Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the effect of absorbable steroid sinus implant: a state-of-the-art systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Endoscopic sinus surgery is not a definitive treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The use of sinus stents after surgery to maintain sinus patency and deliver local steroids has gained popularity. The first steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implant (SEBI) approved for this indication, later Propel, was developed in 2011. This state-of-the-art review aims to summarize the available evidence, as well as to point out potential pitfalls and lack of specific analyses to guide future research on this new therapeutic option.

Data sources

Pubmed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO.

Review methods

Nine research questions were defined: Are steroid-eluting Sinus implants useful for the control of CRS symptoms after surgery? Do they improve surgical field healing after CRS surgery? Do they decrease polyp regrowth after ESS? Do they decrease the need for ESS? Are they useful in symptom control as in-office procedure? Are they better than other steroid-impregnated resorbable materials? Do they have a positive impact on olfaction? Are they safe? Are they cost-effective? Retrieved articles were reviewed by two authors.

Results

Twenty nine studies were included: 3 metanalysis, 1 systematic review, 10 randomized clinical trials, 4 quasi-experimental studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, 4 cost studies, 3 case series and 2 expert consensus. The review encompassed a population of 3,012 patients treated with SEBI and 2826 controls.

Conclusions

This is the first state-of-the-art review assessing steroid eluting bioabsorbable stent evidence. Despite the effort in recent years, still several questions remain unanswered. This review will hopefully guide future research efforts to better define the role of SEBI in the otolaryngology practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Pleis JR, Lethbridge-Cejku M (2007) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Vital Health Stat 10. 235:1–153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metson RB, Gliklich RE (2000) Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 110(3 Pt 3):24–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baguley C, Brownlow A, Yeung K, Pratt E, Sacks R, Harvey R (2014) The fate of chronic rhinosinusitis sufferers after maximal medical therapy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(7):525–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy DW, Wright ED, Goldberg AN (2000) Objective and subjective outcomes in surgery for chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 110(3 Pt 3):29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bugten V, Nordgård S, Steinsvåg S (2006) The effects of debridement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 116(11):2037–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy JG, Lee SW, Wilson CG (1985) Intranasal drug delivery by spray and drops. J Pharm Pharmacol 37(5):294–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murr AH, Smith TL, Hwang PH, Bhattacharyya N, Lanier BJ, Stambaugh JW et al (2011) Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting sinus stent. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 1(1):23–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forwith KD, Chandra RK, Yun PT, Miller SK, Jampel HD (2011) ADVANCE: a multisite trial of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants. Laryngoscope 121(11):2473–2480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marple BF, Smith TL, Han JK, Gould AR, Jampel HD, Stambaugh JW et al (2012) Advance II: a prospective, randomized study assessing safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable steroid-releasing sinus implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(6):1004–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith TL, Singh A, Luong A, Ow RA, Shotts SD, Sautter NB et al (2016) Randomized controlled trial of a bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implant in the frontal sinus opening. Laryngoscope 126(12):2659–2664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lavigne F, Miller SK, Gould AR, Lanier BJ, Romett JL (2014) Steroid-eluting sinus implant for in-office treatment of recurrent nasal polyposis: a prospective, multicenter study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(5):381–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Han JK, Forwith KD, Smith TL, Kern RC, Brown WJ, Miller SK et al (2014) RESOLVE: a randomized, controlled, blinded study of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(11):861–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forwith KD, Han JK, Stolovitzky JP, Yen DM, Chandra RK, Karanfilov B et al (2016) RESOLVE: bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis after sinus surgery: 6-month outcomes from a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(6):573–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kern RC, Stolovitzky JP, Silvers SL, Singh A, Lee JT, Yen DM et al (2018) A phase 3 trial of mometasone furoate sinus implants for chronic sinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8(4):471–481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S et al (2020) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology 58(Suppl S29):1–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Smith TL, Bleier B, DeConde A, Luong AU et al (2021) International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 11(3):213–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh A, Luong AU, Fong KJ, Ow RA, Han JK, Gerencer R et al (2019) Bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implants in the frontal sinus ostia: a pooled analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(2):131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han JK, Marple BF, Smith TL, Murr AH, Lanier BJ, Stambaugh JW et al (2012) Effect of steroid-releasing sinus implants on postoperative medical and surgical interventions: an efficacy meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2(4):271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Z, Hwang P, Sun Y, Zhou B (2015) Steroid-eluting sinus stents for improving symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD010436

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luong A, Ow RA, Singh A, Weiss RL, Han JK, Gerencer R et al (2018) Safety and effectiveness of a bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implant for the paranasal sinus ostia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144(1):28–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rawl JW, McQuitty RA, Khan MH, Reichert LK, Kuo YF, Chaaban MR (2020) Comparison of steroid-releasing stents vs nonabsorbable packing as middle meatal spacers. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 10(3):328–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang Z, Zhou B, Wang D, Zang H, Zhang H, Wang H et al (2022) Comparison of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents versus nasopore after endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial. Ear Nose Throat J 101(4):260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang C, Yu L, Chu X, Wang K, Li J, Lai Y et al (2022) Short-term postoperative efficacy of steroid-eluting stents for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 18:399

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matheny KE, Carter KB, Tseng EY, Fong KJ (2014) Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable sinus implants in the office setting: a prospective case series. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(10):808–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ow R, Groppo E, Clutter D, Gawlicka AK (2014) Steroid-eluting sinus implant for in-office treatment of recurrent polyposis: a pharmacokinetic study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(10):816–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman V, Mortimer KM, Mulder K, Topuria I, Gliklich R, Kallman JE (2022) Real-world evidence analysis of the impact of steroid-eluting implants on healthcare resource use among chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing sinus surgery. Curr Med Res Opin 38(3):375–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rudmik L, Smith TL (2014) Economic evaluation of a steroid-eluting sinus implant following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(2):359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizzo JA, Rudmik L, Mallow PJ, Palli SR (2016) Budget impact analysis of bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus implants following endoscopic sinus surgery. J Med Econ 19(9):829–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Javanbakht M, Saleh H, Hemami MR, Branagan-Harris M, Boiano M (2020) A corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a UK-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoecon Open 4(4):679–686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ernst FR, Imhoff RJ, DeConde A, Manes RP (2019) Budget impact of a steroid-eluting sinus implant versus sinus surgery for adult chronic sinusitis patients with nasal polyps. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 25(8):941–950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Narwani V, Torabi SJ, Kasle DA, Patel RA, Lerner MZ, Manes RP (2022) Adverse events associated with corticosteroid-eluting sinus stents: a MAUDE database analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 166(1):179–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang Z, Huang Q, Zhou B, Ma J, Wang M, Dong Y (2019) Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents for patients with refractory frontal diseases undergoing a revision Draf 3 procedure: a case series. Acta Otolaryngol 139(7):636–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Hwang PH, Smith TL, Alt JA, Baroody FM et al (2016) International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(Suppl 1):S22-209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee VS, Patel P, O’Brien D, Scangas GA, Campbell RG, Chandra R et al (2022) Indications for absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants: viewpoint via the Delphi method. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 12(10):1225–1231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Aukema AAC, Mulder PGH, Fokkens WJ (2005) Treatment of nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis with fluticasone propionate nasal drops reduces need for sinus surgery. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115(5):1017–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hissaria P, Smith W, Wormald PJ, Taylor J, Vadas M, Gillis D et al (2006) Short course of systemic corticosteroids in sinonasal polyposis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with evaluation of outcome measures. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118(1):128–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grayson JW, Harvey RJ (2019) Topical corticosteroid irrigations in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(S1):S9-15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hox V, Bobic S, Callebaux I, Jorissen M, Hellings PW (2010) Nasal obstruction and smell impairment in nasal polyp disease: correlation between objective and subjective parameters. Rhinology 48(4):426–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shah VN, Pasick LJ, Benito DA, Ghiam MK, D’Aguillo C (2022) Complications associated with PROPEL mometasone furoate bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus stents from 2012 to 2020. Am J Rhinol Allergy 36(2):185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li PMMC, Downie D, Hwang PH (2009) Controlled steroid delivery via bioabsorbable stent: safety and performance in a rabbit model. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(6):591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lehmann AE, Raquib AR, Siddiqi SH, Meier J, Durand ML, Gray ST et al (2021) Prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 11(7):1047–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moreno-Luna R, Martin-Jimenez DI, Callejon-Leblic MA, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Maza-Solano JM, Porras-Gonzalez C et al (2022) Usefulness of bilateral mucoplasty plus reboot surgery in severe type-2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Rhinology 60(5):368–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. DeConde AS, Smith TL (2016) Outcomes after frontal sinus surgery: an evidence-based review. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 49(4):1019–1033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chandra RK, Palmer JN, Tangsujarittham T, Kennedy DW (2004) Factors associated with failure of frontal sinusotomy in the early follow-up period. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ainhoa García-Lliberós.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvo-Henriquez, C., García-Lliberós, A., Sánchez-Gómez, S. et al. Assessing the effect of absorbable steroid sinus implant: a state-of-the-art systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08531-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08531-1

Keywords

Navigation