Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Diagnosis-Specific Survival Score for Patients to be Irradiated for Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Lung Cancer
  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Personalized treatment helps one achieve optimal outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Understanding patients’ survival prognoses in a palliative situation like intracerebral metastases is critical. A new survival score, the WBRT-30-NSCLC, was developed for patients with intracerebral metastases from NSCLC.

Methods

Eight factors were investigated in 157 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) including age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), interval from diagnosis of NSCLC to WBRT, pre-WBRT systemic treatment, primary tumor control, number of intracerebral metastases, and metastasis outside the brain. Factors significant (p < 0.05) or showing a trend (p < 0.08) on multivariate analysis were used for the WBRT-30-NSCLC. Patient scores were derived by adding factor scores (6-month survival rates divided by 10). WBRT-30-NSCLC was compared to other scores for intracerebral metastases from NSCLC.

Results

On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.005), KPS (p < 0.001), systemic treatment (p = 0.018), and metastasis outside the brain (p < 0.001) were significant; number of intracerebral metastases (p = 0.075) showed a trend. Four groups were designed (912, 1317, 1820, and 22 points) with 6-month survival rates of 3, 26, 65, and 100%. Positive predictive value (PPV) to predict death ≤ 6 months after WBRT was 97% (updated DS-GPA classification 86%, Rades-NSCLC 88%), and PPV to predict survival ≥ 6 months was 100% (updated DS-GPA 78%, Rades-NSCLC 74%).

Conclusions

The WBRT-30-NSCLC appeared very precise in identifying patients with intracerebral metastases from NSCLC dying ≤ 6 months or surviving ≥ 6 months. It appeared more precise than previous scores and can support physicians developing personalized treatment regimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 69:7–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsao MN, Rades D, Wirth A et al (2010) Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2:210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rades D (2011) Radiation therapy for metastatic disease. In: Jeremic B (ed) Advances in radiation oncology in lung cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 561–573

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Rades D, Huttenlocher S, Dziggel L et al (2015) A new tool predicting survival after radiosurgery alone for one or two cerebral metastases from lung cancer. Lung 193:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rades D, Kieckebusch S, Lohynska R et al (2007) Reduction of overall treatment time in patients irradiated for more than three brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:1509–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeAngelis LM, Delattre JY, Posner JB (1989) Radiation-induced dementia in patients cured of brain metastases. Neurology 39:789–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rades D, Panzner A, Dziggel L et al (2012) Dose-escalation of whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastasis in patients with a favorable survival prognosis. Cancer 118:3852–3859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D et al (2012) Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 30:419–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rades D, Dziggel L, Segedin B et al (2013) A new survival score for patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 189:777–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rades D, Dziggel L, Nagy V et al (2013) A new survival score for patients with brain metastases who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. Radiother Oncol 108:123–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulvenna P, Nankivell M, Barton R et al (2016) Dexamethasone and supportive care with or without whole brain radiotherapy in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases unsuitable for resection or stereotactic radiotherapy (QUARTZ): results from a phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet 388:2004–2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wrona A, Dziadziuszko R, Jassem J (2018) Management of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 71:59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karnath SD, Kumthekar PU (2018) Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) metastatic disease. Front Oncol 8:414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA et al (2014) Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol 32:3810–3816

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown PD, Pugh S, Laack N et al (2013) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG): memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neuro Oncol 15:1429–1437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Rades.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with ethical standards and the Helsinki declaration from 1964 and its later amendments. The study was approved by the ethic committee of the University of Lübeck (reference number: 19-003A). Due to its retrospective design, informed consent specifically for this study was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rades, D., Hansen, H.C., Schild, S.E. et al. A New Diagnosis-Specific Survival Score for Patients to be Irradiated for Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Lung 197, 321–326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00223-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00223-6

Keywords

Navigation