Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of the use of radiographic visibility of root pulp in the mandibular third molar as a maturity marker at age thresholds of 18 and 21

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of the radiographic visibility of root pulp in mandibular third molars has been suggested as an alternative method for estimation of legal age threshold in living individuals when the root apices are mature. Here, we assessed the accuracy of this method for age thresholds of 18 and 21 years. A sample of 463 panoramic radiographs of individuals aged between 16 and 34 years was examined. The root pulp visibility of the mandibular third molars was scored; the stages ranged from 0 to 3. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to select optimal cut-offs for 18- and 21-year-old thresholds. As prognostic predictors, the selected cut-offs were stages 1 and 2 for the 18- and 21-year-old thresholds of both sexes, respectively. For the 18-year-old threshold, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.829, 83.1% and 66.7% in females; and 0.930, 89.4% and 90.9% in males, respectively. For the 21-year-old threshold, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.874, 72.8% and 92.0% in females; and 0.906, 85.5% and 88.2% in males, respectively. The accuracy of the method for estimating the 18- and 21-year-old thresholds ranged from moderate to high. Therefore, the method must be used in conjunction with other age estimation methods, especially to predict whether a female has reached 18 years of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis JM, Senn DR (2013) Dental age estimation. In: Senn DR, Weems RA (eds) Manual of forensic odontology, 5th edn. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 211–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Büken B, Demir F, Büken E (2003) Evaluation of cases sent for age estimation to forensic medicine department between 2001 and 2003 years and difficulties in forensic practice. Düzce Med J 5:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harunoğulları M (2016) Suriyeli sığınmacı çocuk işçiler ve sorunları: Kilis örneği. Göç Derg 3:29–63 (in Turkish)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thevissen PW, Kvaal SI, Dierickx K, Willems G (2012) Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minors. J Forensic Odontostomatol 30(sup. 1):85–102

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jayaraman J, Roberts GJ, Wong HM, McDonald F, King NM (2016) Ages of legal importance: implications in relation to birth registration and age assessment practices. Med Sci Law 56:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802415590172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turkish Penal Code. Law no.: 5237 (2004) Official Gazette 2004; (25611) (in Turkish)

  7. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch H-J, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, Reisinger W, Riepert T, Ritz-Timme S, Rösing FW, Rötzscher K, Geserick G (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y, Lynnerup N, Cattaneo C (2009) The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 193:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Streckbein P, Reichert I, Verhoff MA, Bödeker RH, Kähling C, Willbrand JF, Schaaf H, Howaldt HP, May A (2014) Estimation of legal age using calcification stages of third molars in living individuals. Sci Justice 54:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olze A, Solheim T, Schulz R, Kupfer M, Schmeling A (2010) Evaluation of the radiographic visibility of the root pulp in the lower third molars for the purpose of forensic age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 124:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0415-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olze A, Solheim T, Schulz R, Kupfer M, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2010) Assessment of the radiographic visibility of the periodontal ligament in the lower third molars for the purpose of forensic age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 124:445–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0488-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez-Mongiovi D, Teixeira A, Caldas IM (2015) The radiographic visibility of the root pulp of the third lower molar as an age marker. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9688-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucas VS, McDonald F, Andiappan M, Roberts G (2017) Dental age estimation-root pulp visibility (RPV) patterns: a reliable mandibular maturity marker at the 18 year threshold. Forensic Sci Int 270:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Timme M, Timme WH, Olze A, Ottow C, Ribbecke S, Pfeiffer H, Dettmeyer R, Schmeling A (2017) The chronology of the radiographic visibility of the periodontal ligament and the root pulp in the lower third molars. Sci Justice 57:257–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.03.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo YC, Chu G, Olze A, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Ottow C, Pfeiffer H, Chen T, Schmeling A (2018) Application of age assessment based on the radiographic visibility of the root pulp of lower third molars in a northern Chinese population. Int J Legal Med 132:825–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1731-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sequeira CD, Teixeira A, Caldas IM, Afonso A, Pérez-Mongiovi D (2014) Age estimation using the radiographic visibility of the periodontal ligament in lower third molars in a Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Dent 6:e546–e550. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaudhary MA, Liversidge HM (2017) A radiographic study estimating age of mandibular third molars by periodontal ligament visibility. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goksuluk D, Korkmaz S, Zararsiz G, Karaagaoglu AE (2016) easyROC: an interactive web-tool for ROC curve analysis using R language environment. The R Journal 8(2):213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  20. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3(1):32–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Pediatr 96:487–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00179.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 16:101–117

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T (1995) Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 74:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Solari AC, Abramovitch K (2002) The accuracy and precision of third molar development as an indicator of chronological age in Hispanics. J Forensic Sci 47(3):531–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2004) Forensic age diagnostics of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Forensic Sci Int 144:243–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thevissen PW, Kaur J, Willems G (2012) Human age estimation combining third molar and skeletal development. Int J Legal Med 126(2):285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0639-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Garamendia PM, Landaa MI, Ballesterosb J, Solano MA (2005) Reliability of the methods applied to assess age minority in living subjects around 18 years old a survey on a Moroccan origin population. Forensic Sci Int 154:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinchi V, De Luca F, Focardi M, Pradella F, Vitale G, Ricciardi F, Norelli G-A (2016) Combining dental and skeletal evidence in age classification: pilot study in a sample of Italian sub-adults. Legal Med 20:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M (2004) Variations in pulp/tooth area ratio as an indicator of age: a preliminary study. J Forensic Sci 49:317–319. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Orhan K, Ozer L, Orhan AI, Dogan S, Paksoy CS (2007) Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in relation to chronological age among Turkish children and youth. Forensic Sci Int 165:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mincer H, Harris E, Berryman H (1993) The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 38(2):379–390. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS13418J ISSN 0022-1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Knell B, Ruhstaller P, Prieels F, Schmeling A (2009) Dental age diagnostics by means of radiographical evaluation of the growth stages of lower wisdom teeth. Int J Legal Med 123:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0330-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Olze A, Schmeling A, Taniguchi M, Maeda H, van Niekerk P, Wernecke KD, Geserick G (2004) Forensic age estimation in living subjects: the ethnic factor in wisdom tooth mineralization. Int J Legal Med 118:170–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0434-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Levesque GY, Demirjian A, Tanguay R (1981) Sexual dimorphism in the development, emergence, and agenesis of the mandibular third molar. J Dent Res 60(10):1735–1741. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600100201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nursel Akkaya.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkaya, N., Yılancı, H.Ö., Boyacıoğlu, H. et al. Accuracy of the use of radiographic visibility of root pulp in the mandibular third molar as a maturity marker at age thresholds of 18 and 21. Int J Legal Med 133, 1507–1515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02036-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02036-x

Keywords

Navigation