Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective observational study of 363 cases operated with three different harmonic scalpels

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Harmonic ACE™, Harmonic FOCUS™ and harmonic scalpel with 5-mm curved blade in head and neck surgery. During a 15-month period, we performed 295 thyroidectomies, 23 parotidectomies and 45 tonsillectomies using the harmonic scalpel. Control group consisted of 106 thyroidectomies, 9 parotidectomies and 30 tonsillectomies performed with the use of conventional hemostatic techniques. The use of both Harmonic ACE™ and Harmonic FOCUS™ scalpel reduced the time of thyroid and parotid surgery by 20–25%. The use of Harmonic ACE™ reduced the mean time of tonsillectomy, while the use of 5-mm curved blade had no significant effect. Postoperative pain and complication rate were comparable for both the groups. In conclusion, the use of both Harmonic ACE™ and Harmonic FOCUS™ devices significantly reduces operative time in the head and neck procedures and enables a smaller neck skin incision in thyroidectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaral JF (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:255–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. To EW, Pang PC, Lai EC et al (2001) The use of the harmonic scalpel for glossectomy. Br J Plast Surg 54:553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherman JA, Davies HT (2000) Ultracision: the harmonic scalpel and its possible uses in maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:530–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robbins ML, Ferland RJ (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy using the laparoscopic coagulating shears. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists 2:339–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Amaral JF (1994) Ultrasonic dissection. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:181–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiatrak BJ, Willging JP (2002) Harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope 112:14–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hambley R, Hebda PA, Abell E et al (1988) Wound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery, and carbon dioxide laser. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 14:1213–1217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shemen L (2002) Thyroidectomy using the harmonic scalpel: analysis of 105 consecutive cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:284–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koutsoumanis K, Koutras AS, Drimousis PG et al (2007) The use of a harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: report of a 3-year experience. Am J Surg 193:693–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cordón C, Fajardo R, Ramírez J et al (2005) A randomized, prospective, parallel group study comparing the harmonic scalpel to electrocautery in thyroidectomy. Surgery 137:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M et al (2001) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Am J Surg 181:567–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atallah N, Kumar M, Hilali A et al (2000) Post-operative pain in tonsillectomy: bipolar electrodissection technique vs dissection ligation technique. A double-blind randomized prospective trial. J Laryngol Otol 114:667–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willging JP, Wiatrak BJ (2003) Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy in children: a randomized prospective study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leaper M, Mahadevan M, Vokes D et al (2006) A prospective randomised single blinded study comparing harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy with bipolar tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70:1389–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamal SA, Basu S, Kapoor L et al (2006) Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:449–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons SP, Cordes SR, Comer B (2006) Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:106–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Potts KL, Augenstein A, Goldman JL (2005) A parallel group analysis of tonsillectomy using the harmonic scalpel vs electrocautery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1:49–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drago Prgomet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prgomet, D., Janjanin, S., Bilić, M. et al. A prospective observational study of 363 cases operated with three different harmonic scalpels. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 1965–1970 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0954-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0954-3

Keywords

Navigation