Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in the clonogenic bystander effects of mammalian cells after exposure to counted 10 MeV protons and 4.5 MeV α-particles of the PTB microbeam

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the dependence of clonogenic bystander effects on defects in the pathways of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and on linear energy transfer (LET). The single-ion microbeam of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) was used to irradiate parental Chinese hamster ovary cells or derivatives deficient in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) in the G1-phase of the cell cycle. Cell nuclei were targeted with 10 MeV protons (LET = 4.7 keV/μm) or 4.5 MeV α-particles (LET = 100 keV/μm). During exposure, the cells were confluent, allowing signal transfer through both gap junctions and diffusion. When all cell nuclei were targeted with 10 MeV protons, approximately exponential survival curves were obtained for all three cell lines. When only 10% of all cell nuclei were targeted, a significant bystander effect was observed for parental and HR-deficient cells, but not for NHEJ-deficient cells. For all three cell lines, the survival data after exposure of all cell nuclei to 4.5 MeV α-particles could be fitted by exponential curves. When only 10% of all cell nuclei were targeted, significant bystander effects were obtained for parental and HR-deficient cells, whereas for NHEJ-deficient cells a small, but significant, bystander effect was observed only at higher doses. The data suggest that bystander cell killing is a consequence of un- or misrejoined DSB which occur in bystander cells during the S-phase as a result of the processing of oxidative bistranded DNA lesions. The relative contributions of NHEJ and HR to the repairing of DSB in the late S/G2-phase may affect clonogenic bystander effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mothersill C, Seymour CB (1997) Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol 71:421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sawant S, Zengh W, Hopkins KM, Randers-Pehrson G, Lieberman HB, Hall EJ (2002) The radiation-induced bystander effect for clonogenic survival. Radiat Res 157:361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frankenberg D, Greif K, Giesen U (2006) Radiation response of primary human skin fibroblasts and their bystander cells after exposure to counted particles at low and high LET. Int J Radiat Biol 82:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyng FM, Seymour CB, Mothersill C (2000) Production of a signal by irradiated cells which leads to a response in unirradiated cells characteristic of initiation of apoptosis. Br J Cancer 83:1223–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagasawa H, Little JB (1992) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles. Cancer Res 52:6394–6396

    Google Scholar 

  6. Littlefield LG, Hollowell JG, Pool WH (1969) Chromosomal aberrations induced by plasma from irradiated patients: an indirect effect of x-irradiation. Radiology 93:879–886

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prise KM, Belyakov OV, Folkard M, Michael BD (1998) Studies of bystander effects in human fibroblasts using a charged particle microbeam. Int J Radiat Biol 74:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashino G, Prise KM, Schettino G, Folkard M, Vojnovic B, Michael BD, Suzuki K, Kodama S, Watanabe M (2004) Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells. Mutat Res 556:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagasawa H, Little JB (1999) Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle irradiation: evidence for a bystander effect. Radiat Res 152:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadhim MA, Macdonald DA, Goodhead DT, Lorimore SA, Marsden SI, Wright EG (1992) Transmission of chromosomal instability after plutonium alpha-particle irradiation. Nature 355:738–740

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawant S, Randers-Pehrson G, Geard CR, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2001) The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis. I. Transformation can be initiated in the unirradiated neighbours of irradiated cells. Radiat Res 155:397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell SA, Marino SA, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2004) Bystander effect and adaptive response in C3H10T1/2 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 80:465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hickman AW, Jaramillo RJ, Lechner JF, Johnson NF (1994) Alpha-particle-induced p53 protein expression in a rat lung epithelial cell strain. Cancer Res 54:5797–5800

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iyer R, Lehnert BE (2000) Factors underlying the cell growth-related bystander responses to alpha particles. Cancer Res 60:1290–1298

    Google Scholar 

  15. Narayanan PK, Goodwin EH, Lehnert BE (1997) Alpha particles initiate biological production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in human cells. Cancer Res 57:3963–3971

    Google Scholar 

  16. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Spitz DR, Little JB (2002) Oxidative metabolism modulates signal transduction and micronucleus formation in bystander cells from alpha-particle-irradiated normal human fibroblast cultures. Cancer Res 62:5436–5442

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iyer R, Lehnert BE (2002) Alpha-particle-induced increase in the radioresistance of normal human bystander cells. Radiat Res 157:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iyer R, Lehnert BE (2002) Low dose, low LET ionizing radiation-induced radioadaptation and associated early response in unirradiated cells. Mutat Res 503:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagasawa H, Huo L, Little JB (2003) Increased bystander mutagenic effect in DNA double-strand break repair-deficient mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol 79:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Little JB, Nagasawa H, Li GC, Chen DJ (2003) Involvement of the nonhomologous end joining DNA repair pathway in the bystander effect for chromosomal aberrations. Radiat Res 159:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mothersill C, Seymour RJ, Seymour CB (2004) Bystander effects in repair-deficient cell lines. Radiat Res 161:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang B, Ohyama H, Shang Y, Fujita K, Tanaka K, Nakajima T, Aizawa S, Yukawa O, Hayata I (2004) Adaptive response in embryogenesis: IV. Protective and detrimental bystander effects induced by X radiation in cultured limb bud cells of foetal mice. Radiat Res 161:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Little JB (2001) Direct evidence for the participation of gap-junction mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha-particle irradiated to non-irradiated cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:473–478

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shao C, Furusawa Y, Aoki M, Ando K (2003) Role of gap junctional intercellular communication in radiation-induced bystander effects in human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 160:318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell SA, Randers-Pehrson G, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2004) The bystander response in C3H10T1/2 cells: the influence of cell-to-cell contact. Radiat Res 161:397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shao C, Furusawa Y, Aoki M, Matsumoto H, Ando K (2002) Nitric oxide-mediated bystander effect induced by heavy-ions in human salivary gland tumor cells. Int J Radiat Biol 78:837–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Gooding T, Little JB (1998) Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particles. Radiat Res 150:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou H, Suzuki M, Randers-Pehrson G, Vannais D, Chen G, Trosko JE, Waldren CA, Hei TK (2001) Radiation risk to low fluences of a particles may be greater than we thought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14410–14415

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagasawa H, Cremesti A, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z, Little JB (2002) Involvement of membrane signalling in the bystander effect in irradiated cells. Cancer Res 62:2531–2534

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whitmore GF, Varghese GAJ, Gulyas S (1989) Cell cycle-responses of two X-ray sensitive mutants defective in DNA-repair. Int J Radiat Biol 56:657–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fuller LF, Painter RB (1988) A Chinese hamster ovary cell line hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and deficient in repair replication. Mutat Res 193:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  32. Greif KD, Brede HJ, Frankenberg D, Giesen U (2004) The PTB single ion microbeam for irradiation of living cells. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 217:505–512

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Greif K, Beverung W, Langner F, Frankenberg D, Gellhaus A, Banaz-Yasar F (2006) The PTB microbeam: a versatile instrument for radiobiological research. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 122:313–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hinz JM, Yamada NA, Salazar EP, Tebbs RS, Thompson LH (2005) Influence of double-strand break repair pathways on radiosensitivity throughout the cell cycle in CHO cells. DNA Repair 4:782–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frankenberg-Schwager M, Gebauer A, Koppe C, Wolf S, Pralle E, Frankenberg D (submitted) The role of nonhomologous end joining, conservative homologous recombination and single-strand annealing in the cell cycle dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by sparsely or densely ionising radiation in mammalian cells. Radiat Res

  36. Pastink A, Eeken JCJ, Lohman PHM (2001) Genomic integrity and the repair of double strand DNA breaks. Mutat Res 480–481:37–50

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valerie K, Povirk LF (2003) Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair. Oncogene 22:5792–5812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeggo PA (1997) DNA-PK: at the cross-roads of biochemistry and genetics. Mutat Res 384:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lieber ME, Ma YM, Pannicke U, Schwarz K (2003) Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rothkamm K, Krüger I, Thompson LH, Löbrich M (2003) Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 23:5706–5715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Burdak-Rothkamm S, Short SC, Folkard M, Rothkamm K, Prise KM (2007) ATR-dependent radiation-induced γH2AX foci in bystander primary human astrocytes and glioma cells. Oncogene 26:993–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Buul PPW, van Duijn-Goedhart A (submitted) Effects of DNA double-strand breaks repair pathways on the production of radiogenic chromosomal aberrations throughout the cell cycle in V79 Chinese hamster cells

  43. Buxton GW (1987) Radiation chemistry of the liquid state. (1) Water and homogeneous aqueous solutions. In: Farhataziz A, Rodgers MAJ (eds) Radiation chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp 321–350

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nagasawa H, Peng Y, Wilson PF, Lio Y-C, Chen DJ, Bedford JS, Little JB (2005) Role of homologous recombination in the alpha-particle-induced bystander effect for sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations. Radiat Res 164:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nagasawa H, Little JB (2002) Bystander effect for chromosomal aberrations induced in wild-type and repair deficient CHO cells by low fluences of alpha particles. Mutat Res 508:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hashimoto M, Donald CD, Yannone SM, Chen DJ, Roy R, Kow YW (2001) A possible role of Ku in mediating sequential repair of closely opposed lesions. J Biol Chem 276:12827–12831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the European Commission (FIGH-CT-2002-00218). The authors would like to thank O. Döhr, H. Eggestein, T. Heldt and M. Hoffmann for the operation of the PTB cyclotron, K. Beverung, A. Heiske and S. Löb for their constant support with the irradiation of cells and E. Eggestein and B. Heise for their support in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department 6.4, Ion Accelerators and Reference Radiation Fields, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116, Braunschweig, Germany

    Dieter Frankenberg, Klaus-D. Greif, Wolfgang Beverung, Frank Langner & Ulrich Giesen

Authors
  1. Dieter Frankenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Klaus-D. Greif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Beverung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frank Langner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulrich Giesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Giesen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankenberg, D., Greif, KD., Beverung, W. et al. The role of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in the clonogenic bystander effects of mammalian cells after exposure to counted 10 MeV protons and 4.5 MeV α-particles of the PTB microbeam. Radiat Environ Biophys 47, 431–438 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-008-0187-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-008-0187-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation