Skip to main content
Log in

Mastoidectomy dimensions for direct acoustic cochlear implantation: a human cadaveric temporal bone study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the present paper was to acquire information about the mastoidectomy size necessary to obtain an optimal placement of the direct acoustic cochlear implant actuator and fixation system. Ten human cadaveric temporal bones were dissected and implanted with direct acoustic cochlear implant. Mastoidectomy size was determined after implantation in each temporal bone. A bone bed for the receiver/stimulator, mastoidectomy and a large posterior tympanotomy were drilled out. The mastoidectomy was progressively enlarged posteriorly in small steps until the actuator template was judged adequately oriented to enable passage of the rod through the posterior tympanotomy without any contact with the bony walls. The distance between different landmarks in the mastoidectomy was measured. All measured values showed a high degree of consistency, with limited median absolute deviation values. One of the most critical measure, i.e. the distance between the posterior margin of the mastoidectomy to the superior rim of the bony external ear canal wall, ranged from 13 to 16 mm with a median value of 15 mm. Prior knowledge of the ideal size of the mastoidectomy for direct acoustic cochlear implant facilitates the positioning of the fixation system and may save time during implant surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernhard H, Stieger C, Perriard Y (2011) Design of a semi-implantable hearing device for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:420–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Häusler R, Stieger C, Bernhard H, Kompis M (2008) A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation. Audiol Neurootol 13:247–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lenarz T, Zwartenkot JW, Stieger C et al (2013) Multi-center study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 34:1215–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kasic JF, Fredrickson JM (2001) The otologics MET ossicular stimulator. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 34:501–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luers JC, Hüttenbrink K-B, Zahnert T, Bornitz M, Beutner D (2013) Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 34:1005–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenarz T, Verhaert N, Desloovere C, et al (2014) A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol 19:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kludt E, Büchner A, Schwab B, Lenarz T, Maier H (2016) Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants. Hear Res 340:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Christiane D’hondt for her assistance in the English revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Fiorino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no financial relationship for the manuscript and work.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiorino, F., Amadori, M. Mastoidectomy dimensions for direct acoustic cochlear implantation: a human cadaveric temporal bone study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 2155–2160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4504-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4504-0

Keywords

Navigation