Abstract
Purpose
To developed a model to screen distant metastatic laryngeal carcinoma (DMLC) patients who would benefit from the primary tumor resection.
Methods
The propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to avoid disproportionate distributions of the confounding factors. We hypothesized that patients who underwent surgery would benefit from surgery by having a longer median cancer-specific survival (CSS) than patients without surgery. Multivariable Cox model was used to explore the independent factors of CSS and overall survival (OS) among PSM population. We used these factors to construct a nomogram to identify surgery benefit patients. The predictive performance and clinical practicability of the nomogram were determined by area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve.
Results
The CSS and OS for patients who received primary tumor resection were significantly longer than those without resection (median CSS: 19 months vs. 10 months, P = 0.009; median OS: 21 months vs. 10 months, P = 0.001). The nomogram displayed a good degree of discrimination and calibration. The mean AUC of the nomogram was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.76) through threefold cross-validation.
Conclusions
A predictive model was established and might be used to screen the optimal candidates for primary tumor surgery in DMLC patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
This study was based on the publicly available data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and available in the public domain: https://seer.cancer.gov/.
Abbreviations
- LC:
-
Laryngeal carcinoma
- DMLC:
-
Distant metastasis of laryngeal carcinoma
- SCC:
-
Squamous cell carcinoma
- SEER:
-
Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results
- AJCC:
-
American Joint Committee on Cancer
- RT:
-
Radiation
- CHT:
-
Chemotherapy
- CRT:
-
Chemoradiotherapy
- TAS:
-
Treatment after surgery
- NCCN:
-
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- PSM:
-
Propensity score matching
- CSS:
-
Cancer-specific survival
- OS:
-
Overall survival
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2020) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–449. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Cosetti M, Yu GP, Schantz SP (2008) Five-year survival rates and time trends of laryngeal cancer in the US population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134(4):370–379. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.4.370
Liu JC, Bhayani M, Kuchta K, Galloway T, Fundakowski C (2019) Patterns of distant metastasis in head and neck cancer at presentation: implications for initial evaluation. Oral Oncol 88:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.023
Kowalski LP, Carvalho AL (2000) Natural history of untreated head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 36(8):1032–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00054-x
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2021. IOP Publishing Physics Web. http://www.nccn.org/patients. Accessed 26 Mar 2021
Pan Y, Hong Y, Liang Z, Zhuang W et al (2019) Survival analysis of distant metastasis of laryngeal carcinoma: analysis based on SEER database. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol Head Neck Surg 276(1):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5244-5
Lin Z, Lin H, C X, et al (2020) The primary tumor resection in patients with distant metastatic laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol Head Neck Surg 277(10):2859–2868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05987-9
Feuer EJ, Lee M, Mariotto AB et al (2012) The Cancer Survival Query System: making survival estimates from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program more timely and relevant for recently diagnosed patients. Cancer 118(22):5652–5662. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27615
Morgan CJ (2018) Reducing bias using propensity score matching. J Nucl Cardiol 25(2):404–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1012-y
McCaffrey DF, Ridgeway G, Morral AR (2004) Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychol Methods 9:403–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403
Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697
Wiegand S, Zimmermann A, Wilhelm T, Werner JA (2015) Survival after distant metastasis in head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res 35(10):5499–5502
Steuer CE, El-Deiry M, Parks JR, Higgins KA, Saba NF (2017) An update on larynx cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):31–50. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21386
Harrington KJ, Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr et al (2017) Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(8):1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30421-7
Demicheli R, Retsky MW, Hrushesky WJ, Baum M, Gukas ID (2008) The effects of surgery on tumor growth: A century of investigations. Ann Oncol 19:1821–1828. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn386
Turner N, Tran B, Tran PV, Sinnathamby M, Wong HL, Jones I, Croxford M, Desai J, Tie J, Field KM, Kosmider S, Bae S, Gibbs P (2015) Primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with reversal of systemic inflammation and improved survival. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14(3):185–191
Flanigan RC, Mickisch G, Sylvester R, Tangen C, Van Poppel H, Crawford ED (2004) Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis. J Urol 171(3):1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000110610.61545.ae
Li H, Sun Z, Yang F et al (2019) Primary tumour resection in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ipsilateral pleural dissemination (M1a): a population-based study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 55:1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy439
Zhang R, Zou J, Li P, Li Q, Qiao Y, Han J, Huang K, Ruan P, Lin H, Song Q, Fu Z (2019) Surgery to the primary tumor is associated with improved survival of patients with metastatic esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched analyses of a large retrospective cohort. Dis Esophagus 33(3):doz051. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doz051
Pan Y, Hong Y, Liang Z, Zhuang W (2019) Survival analysis of distant metastasis of laryngeal carcinoma: analysis based on SEER database. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(1):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5244-5
Lin Z, Lin H, Chen X et al (2020) The primary tumor resection in patients with distant metastatic laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(10):2859–2868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05987-9
Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL (2008) Head and neck cancer. Lancet (London, England) 371(9625):1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60728-X
Scherl C, Mantsopoulos K, Semrau S et al (2017) Management of advanced hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer with and without cartilage invasion. Auris Nasus Larynx 44:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2016.08.002
Yeh DH, Sahovaler A, Fung K (2017) Reconstruction after salvage laryngectomy. Oral Oncol 75:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.10.009
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China (81671657). This work is founded by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project and Tianjin Institute of imaging medicine.
Funding
This study has received funding by the National Natural Science Fund of China (81671657) and Tianjin Health Commission Science and Technology Key Project (Z20002). This work is founded by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project and Tianjin Institute of imaging medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL: design, acquisition of data, analysis, drafting, revision, PL: analysis and interpretation of data, revision, WS: analysis and interpretation of data, revision, YY: design, analysis and interpretation of data, revision, All authors: final approval of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because the retrospective nature of the study.
Ethical approval
This study was based on the publicly available data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and available in the public domain: https://seer.cancer.gov/. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the First Central Hospital of Tianjin.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Lin, P., Shen, W. et al. A population-based model identifying optimal candidate for primary tumor resection in distant metastatic laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 2885–2896 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07851-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07851-y