Abstract
This paper reports a maternity testing case to assess the biological relationship between a woman and the boy she was adopting. For all 46 tested autosomal STR loci, the adopting woman and the boy shared at least one allele at each locus, which supported that the woman could be the biological mother of the boy. The pairwise kinship indices (KIs) were calculated for various identity-by-descent distributions. Motherson was the most likely relationship with a very high KI (i.e., 6.91E+08) based on 35 independent autosomal STR loci, but KIs of other pairwise relationships (e.g., aunt–nephew, full sib, etc.) were also high. Further testing of X-STRs and mtDNA excluded the maternity relationship between woman and boy, in which 13 out of 20 X-STR loci were inconsistent and 18 nucleotide mismatches were observed at hypervariable regions I and II of the mtDNA. However, a more distant relationship (e.g., aunt–nephew) cannot be excluded. This case reinforces that possible false identifications can occur in kinship analysis cases yielding very high KIs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler JM (2007) Short tandem repeat typing technologies used in human identity testing. Biotechniques 43(4):ii–v
Butler JM (2006) Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. J Forensic Sci 51(2):253–265
Gjertson DW, Brenner CH, Baur MP, Carracedo A, Guidet F, Luque JA, Lessig R, Mayr WR, Pascali VL, Prinz M, Schneider PM, Morling N (2007) SFG: recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(3–4):223–231, Epub 2007 Aug 6
Zhang SH, Li CT, Zhao SM, Li L (2011) Genetic polymorphism of eight X-linked STRs of Mentype® Argus X-8 Kit in Chinese population from Shanghai. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(1):e21–e24, Epub 2009 Nov 20
Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10(4):506–513
Mentype® Argus X-8 PCR Amplification Kit manual, Biotype® AG, 2007
Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R (2010) DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations. Investig Genet 1(1):8
BØrsting C, Morling N (2011) Mutations and/or close relatives? Six case work examples where 49 autosomal SNPs were used as supplementary markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(3):236–241
Phillips C, Fondevila M, Garcĺa-Magarinos M, Rodriguez A, Salas A, Carrecedo A, Lareu MV (2008) Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):198–204
Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R (2011) Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing person identification. J Forensic Sci 56(Suppl 1):S23–S28. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01631.x, Epub 2010 Dec 13
Ge J, Eisenberg A, Budowle B, Chakraborty R (2011) Comparison of the familial DNA database searching policies, J Forensic Sci, Aug 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01867.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Ge, J., Zhang, S. et al. Maternity exclusion with a very high autosomal STRs kinship index. Int J Legal Med 126, 645–648 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0668-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0668-8