Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: Contrib Mineral Petrol (2013) 166:887–910 DOI 10.1007/s00410-013-0899-9
An unfortunate coding error led to erroneous predicted abundances of Na2O in the melting models presented in Table 5 of Grove et al. (2013). The source of this error has been discovered and corrected; the cause of the discrepancy was an error in assignment of the partition coefficient expressions used for orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene. The values presented in a corrected Table 5 are the ones obtained using the appropriate partition coefficients for Na2O. Our models of garnet lherzolite melts now have Na2O abundances that are similar to the melts predicted by Longhi (2002) and the experimentally produced melt of Walter (1998).
References
Grove TL, Holbig ES, Barr JA, Till CB, Krawczynski MJ (2013) Mantle melting in the garnet stability field: experiments and predictive models. Contrib Mineral Petrol 166:887–910. doi:10.1007/s00410-013-0899-9
Hart SR, Zindler A (1986) In search of a bulk-Earth composition. Chem Geol 57(3–4):247–267
Kinzler RJ, Grove TL (1992) Primary magmas of midocean ridge basalts 2. Applications. J Geophys Res 97(B5):6907–6926
Longhi J (2002) Some phase equilibrium systematics of lherzolite melting: I. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 3:art. no.-1020
Walter MJ (1998) Melting of garnet peridotite and the origin of komatiite and depleted lithosphere. J Petrol 39(1):29–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00410-013-0899-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grove, T.L., Holbig, E.S., Barr, J.A. et al. Erratum to: Melts of garnet lherzolite: experiments, models and comparison to melts of pyroxenite and carbonated lherzolite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 168, 1086 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-014-1086-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-014-1086-3