Skip to main content
Log in

Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the nasal packing and the transseptal suturing techniques regarding the extubation difficulty evaluation scores, follow-up times in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), pain scores, and postoperative complications. Two hundred patients who underwent septoplasty from January 2009 to October 2009 were randomly assigned either to have nasal packs (n: 100) or transeptal sutures (n: 100). In the transseptal suture group, extubation was easier and PACU follow-up times were shorter, when compared to the nasal packing group (p < 0.001). Patients with nasal packing had significantly higher pain scores (p < 0.001). Minor bleeding was significantly higher in the transseptal group with seven cases, compared to the nasal packing group without any bleeding cases (p = 0.014). There were two patients who had postoperative major bleeding, and two patients who had septal hematoma in the transseptal suture group. One patient with nasal packing had postoperative infection. Septal perforation was not seen in any of the cases. While patients in both groups experienced postoperative crusting, patients in the transseptal suture group also complained about foreign body sensation. Extubation was more comfortable; post-anaesthesia monitorization duration was shorter, and postoperative pain was less, but minor bleeding was seen more with transseptal sutures. There was no significant difference in terms of major bleeding, hematoma, infection or perforation. Foreign body sensation was the main cause of postoperative discomfort in the transseptal suture group. Transseptal suturing might be a significantly comfortable, cost-effective and reliable alternative to nasal packing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee IN, Vukovic L (1988) Hemostatic suture for septoplasty: how we do it. J Otolaryngol 17:54–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hari C, Marnane C, Wormald PJ (2008) Quilting sutures for nasal septum. J Laryngol Otol 122:522–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall SI, Chung F (1999) Discharge criteria and complications after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 88:508–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemmens W, Lemkens P (2001) Septal suturing following nasal septoplasty, a valid alternative for nasal packing? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 55:215–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bajaj Y, Kanatas AN, Carr S, Sethi N, Kelly G (2009) Is nasal packing really required after septoplasty? Int J Clin Pract 63:757–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Genç E, Ergin NT, Bilezikçi B (2004) Comparison of suture and nasal packing in rabbit noses. Laryngoscope 114:639–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kula M, Yuce I, Unlu Y, Tutus A, Cagli S, Ketenci I (2010) Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muluk NB, Oğuztürk O, Ekici A, Koç C (2005) Emotional effects of nasal packing measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients following nasal surgery. J Otolaryngol 34:172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogretmenoglu O, Yilmaz T, Rahimi K, Aksöyek S (2002) The effect on arterial blood gases and heart rate of bilateral nasal packing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259:63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildirim A, Yasar M, Bebek AI, Canbay E, Kunt T (2005) Nasal septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty. Am J Rhinol 19:599–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Armengot M, Hernández R, Miguel P, Navarro R, Basterra J (2008) Effect of total nasal obstruction on nocturnal oxygen saturation. Am J Rhinol 22:325–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Regli A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Strobel WM, Pargger H, Welge-Luessen A, Reber A (2006) The impact of postoperative nasal packing on sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal oxygen saturation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Anesth Analg 102:615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Awan MS, Iqbal M (2008) Nasal packing after septoplasty: a randomized comparison of packing versus no packing in 88 patients. Ear Nose Throat J 87:624–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Von Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R (1993) Nasal packing after routine surgery—is it justified? J Laryngol Otol 107:902–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. S. Altuğ Kesikli in correction of the grammatical mistakes and in revision of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rıza Önder Günaydın.

Additional information

The work was conducted in Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Günaydın, R.Ö., Aygenc, E., Karakullukcu, S. et al. Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268, 1151–1156 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1542-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1542-x

Keywords

Navigation