Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To compare the recovery rates of modified Epley’s against Semont’s manoeuvres in patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized clinical trial

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the commonest causes of peripheral vertigo. It is treated with various canalolith repositioning manoeuvres by changing the head positions to allow the otoconial debris to fall back from the affected canal back to the utricle. The present study has compared the rate of recovery of vertigo with modified Epley’s manoeuvres as compared to Semont’s manoeuvre in patients with posterior canal BPPV.

Materials and methods

One hundred and seventy patients diagnosed by positive Dix–Hallpike test as posterior canal BPPV were included in this clinical trial. Subjective analysis of vertigo was done using visual analogue scale. 85 patients each were recruited in two arms by simple randomization using lottery method. Modified Epley’s manoeuvre was administered to one group and Semont’s manoeuvre to the other. They were recalled after 2 weeks for clinical assessment with repeat Dix–Hallpike and VAS.

Results

Repeat Dix–Hallpike manoeuvres after two weeks revealed that 95.3 and 90.6% patients improved in Modified Epley’s and Semont’s group, respectively. After the second manoeuvre, the resolution rate was significantly higher in Semont’s manoeuvre 100% (8 out of 8 patients), as compared to 25% (1 out of 4 patients) in Modified Epley’s manoeuvre. Comparison of the mean values of VAS day 0 and VAS 2 weeks has been found to be statistically significant (p value of < 0.001).

Conclusion

Both Epley’s and Semont’s manoeuvre are equally efficacious in treatment of BPPV. However, use of Semont’s manoeuvre required fewer repeat manoeuvres for complete resolution of symptoms in patients. The Semont’s manoeuvre is also comparatively easier to perform with less number of position changes, takes less time, and has no requirement of post-manoeuvre mobility restrictions. Hence, it is recommended that Semont’s manoeuvre can be routinely used for the management of PC BPPV especially in older population and patients with spinal problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Original data are available on demand.

References

  1. Dix R, Hallpike CS (1952) The pathology, symptomatology and diagnosis of certain common disorders of the vestibular system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 6:987–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. von Brevern M (2013) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Semin Neurol 33(03):204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta AK, Sharma KG, Sharma P (2019) Effect of Epley’s, Semont’s Maneuvers and Brandt–Daroff exercise on quality of life in patients with posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PSCBPPV). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71(1):99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton MJ, Eby TL, Rosenfeld RM (2012) Extracts from the Cochrane Library: modifications of the Epley (canalith repositioning) maneuver for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:407–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baloh RW, Honrubia V, Jacobson K (1987) Benign positional vertigo: clinical and oculographic features in 240 cases. Neurology 37(3):371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes CA, Proctor L (1997) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope 107(5):607–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuknecht HF (1969) Cupulolithiasis. Arch Otolaryngol 90(6):765–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall SF, Ruby RR, McClure JA (1979) The mechanics of benign paroxysmal vertigo. J Otolaryngol 8(2):151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fife TD, Iverson DJ, Lempert T, Furman JM, Baloh RW, Tusa RJ, Hain TC, Herdman S, Morrow MJ, Gronseth GS (2008) Practice parameter: therapies for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (an evidence-based review): [RETIRED] Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 70(22):2067–2074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ, Zee DS, Proctor LR, Mattox DE (1993) Single treatment approaches to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119(4):450–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramakrishna J, Goebel JA, Parnes LS (2012) Efficacy and safety of bilateral posterior canal occlusion in patients with refractory benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: case report series. Otol Neurotol 33(4):640–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joshi D, Gyanpuri V, Pathak A, Chaurasia RN, Singh V, Dhiman NR (2021) Epley Maneuver versus Gans repositioning maneuver in treating posterior canal BPPV and familial incidence of BPPV: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sen K, Sarkar A, Raghavan A (2016) Comparative efficacy of epley and semont maneuver in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Astrocyte 3(2):96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ajayan PV, Aleena PF, Jacob AM (2017) Epley’s maneuver versus Semont’s maneuver in treatment of posterior canal benign positional paroxysmal vertigo. Int J Res Med Sci 5:2854–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salvinelli F, Casale M, Trivelli M et al (2003) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a comparative prospective study on the efficacy of Semont’s maneuver and no treatment strategy. La ClinicaTerapeutica. 154(1):7–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nadagoud SV, Bhat VS, Pragathi BS (2023) Comparative efficacy of Epley, Semont and Gans Maneuver in treating posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 25:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mishra P, Sindhu KL, Chethana R, Kaushik M (2023) Epleys versus semont’s manoeuvre in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75(Suppl 1):523–527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Celis-Aguilar E, Mayoral-Flores HO, Torrontegui-Zazueta LA, Medina-Cabrera CA, León-Leyva IC, Dehesa-López E (2022) Effectiveness of Brandt Daroff, Semont and Epley maneuvers in the treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kesimli MC, Kaya D, Ceylan S, Ceylan A, Ünal M. The efficacy of Epley and Semont maneuvers in posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo treatment: a short-term comparative study

  20. Strupp M, Mandala M, Vinck AS, Van Breda L, Salerni L, Gerb J, Bayer O, Mavrodiev V, Goldschagg N (2023) The Semont-Plus Maneuver or the Epley maneuver in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized clinical study. JAMA Neurol 80(8):798–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT, AFMC, Pune, India

    Bandana Thakur, Poonam Raj & Kamalpreet Singh

  2. MH, Doda, India

    Viswanathan Anand

Authors
  1. Bandana Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Poonam Raj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamalpreet Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Viswanathan Anand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamalpreet Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Study protocol was performed according to ethical guidelines of the 2002 Declaration of Helsinki, and carried out after approval by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 26 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, B., Raj, P., Singh, K. et al. To compare the recovery rates of modified Epley’s against Semont’s manoeuvres in patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08657-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08657-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation