Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of swallowing after partial frontolateral laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction for glottic cancer

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate swallowing using a reproducible objective methodology and to seek preoperative factors that could influence swallowing outcomes in patients operated on for partial laryngectomy. Twenty-four patients who underwent partial frontolateral laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction for T1bN0 or T2N0 glottic carcinoma between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Using fiberoptic endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluation, early (15 days postoperatively) and late (2 months postoperatively) scores were obtained for all patients to quantify their swallowing skills. Eighty-three percent of patients achieved at least partial oral feeding at time of hospital discharge and 87.5 % achieved exclusive oral feeding within 2 months postoperatively. Early score was good or excellent in 50 %, average in 4.2 % and poor in 41.8 %. Regarding late scores, 63 % were classified as having a good or excellent late score, 7 patients (29 %) were classified as “middle result” because their time to recover was longer (i.e. between 1 and 2 months postoperatively), and two patients had a poor late score. Finally, at last follow-up, only one patient was partially fed by gastrostomy (180 days after surgery). T stage (p = 0.04) was the only factor influencing early swallowing outcomes and length of hospital stay was longer for poor scores than for good late results (p = 0.02). Our findings show good outcomes in terms of postoperative swallowing. Objective assessment of deglutition is essential for a better understanding of the mechanisms of postoperative swallowing disorders and for patient selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giovanni A, Guelfucci B, Gras R, Yu P, Zanaret M (2001) Partial frontolateral laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction for management of early-stage glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 111(4 Pt 1):663–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Biller HF, Som ML (1977) Vertical partial laryngectomy for glottic carcinoma with posterior subglottic extension. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 86(6 Pt 1):715–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniilidis J, Nikolaou A, Fountzilas G, Sombolos K (1992) Vertical partial laryngectomy: our results after treating 81 cases of T2 and T3 laryngeal carcinomas. J Laryngol Otol 106(4):349–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piquet JJ, Darras JA, Berrier A, Roux X, Garcette L (1986) Functional subtotal laryngectomies with cricohyoidopexy. Technics, indications, results. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 103(6):411–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D (1990) Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for selected supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas. Laryngoscope 100(7):735–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tucker HM, Wood BJ, Levine HL, Katz R (1979) Glottic reconstruction after near total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 89:609–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Makeieff M, Barbotte E, Giovanni A, Guerrier B (2005) Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 115(3):546–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanaret M, Giovanni A, Gras R, Cannoni M (1993) Near total laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction: long-term results in 57 patients. Am J Otolaryngol 14(6):419–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Makeieff M, de la Breteque A, Guerrier B, Giovanni A (2009) Voice handicap evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 119(4):746–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Logemann JA (1998) Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders, 2nd edn. Pro-Ed, Austin, pp 168–180

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ekberg O, Olsson R (1997) Radiological evaluation of the pharynx and larynx during swallowing. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 8:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinar E, Imre A, Calli C, Oncel S, Katilmis H (2012) Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: analyses of oncologic and functional outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. doi:10.1177/0194599812457334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzotto G, Crosetti E, Lucioni M, Succo G (2012) Subtotal laryngectomy: outcomes of 469 patients and proposal of a comprehensive and simplified classification of surgical procedures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1635–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schindler A, Favero E, Nudo S, Albera R, Schindler O, Cavalot AL (2006) Long-term voice and swallowing modifications after supracricoid laryngectomy: objective, subjective, and self-assessment data. Am J Otolaryngol 27:378–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simonelli M, Ruoppolo G, de Vincentiis M et al (2010) Swallowing ability and chronic aspiration after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:873–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewin JS, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, May AH, Roberts DB, Holsinger FC, Diaz EM Jr (2008) Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Head Neck 30:559–566

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benito J, Holsinger FC, Pérez-Martín A, Garcia D, Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O (2011) Aspiration after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: incidence, risk factors, management, and outcomes. Head Neck 33:679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schindler A, Favero E, Capaccio P, Albera R, Cavalot AL, Ottaviani F (2009) Supracricoid laryngectomy: age influence on long-term functional results. Laryngoscope 119:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinini A, Grammatica A et al (2012) Voice and swallowing after partial laryngectomy: factors influencing outcome. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.22946

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Kruis JG, Baijens LW, Speyer R, Zwijnenberg I (2011) Biomechanical analysis of hyoid bone displacement in videofluoroscopy: a systematic review of intervention effects. Dysphagia 26:171–182

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller AJ (1986) Neurophysiological basis of swallowing. Dysphagia 1:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang TG, Chang YC, Chen WS, Lin PH, Hsiao TY (2010) Reduction in hyoid bone forward movement in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:926–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paik NJ, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Jeon JY, Lim JY, Han TR (2008) Movement of the hyoid bone and the epiglottis during swallowing in patients with dysphagia from different etiologies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirai H, Omura K, Harada H, Tohara H (2010) Sequential evaluation of swallowing function in patients with unilateral neck dissection. Head Neck 32:896–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fakhry N, Puymerail L, Michel J et al (2013) Analysis of hyoid bone using 3-D geometric morphometrics: an anatomical study and discussion of potential clinical implications. Dysphagia. doi:10.1007/s00455-013-9457-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest or financial disclosure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Fakhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fakhry, N., Michel, J., Giorgi, R. et al. Analysis of swallowing after partial frontolateral laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction for glottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 2013–2020 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2750-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2750-3

Keywords

Navigation