Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary on "Assessment of the Eustachian tube: a review"

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 29 May 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Liu S, Ni X, Zhang J (2023) Assessment of the Eustachian tube: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280(9):3915–3920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08026-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldè M, Di Berardino F, Marchisio P et al (2021) Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on otitis media with effusion in children: future therapeutic implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 165(5):710–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820987458

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward BK, Carey JP, Minor LB (2017) Superior canal dehiscence syndrome: lessons from the first 20 years. Front Neurol 8:177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle WJ, Swarts JD, Banks J, Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Alper CM (2013) Sensitivity and specificity of eustachian tube function tests in adults. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(7):719–727. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3559

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith ME, Scoffings DJ, Tysome JR (2016) Imaging of the Eustachian tube and its function: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 58(6):543–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1663-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA: substantial contributions to the conception, design, interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. GC: substantial contributions to the conception, design, and interpretation of data; revising the work critically for important intellectual content; giving final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirko Aldè.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldè, M., Cantarella, G. Commentary on "Assessment of the Eustachian tube: a review". Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281, 527–528 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08241-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08241-0

Navigation