Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of pellet seating on the external ballistic parameters of spring-piston air guns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In firearm examiners’ and forensic specialists’ casework as well as in air gun proof testing, reliable measurement of the weapon’s muzzle velocity is indispensable. While there are standardized and generally accepted procedures for testing the performance of air guns, the method of seating the diabolo pellets deeper into the breech of break barrel spring-piston air guns has not found its way into standardized test procedures. The influence of pellet seating on the external ballistic parameters was investigated using ten different break barrel spring-piston air guns. Test shots were performed with the diabolo pellets seated 2 mm deeper into the breech using a pellet seater. The results were then compared to reference shots with conventionally loaded diabolo pellets. Projectile velocity was measured with a high-precision redundant ballistic speed measurement system. In eight out of ten weapons, the muzzle energy increased significantly when the pellet seater was used. The average increase in kinetic energy was 31 % (range 9–96 %). To conclude, seating the pellet even slightly deeper into the breech of spring-piston air guns might significantly alter the muzzle energy. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that this effect is taken into account when accurate and reliable measurements of air gun muzzle velocity are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolff F, Laufer M (1965) Tödliche Kopfschußverletzung durch Luftgewehr. Arch Kriminol 137:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bligh-Glover WZ (2012) One-in-a-million shot. A homicidal thoracic air rifle wound, a case report, and a review of the literature. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 33:98–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadabadi MN, Karkhaneh R, Valeshabad AK, Tabatabai A, Jager MJ, Ahmadabadi EN (2011) Clinical presentation and outcome of perforating ocular injuries due to BB guns: a case series. Injury 42:492–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill PJ, Lumpkin MF, Clapp B, Kopelman TR, Matthews MR, Cox JC, Caruso DM, Feiz-Erfan I (2009) Significant pediatric morbidity and mortality from intracranial ballistic injuries caused by nonpowder gunshot wounds. A case series. Pediatr Neurosurg 45:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollak S (1978) Statistik und Phänomenologie kombinierter Selbsttötungen und anderer suizidaler Mehrfachschädigungen im urbanen Bereich (II). Arch Kriminol 161:68–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) (2013). Nonfatal injury reports. http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates2001.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2016

  7. Caunt R (2003) Dieseling of airguns using commonly available fuels. AFTE J 35:167–173

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank M, Schönekeß HC, Grossjohann R, Ekkernkamp A, Bockholdt B (2014) Der “Huckepack”-Schuss: ballistische Parameter doppelt geladener Luftgewehr-Projektile. 233:123–129

  9. Frank M, Schönekeß H, Herbst J, Staats HG, Ekkernkamp A, Nguyen TT, Bockholdt B (2014) Subcaliber discarding sabot airgun projectiles. Int J Legal Med 128:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank M, Schönekeß H, Jäger F, Herbst J, Ekkernkamp A, Nguyen TT, Bockholdt B (2013) Ballistic parameters of .177 (4.5 mm) caliber plastic-sleeved composite projectiles compared to conventional lead pellets. Int J Legal Med 127:1125–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brukner B (2011) Die Luftpistole. dwj-Verlags GmbH, Blaufelden

  12. Allgemeine Verordnung zum Beschussgesetz (Beschussverordnung-BeschussV) (2015) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/beschussv/BJNR147400006.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2016

  13. Vereinigung der Prüfstellen für angriffshemmende Materialien und Konstruktionen (VPAM) (2012) ARG 2012 Prüfrichtlinie “Materialien und Konstruktionen zur Vermeidung von ab- und rückprallenden Geschossen.” http://www.vpam.eu/fileadmin/Pruefrichtlinien_AKTUELL/ARCHIV/7_ARG/2012-05-23_ARG2012.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2016

  14. Franke E (1981) Ermittlung der Bewegungsenergie der Geschosse. In: Zobel KF (ed) PTB-Bericht W-19 Gesetzliche Munitionsprüfung. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig und Berlin, pp. 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jobski O (2012) Schüsse auf Bahn in Rostock. Der Auswerfer 23:149–175

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kneubuehl BP (2013) Geschosse, Gesamtausgabe. Ballistik, Messtechnik, Wirksamkeit, Treffsicherheit. Stocker-Schmid, Dietikon

  17. Haag LC (1989) Ballistic gelatin: controlling variances in preparation and a suggested method for the calibration of gelatin blocks. AFTE J 21:483–489

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Bruno Brukner for providing the pellet seater used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Frank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Werner, R., Schultz, B. & Frank, M. Influence of pellet seating on the external ballistic parameters of spring-piston air guns. Int J Legal Med 130, 1287–1290 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1415-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1415-3

Keywords

Navigation