Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nutritional status and feeding-tube placement in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer included in an induction chemotherapy-based larynx preservation program

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate the nutritional status and determine its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer included in an induction chemotherapy (ICT)-based larynx preservation program without prophylactic feeding-tube placement. All patients with locally advanced (T3/4, N0-3, M0) hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, technically suitable for total pharyngolaryngectomy, treated by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF)-ICT for larynx preservation at our institution between 2004 and 2013, were included in this retrospective study. Patients’ nutritional status was closely monitored. Enteral nutrition was used if and when a patient was unable to sustain per-oral nutrition and hydration. The impact of nutritional status on clinical outcomes was investigated in univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 53 patients (42 men and 11 women, mean age = 58.6 ± 8.2 years) were included in this study. Six (11.3 %) patients had lost more than 10 % of their usual body weight before therapy. Compared with patients’ usual weight, the mean maximum patient weight loss during therapeutic management was 8.7 ± 4.5 kg. Enteral nutrition was required in 17 patients (32 %). We found no influence of the tested nutritional status-related factors on response to ICT, toxicity of ICT, overall, cause-specific and recurrence-free survival, and on post-therapeutic swallowing outcome. Maximum weight loss was significantly associated with a higher risk of enteral tube feeding during therapy (p = 0.03) and of complications (grade ≥3, p = 0.006) during RT. Without prophylactic feeding-tube placement, approximately one-third of the patients required enteral nutrition. There was no significant impact of nutritional status on oncologic or functional outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li X, Di B, Shang Y, Zhou Y, Cheng J, He Z (2009) Clinicopathologic risk factors for distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1348–1353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirano S, Tateya I, Kitamura M et al (2010) Ten years single institutional experience of treatment for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer in Kyoto University. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 563:56–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agopian B, Dassonville O, Chamorey E et al (2011) Total pharyngolaryngectomy in the 21st century: indications, oncologic and functional outcomes. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 132:209–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefebvre JL, Ang KK (2009) Larynx preservation consensus panel. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations-a consensus panel summary. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:1293–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pointreau Y, Garaud P, Chapet S et al (2009) Randomized trial of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with or without docetaxel for larynx preservation. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:498–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A, Langendijk JA, van der Laan BF, Pruim J, Roodenburg JL (2011) Changes in nutritional status and dietary intake during and after head and neck cancer treatment. Head Neck 33:863–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang MF, Wang HM, Kang CJ et al (2010) Treatment results for hypopharyngeal cancer by different treatment strategies and its secondary primary—an experience in Taiwan. Radiat Oncol 5:91–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Silander E, Nyman J, Bove M, Johansson L, Larsson S, Hammerlid E (2012) Impact of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on malnutrition and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized study. Head Neck 34:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravasco P (2011) Nutritional support in head and neck cancer: how and why? Anticancer Drugs 22:639–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atasoy BM, Yonal O, Demirel B et al (2012) The impact of early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement on treatment completeness and nutritional status in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neil KH, Purdy M, Falk J, Gallo L (1999) The dysphagia outcome and severity scale. Dysphagia 14:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A, van der Laan BF, van Oort RP, Roodenburg JL (2011) Malnutrition and quality of life in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 33:490–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhayani MK, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, Roberts DB, Lewin JS, Lai SY (2013) Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: factors affecting placement and dependence. Head Neck 35:1641–1646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME (2004) Cancer: disease and nutrition are key determinants of patients’ quality of life. Support Care Cancer 12:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams GF, Teo MT, Sen M, Dyker KE, Coyle C, Prestwich RJ (2012) Enteral feeding outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer: a role for a prophylactic gastrostomy? Oral Oncol 48:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Bozec.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bozec, A., Benezery, K., Chamorey, E. et al. Nutritional status and feeding-tube placement in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer included in an induction chemotherapy-based larynx preservation program. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 2681–2687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3785-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3785-4

Keywords

Navigation