Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of chocolate to cacao-free white chocolate in Parkinson’s disease: a single-dose, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous questionnaire study suggests an increased chocolate consumption in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The cacao ingredient contains caffeine analogues and biogenic amines, such as β-phenylethylamine, with assumed antiparkinsonian effects. We thus tested the effects of 200 g of chocolate containing 80 % of cacao on UPDRS motor score after 1 and 3 h in 26 subjects with moderate non-fluctuating PD in a mono-center, single-dose, investigator-blinded crossover study using cacao-free white chocolate as placebo comparator. At 1 h after chocolate intake, mean UPDRS motor scores were mildly decreased compared to baseline in both treatments with significant results only for dark chocolate [−1.3 (95 % CI 0.18–2.52, RMANOVA F = 4.783, p = 0.013¸ Bonferroni p = 0.021 for 1 h values)]. A 2 × 2-cross-over analysis revealed no significant differences between both treatments [−0.54 ± 0.47 (95 % CI −1.50 to 0.42), p = 0.258]. Similar results were obtained at 3 h after intake. β-phenylethylamine blood levels were unaltered. Together, chocolate did not show significant improvement over white cacao-free chocolate in PD motor function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashihara H, Sano H, Crozier A (2008) Caffeine and related purine alkaloids: biosynthesis, catabolism, function and genetic engineering. Phytochemistry 69:841–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. di Tomaso E, Beltramo M, Piomelli D (1996) Brain cannabinoids in chocolate. Nature 382:677–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahn S, Elton RL, Committee UD (1987) The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, pp 153–163, 293–304

  4. Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Worall H, Keller F (1994) Beck-Depressions-inventar (BDI). Huber Publisher, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes AJ, Lees AJ, Stern GM (1990) Apomorphine test to predict dopaminergic responsiveness in parkinsonian syndromes. Lancet 336:32–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jankovic J (2008) Are adenosine antagonists, such as istradefylline, caffeine, and chocolate, useful in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease? Ann Neurol 63:267–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones B, Kenward MG (2008) Design and analysis of cross-over trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Danvers

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker G, Parker I, Brotchie H (2006) Mood state effects of chocolate. J Affect Disord 92:149–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pastore P, Favaro G, Badocco D, Tapparo A, Cavalli S, Saccani G (2005) Determination of biogenic amines in chocolate by ion chromatographic separation and pulsed integrated amperometric detection with implemented wave-form at Au disposable electrode. J Chromatogr 1098:111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi GA, Qureshi AR, Bergstrom J (1989) Quantitation of free amino acids in plasma and muscle samples in healthy subjects and uremic patients by high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal 7:377–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riederer PF, Burger R (2009) Ist Schokolade ein Psychopharmakon? Die Rolle von ß-Phenylethylamin als Psychostimulus. Psychopharmakotherapie 16:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rusconi M, Conti A (2010) Theobroma cacao L., the food of the gods: a scientific approach beyond myths and claims. Pharmacol Res 61:5–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schrag A, Sampaio C, Counsell N, Poewe W (2006) Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. Mov Disord 21:1200–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shulgin A, Shulgin A (2010) #142 PEA Phenylethylamine. In: PIHKAL Erowid Online Books

  16. Storch A, Jost WH, Vieregge P, Spiegel J, Greulich W, Durner J, Muller T, Kupsch A, Henningsen H, Oertel WH, Fuchs G, Kuhn W, Niklowitz P, Koch R, Herting B, Reichmann H (2007) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on symptomatic effects of coenzyme Q(10) in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 64:938–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarka SM Jr (1982) The toxicology of cocoa and methylxanthines: a review of the literature. Crit Rev Toxicol 9:275–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE (2010) Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 25:2649–2653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolz M, Kaminsky A, Lohle M, Koch R, Storch A, Reichmann H (2009) Chocolate consumption is increased in Parkinson’s disease. Results from a self-questionnaire study. J Neurol 256:488–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their relatives for participation, and Simone Schmidt and Annett Wolz for randomization and administration of the chocolate. Martin Wolz has received honoraria for presentations from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Valeant, MEDA Pharma, Medtronic, TEVA, and UCB Pharma. Christine Schleiffer has nothing to disclose. Lisa Klingelhöfer has received honoraria from Novartis, MEDA Pharma, and Medtronic, and travel funding from Novartis. Christine Schneider has received honoraria for presentations from Boehringer Ingelheim and has received travel funding from Allergan. Florian Proft has nothing to disclose. Uta Schwanebeck has received institutional support by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany). Due to single projects she has received research support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Association), Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Federal Ministry of Health). There were cooperations with onepharm, Austria; Ardeypharm, Germany; Apogepha Dresden, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Germany, and Novartis, Germany. Heinz Reichmann was acting on advisory boards, gave lectures and received research grants from Mwerch Serono, Cephalon, Pfizer, GSK, Boehringer/Ingelheim, Bayer Health Care, UCB Schwarz Pharma, TEVA/Lundbeck, Orion, Novartis, Desitin, and Valeant. Peter Riederer was acting on the advisory board of Merz Pharmaceuticals. Alexander Storch serves as an editorial board member of Stem Cells, Stem Cells International and Open Biotechnology Journals. He has received funding from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germen Research Association), the Roland Ernst-Foundation, the International Parkinson-Foundation, and the research funds of the Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus at the Dresden Faculty of Dresden, and has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, and TEVA/Lundbeck. He has received honoraria for presentations, consultancies or advisory board meetings from the DZNE (German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases), NeuroConsil, GE Health Care, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merz, GlaxoSmithKline, MEDA Pharma, Medtronic, Novartis, Orion, TEVA, Lundbeck, and UCB Pharma.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest and have no financial disclosures to make in respect to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Storch.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolz, M., Schleiffer, C., Klingelhöfer, L. et al. Comparison of chocolate to cacao-free white chocolate in Parkinson’s disease: a single-dose, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Neurol 259, 2447–2451 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6527-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6527-1

Keywords

Navigation