2014) Labile iron in cells and body fluids: physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Front Pharmacol 5:45–45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nandigam RN, Viswanathan A, Delgado P et al (2009) MR imaging detection of cerebral microbleeds: effect of susceptibility-weighted imaging, section thickness, and field strength. Am J Neuroradiol 30:338–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Westwood MA, Anderson LJ, Firmin DN et al (2003) Interscanner reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance T2* measurements of tissue iron in thalassemia. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:616–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Westwood MA, Firmin DN, Gildo M et al (2005) Intercentre reproducibility of magnetic resonance T2* measurements of myocardial iron in thalassemia. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:531–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanner M, He T, Westwood M et al (2006) Multi-center validation of the transferability of the magnetic resonance T2* technique for the quantification of tissue iron. Haematologica 91:1388–1391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramazzotti A, Pepe A, Positano V et al (2009) Multicenter validation of the magnetic resonance T2* technique for segmental and global quantification of myocardial iron. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kirk P, He T, Anderson LJ et al (2010) International reproducibility of single breathhold T2* MR for cardiac and liver iron assessment among five thalassemia centers. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:315–319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Meloni A, De Marchi D, Pistoia L et al (2019) Multicenter validation of the magnetic resonance T2* technique for quantification of pancreatic iron. Eur Radiol 29:2246–2252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Takamori Takeda and Takeshi Tsutsumi of the Department of Otolaryngology at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) for performing auditory evaluation tests, Drs. Toshitaka Yoshii and Atsushi Okawa of the Department of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery at TMDU for surgical treatments, as well as the patients with superficial siderosis and their family members for providing important clinical information.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YN analyzed the data and wrote the draft. I. Uwano analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. UT acquired the data and revised the manuscript. MS analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. TY supervised the study and revised the manuscript. NS designed the study, acquired the data, wrote, and finalized the manuscript, and coordinated and supervised the research. All authors critically read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Takanori Yokota or Nobuo Sanjo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The protocol followed all ethical requirements and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (ID: R2018-026); written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down by the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

415_2021_10844_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Figure S1. Signal reduction of MRI hypointensity signals in T2*-weighted MR images in the combination therapy group. Axial views of T2*-weighted MR images before (figure on the left in each panel) and after (figure on the right in each panel) deferiprone administration in the combination therapy group. White arrows and arrowheads indicate brain areas showing significant signal reduction on MR images, which were quantitatively confirmed following deferiprone administration in the brainstem (arrowheads), cerebellar lobe (arrows) (A), superior temporal lobe (arrows), lateral orbitofrontal gyrus (arrowheads) (B), and lingual gyrus (arrows) (C). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MR, magnetic resonance

415_2021_10844_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Figure S2. Signal deterioration of MRI hypointensity in the surgical treatment group. Axial views of T2*-weighted MR images before (figure on the left in each panel) and after (figure on the right in each panel) the observational period in the surgical treatment group. Arrows and arrowheads indicate significant signal increase in hypointensity on T2*-weighted MR images, which was quantitatively confirmed in the cerebellar lobe (arrows) (A), inferior occipital lobe (arrows) (B), hippocampus (arrows) (C), fusiform (arrows) (D), lingual gyrus (arrows), superior temporal lobe (arrowheads), insular lobe (black arrowheads) (E), cuneus (arrows), cingulate gyrus (arrowheads) (F), and precuneus (arrows) (G). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

415_2021_10844_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Figure S3. Clinical severity changes in cerebellar ataxia and hearing ability in the combination therapy and surgical treatment groups. The score reduction of ICARS (A) indicates clinical recovery in all patients in the CG, and the score reduction of SARA (B) indicates clinical recovery in all patients except one. Of the patients in the SG, 5/6 showed an increase in the ICARS score (A), and 3/5 showed an increase in the SARA score (B). A relatively stable hearing threshold was observed in patients in the CG (C). ICAR, International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale; SARA, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia; CG, combination therapy group; SG, surgical treatment group

415_2021_10844_MOESM4_ESM.tif

Figure S4. Spearman’s rank correlation between the change in hypointensities on T2*-weighted MR images and background factors of participants. The vertical line shows the hypointense signal change ratio (A-D, ([CR at F/U – CR at baseline] / interval period of MRI scans (years)) and the degree of change in the hypointense signal (E, CR at F/U – CR at baseline) on T2*-weighted MR images, and the horizontal line shows the number of months. The hypointense signal change ratio on T2*-weighted MR images correlated with the duration between disease onset and administration in the fusiform (A), inferior occipital lobe (B), lingual gyrus (C), and cingulate gyrus (D). The degree of change in the hypointense signal in the parahippocampal gyrus correlated with the administration period (E). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MR, magnetic resonance; CR, contrast ratio; F/U, follow-up

415_2021_10844_MOESM5_ESM.tif

Figure S5. Significant signal improvement of hypointensity on MRI in the CG (cerebrospinal fluid reference). We compared the degree of hypointense signal change on T2*-weighted MR images of each brain area using signal of cerebrospinal fluid as a reference, in the CG and SG using the Mann–Whitney U test. The vertical axis indicates a signal change and a positive value indicates a decrease in the hypointensity signal (improvement) on T2*-weighted MR images. A significantly increased signal change was achieved by deferiprone administration in the parahippocampal gyrus (A), lingual gyrus (B), cerebellar lobe (C), and brainstem (D) in the CG. CG, combination therapy group; SG, surgical treatment group; MR, magnetic resonance

415_2021_10844_MOESM6_ESM.tif

Figure S6. Clinical recovery of cerebellar ataxia associated with radiological improvement in the cerebellar lobe (cerebrospinal fluid reference). Cerebellar ataxia was evaluated using the ICARS in the CG. The hypointense signal of T2*-weighted MR image was evaluated using signal of cerebrospinal fluid as a reference. The degree of change in ICARS was correlated to the hypointense signal change on T2*-weighted MR images in the cerebellar lobe. I. CARS, International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

415_2021_10844_MOESM7_ESM.tif

Figure S7. Spearman’s rank correlation between the change in hypointensities on T2*-weighted MR images (cerebrospinal fluid reference) and background factors of participants. The vertical line shows the hypointense signal change ratio (A and B, ([CR at F/U – CR at baseline] / interval period of MRI scans (years)) and the degree of change in the hypointense signal (C, CR at F/U – CR at baseline) on T2*-weighted MR images, and the horizontal line shows the number of months. The hypointense signal of T2*-weighted MR image was evaluated using signal of cerebrospinal fluid as a reference. The hypointense signal change ratio on T2*-weighted MR images correlated with the duration between disease onset and administration in the fusiform (A) and cerebellar lobe (B). The degree of change in the hypointense signal in the parahippocampal gyrus correlated with the administration period (C). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MR, magnetic resonance; CR, contrast ratio; F/U, follow-up

Supplementary file8 (DOCX 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nose, Y., Uwano, I., Tateishi, U. et al. Quantitative clinical and radiological recovery in post-operative patients with superficial siderosis by an iron chelator. J Neurol 269, 2539–2548 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10844-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10844-8

Keywords

Navigation