Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic stapling versus laser for Zenker diverticulum: a retrospective cohort study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the evolution of the endoscopic techniques for the treatment of symptomatic Zenker diverticulum, comparative studies are lacking. Aim of this observational study was to compare safety, efficacy, and outcomes of endoscopic stapling (ES) versus Laser (EL).

Methods

A prospectively collected database of patients who underwent treatment for Zenker diverticulum at a single institution was reviewed. Consecutive patients treated by ES or EL were included in the study. Demographic data, presenting symptoms, diverticulum characteristics, and intra- and postoperative data were analyzed. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaires were administered to assess severity of dysphagia and quality of life before and after treatment.

Results

Between March 2017 and September 2018, 36 patients underwent ES or EL. In the TL group (n = 19), the diverticulum size was smaller compared to the EL group (n = 17) (p = 0.002). Two perforations occurred in the EL group, one treated conservatively and the other requiring drainage of a mediastinal abscess. At a median follow-up of 16 months, symptoms improved in both groups but the number of patients with a postoperative FOSS score ≥ 2 significantly decreased only after EL (p < 0.001). The scores of all items of the MDADI questionnaire significantly increased in both groups, but the average delta values were greater in the EL patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both TL and ES are effective treatment options for Zenker diverticulum. Postoperative quality of life was significantly higher in patients undergoing EL compared to ES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ferreira LE, Simmons DT, Baron TH (2008) Zenker’s diverticula: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and flexible endoscopic management. Dis Esophagus 21:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sivarao DV, Goyal RK (2000) Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med 108(4A):27S–37S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Overbeek JJ, Hoeksema PE, Edens ET (1984) Microendoscopic surgery of the hypopharyngeal diverticulum using electrocoagulation or carbon dioxide laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93:34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collard JM, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 56:573–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peracchia A, Bonavina L, Narne S et al (1998) Minimally invasive surgery for Zenker diverticulum: analysis of results in 95 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 133:695–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonavina L, Rottoli M, Bona D, Siboni S, Russo IS, Bernardi D (2012) Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 26:2856–2861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tontini GE, Neumann H, Pastorelli L et al (2017) Thulium laser in interventional endoscopy: animal and human studies. Endoscopy 49:365–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siboni S, Aiolfi A, Ceriani C et al (2018) Cricopharyngeal myotomy with thulium laser through flexible endoscopy: proof-of-concept study. Endosc Int Open 6(4):470–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salassa JR (1999) A functional outcome swallowing scale for staging oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci 17(4):230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J et al (2001) The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:870–876

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siboni S, Asti E, Sozzi M, Bonitta G, Melloni M, Bonavina L (2017) Respiratory symptoms and complications of Zenker diverticulum: effect of trans-oral septum stapling. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1391–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verdonck J, Morton RP (2015) Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3095–3107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishaq S, Sultan H, Siau K et al (2018) New and emerging techniques for endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: state-of-the-art review. Dig Endosc 30(4):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain D, Sharma A, Shah M, Patel U, Toshani N, Singhal S (2018) Efficacy and safety of flexible endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller FR, Bartley J, Otto RA (2006) The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling. Laryngoscope 116:1608–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adam SI, Paskhover B, Sasaki CT (2012) Laser versus stapler: outcomes in endoscopic repair of Zenker diverticulum. Laryngoscope 122:1961–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murer K, Soyka MB, Broglie MA, Huber GF, Stoeckli SJ (2015) Zenker’s diverticulum: outcome of endoscopic surgery is dependent on the intraoperative exposure. Eur Arch Othorhinolaryngol 272:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aiolfi A, Scolari F, Saino G, Bonavina L (2015) Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management for Zenker diverticulum. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(2):87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang CW, Liou SS, Netterville JL (2005) Anatomic study of laser-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeus myotomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:897–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Debnam JM, Guha-Thakurta N (2012) Retropharyngeal and prevertebral spaces: anatomic imaging and diagnosis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 45(6):1293–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SZ, SS, and EA made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study, acquisition and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. LB made substantial contribution in data interpretation and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual contents. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Bonavina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Full consent to publish deidentified data was obtained by all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanghì, S., Siboni, S., Asti, E. et al. Endoscopic stapling versus laser for Zenker diverticulum: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 2625–2630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06346-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06346-4

Keywords

Navigation