Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of the test–retest reliability of the functional head impulse test in healthy young adults

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To determine the test and retest reliability of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy young adults.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three healthy participants (17 women, 16 men) aged 18–30 years were included in the study. Each participant underwent the fHIT twice, 1 week apart, by the same experienced clinician. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine test–retest reliability.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the results of total percentage of correct answer (CA%) of the fHIT obtained in session 1 and session 2 measurements in the lateral, anterior, and posterior semicircular canals (SCCs) (p > 0.05). ICC values for test–retest reliability were found to range from 0.619 to 0.665 for the three semicircular canals (SCCs).

Conclusion

The test–retest reliability of the fHIT device was moderate. Attention, cognition, and fatigue may be the factors reducing reliability. In the diagnosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation processes of vestibular diseases in clinics, changes in the fHIT CA% can be used to assess vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) functionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Research data are not shared.

References

  1. Weber KP, Aw ST, Todd MJ, McGarvie LA, Curthoys IS, Halmagyi GM (2008) Head impulse test in unilateral vestibular loss: vestibulo-ocular reflex and catch-up saccades. Neurology 70:454–463. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000299117.48935.2e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan S, Chang R (2013) Anatomy of the vestibular system: a review. NeuroRehabil 32:437–443. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guneri EA (2016) Vestibüler sistemin anatomisi ve fizyolojisi. In: Onerci T (ed) Kulak burun boğaz baş boyun cerrahisi. otoloji. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, p 53

  4. Colagiorgio P, Colnaghi S, Versino M, Ramat S (2013) A new tool for investigating the functional testing of the VOR. Front Neurol 4:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (2009) The video head impulse test: diagnostic accuracy in peripheral vestibulopathy. Neurology 73:1134–1141. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bacf85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sjögren J, Fransson PA, Karlberg M, Magnusson M, Tjernström F (2018) Functional head impulse testing might be useful for assessing vestibular compensation after unilateral vestibular loss. Front Neurol 9:979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cochrane GD, Christy JB, Kicker ET, Kailey RP, England BK (2021) Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of computerized clinical vestibular tools. J Vestib Res 31:365–373. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-201522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Romano F, Bertolini G, Agostino D, Straumann D, Ramat S, Feddermann-Demont N (2019) Functional head impulse test in professional athletes: sport-specific normative values and implication for sport-related concussion. Front Neurol 10:387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00387

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Politi L, Salerni L, Bubbico L, Ferretti F, Carucci M, Rubegni G, Mandala M (2022) Risk of falls, vestibular multimodal processing, and multisensory integration decline in the elderly—predictive role of the functional head impulse test. Front Neurol 13:964017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.964017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koo TK, Li MY (2017) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research [published correction appears in J Chiropr Med 16:346]. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahfuz MM, Millar JL, Schubert MC (2021) Repeated video head impulse testing in patients is a stable measure of the passive vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Otol 16:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2020.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh NK, Govindaswamy R, Jagadish N (2019) Test-retest reliability of video head impulse test in healthy individuals and individuals with dizziness. J Am Acad Audiol 30:744–752. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schubert MC, Migliaccio AA (2016) Stability of the aVOR to repeat head impulse testing. Otol Neurotol 37:781–786. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bansal S, Sinha SK (2016) Assessment of VOR gain function and its test-retest reliability in normal hearing individuals. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:3167–3173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3951-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murnane O, Mabrey H, Pearson A, Byrd S, Akin F (2014) Normative data and test-retest reliability of the SYNAPSYS video head impulse test. J Am Acad Audiol 25:244–252. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.25.3.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sayed SZ, Abdul Wahat NH, Raymond AA, Hussein N, Omar M (2023) Test-retest reliability, effects of age and comparison of horizontal 2 semicircular canals gain values between head impulse and suppression head impulse paradigms. J Int Adv Otol 19:33–40. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.21387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Riska KM, Hall CD (2016) Reliability and normative data for the dynamic visual acuity test for vestibular screening. Otol Neurotol 37:545–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mañago MM, Schenkman M, Berliner J, Hebert JR (2016) Gaze stabilization and dynamic visual acuity in people with multiple sclerosis. J Vestib Res 26:469–477. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-160593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufman DR, Puckett MJ, Smith MJ, Wilson KS, Cheema R, Landers MR (2014) Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of gaze stability and dynamic visual acuity in high school and college football players. Phys Ther Sport 15:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward BK, Mohammad MT, Whitney SL, Marchetti GF, Furman JM (2010) The reliability, stability, and concurrent validity of a test of gaze stabilization. J Vestib Res 20:363–372. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-2010-0371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tranter-Entwistle I, Dawes P, Darlington CL, Smith PF, Cutfield N (2016) Video head impulse in comparison to caloric testing in unilateral vestibular schwannoma. Acta Otolaryngol 136:1110–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2016.1185540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F (2002) Standardize mini mental test’in türk toplumunda hafif demans tanisinda geçerlik ve güvenilirliği [Reliability and validity of the standardized mini mental state examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish population]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 13(4):273–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martellucci S, Ralli M, Attanasio G, Russo FY, Marcelli V, Greco A, Gallo A, Fiore M, Petrella C, Ferraguti G, Ceccanti M, de Vincentiis M (2021) Alcohol binge-drinking damage on the vestibulo-oculomotor reflex. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06052-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Emekci T, Erbek HS (2022) The relationship between functional head impulse test and age in healthy individuals. J Vestib Res 32:123–134. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-210040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karababa E, Satar B, Genç H (2023) Evaluation of effects of optokinetic and rotational stimuli with functional head impulse test (fHIT) in individuals with motion sickness [published online ahead of print, 2023 Jan 14]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07819-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pelin Pistav Akmese.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirazli, G., Emekci, T., Inceoglu, F. et al. An evaluation of the test–retest reliability of the functional head impulse test in healthy young adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 5339–5343 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08063-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08063-0

Keywords

Navigation