Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tympanoplasty in children

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Closure of uncomplicated tympanic membrane perforation (tympanoplasty) is usually a straightforward procedure with a good success rate. Many studies report a success rate from 60 to 99% in adults, whereas a 35–94% success rate in children. The definition of successful tympanoplasty varies from one author to other. Some authors report that an intact tympanic membrane considered a successful surgical result, whereas the other authors may also consider the postoperative hearing, as well as middle ear aeration, as a part of good outcome. This review is an insight into the recent and as well as the past literature on prognostic factors in pediatric tympanoplasty. This article reports an overview of the commonly reported factors which are thought to affect the tympanoplasty in children. Age is considered as one of the most important factor determining the successful outcome of tympanoplasty. Most of the studies did not reveal any significant difference in result between pediatric tympanoplasty from those of adult ones. Interestingly, in one study; it was found that patients younger than 16 years had decreased graft uptake compared with adults. However, in this same study; it was found that the younger patients had better postoperative hearing with better postoperative AB gap closure. The other factors which seem to influence the success rate of tympanoplasty are the size of perforation, technique used, presence or absence of otorrhoea, eustachian tube function and status of the contralateral ear. A study has revealed that posterior perforation had poorer results but it may be a distorted finding as the surgical method was not controlled. Regarding the size of perforation and its influence on the success rate of tympanoplasty, there is again difference of opinion. In one study, it was found that perforations greater than 50% had poorer results, but other studies contradict this statement stating that the success of tympanoplasty has no bearing with the size of perforation. Poor eustachian tube function has been offered as an explanation by some authors as younger age may be correlated with lower tympanoplasty success rates, but some authors refute this by stating that poor eustachian tube function not necessarily an indicator of poor surgical outcome. In conclusion, the success of tympanoplasty in children, with little doubt, depends on a number of factors. The past and recent literature has not produced a consensus of convincing evidence supporting any one parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jahn AF (1991) Chronic otitis media: diagnosis and treatment. Med Clin North Am 75(6):1277–1291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McPherson B, Holborow CA (1985) A study of deafness in West Africa: the Gambian Hearing Health Project. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 10:115–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Daly KA, Hunter LL, Levine SC, Lindgren BR, Giebink GS (1998) Relationships between otitis media sequelae and age. Laryngoscope 108(9):1306–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tos M (1990) Causes of the disease. Ann Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 99(4, Suppl 46):7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tos M (1990) Sequelae of secretory otitis media and the relationship to chronic suppurative otitis media. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol 99(4, Suppl 146):18–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahoney JL (1980) Mass management of otitis media in Zaire. Laryngoscope 90(71):1200–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kenna MA (1994) Treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27(3):457–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith AW, Hatcher J, Mackenzie IJ, Thompson S, Bal J, Mac P, Okoth-Olende C, Oburra H, Wanjohi Z (1996) Randomised control of chronic suppurative otitis media in Kenyan school children. Lancet 348:1128–1133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goycoolea MV, Hueb MM, Ruah C (1991) Definitions and terminology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 24(4):757–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brobby GW, Zadik P (1987) Bacteriology of otitis media in Ghana. Trop Doct 17:91–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brook I, Frazier E (1996) Microbial dynamics of persistent purulent otitis media in children. J Pediatr 128(2):237–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fairbanks D (1981) Antimicrobial therapy for chronic suppurative otitis media. Ann Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 90(3, Suppl 84):58–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mawson S, Pollack M (1988) Special role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic suppurative otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Head Neck Surg 97 (Suppl 130):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kenna M (1988) Etiology and pathogenesis of chronic suppurative otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97(2, Suppl 137):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  15. Browning GG, Gatehouse S (1989) Hearing in chronic suppurative otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 98:245–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chao WY, Wu CC (1994) Hearing impairment in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. J Formos Med Assoc 93(10):866–869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nozza RJ (1990) Audiologic considerations: beyond the threshold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99 (Suppl):34–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Teele DW, Klein JO, Chase C, Menyuk P, Rossner B, The Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group (1990) Otitis media in infancy and intellectual ability, school achievement, speech and language at age 7 years. J Infect Dis 162:658–694

    Google Scholar 

  19. Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner BA, The Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group (1984) Otitis media with effusion during the first three years of life and development of speech and language. Pediatrics 74(2):282–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fishler RS, Todd NW, Feldman CM (1985) Otitis media and language performance in a cohort of Apache Indian children. Am J Dis Child 139(4):355–360

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hubbard TW, Paradise JL, McWilliams BJ, Elster BA, Taylor FH (1985) Consequences of unremitting middle-ear disease in early life: otologic, audiologic, and developmental findings in children with cleft palate. N Eng J Med 312:1529–1534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gibson PG, Stuart JE, Wlodarczyk J, Olson L, Hensley M (1996) Nasal inflammation and chronic ear disease in Australian Aboriginal children. J Paediatr Child Health 32:143–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fliss DM, Shoham I, Leiberman A, Dagan R (1991) Chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma in children in Southern Israel: incidence and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 10:895–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kenna M (1988) Epidemiology and natural history of chronic suppurative otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97(2):8

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization (1998) Prevention of hearing impairment from chronic otitis media. Report of a WHO/CIBA Foundation Workshop. Geneva

  26. Kohan D, Giacchi RJ (1999) Otologic surgery in patients with HIV-1 and AIDS. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(4):355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. World Development Report (1993) Investing in Health. World Bank/World Health Organization, Washington DC

  28. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) DALYs by age, sex and cause (thousands). In: Murray CJL, Lopez AD (eds) Global burden of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 541–576

    Google Scholar 

  29. Palva T, Ramsay H (1995) Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty results related to training and experience. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 20:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Inwood JL, Wallace HC, Clarke SE (2003) Endaural or postaural incision for myringoplasty; does it make a difference to the patient? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28:396–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Koch WM, Friedman EM, McGill TJ, Healy GB (1990) Tympanopolasty in children. The Boston Children’s Hospital experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:35–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. MacDonald RRIII, Lusk RP, Muntz HR (1994) Fasciaform myringoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:138–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shih L, de Tar T, Crabtree JA (1991) Myringoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 015:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friedberg J, Gills T (1980) Tympanoplasty in children. J Otolaryngol 9:165–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Raine CH, Singh SD (1983) Tympanoplasty in children. A review of 114 cases. J Laryngol Otol 97:217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ (1999) Meta-analysis of paediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:530–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Young M, Newman C, Vowler SL (2007) A longitudinal study on paediatric tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:353–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Umapathy N, Dekker PJ (2003) Myringoplatsy: is it worth performing in children? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:1053–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Merenda D, Koike K, Shafiei M, Ramadan H (2007) Tympanometric volume: a predictor of success of tympanoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:189–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Albera R, Ferrero V, Lacilla M, Canale A (2006) Tympanic perforation in myringoplasty: evaluation of prognostic factors. Ann Otol Laryngol 115:875–879

    Google Scholar 

  41. Emir H, Ceylan K, Kizilkaya Z et al (2007) Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty: influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 624:595–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N (2005) Tympanoplasty type 1 in children an evaluative study. Int J Paedtr Otolaryngol 69:1071–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pignataro L, Grillo Della Beta L, Cappacio P, Zaghis A (2001) Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 115:369–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP (2002) Myringoplasty: does size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC et al (2005) A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 30:115–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Denoyelle F, Roger G, Chauvin P, Garabedian EN (1999) Myringoplasty in children: predictive factors of outcome. Laryngoscope 109:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Uyar Y, Keles B, Koc S et al (2006) Tympanoplasty in paediatric patients. Int J Paediatr Otolaryngol 70:1805–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Carr MM, Poje CP, Nagyl ML et al (2001) Success rates in pediatric tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol 30:199–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E (2007) Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(9):985–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Collins WO, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ, Buchman CA (2003) Paediatric tympanoplasty: effect of contralateral ear status no outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:646–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chandrashekhar SS, House JW, Devgan U (1995) Paediatric tympanoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:873–878

    Google Scholar 

  52. Caylan R, Titiz A, Falconi M et al (1998) Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome. Otlaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:709–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Manning SC, Cantekin EI, Kenna MA, Bluestone CD (1987) Prognostic value of eustachian tube function in paediatric tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 97:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Megerian CA (2000) Paediatric tympanoplasty and the role of preoperative eustachian tube evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1039–1041

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Todd NW (2000) There are no accurate tests for eustachian tube function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1041–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Westerman ST (2000) Tasting instilled otologic drops is not a reliable test of eustachian tube function. Arch Otlaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1042

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Vartiainen E, Vartiainen J (1997) Tympanoplasty in young patients: the role of adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:583–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Per Cayé-Thomasen, Sven-Eric Stangerup, Gita Jørgensen, Dominika Drozdziewic, Per Bonding, Mirko Tos (2008) Myringotomy versus ventilation tubes in secretory otitis media: eardrum pathology, hearing, and eustachian tube function 25 years after treatment. Otol Neurotol 2008: May 23: 18520632 (P,S,G,E,B,D)

  59. El-Bitar MA, Pena MT, Choi SS, Zalzal GH (2002) Retained ventilation tubes: should they be removed at 2 years? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:1357–1360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Saito T, Iwaki E, Kohno Y et al (1996) Prevention of persistent ear drum perforation after long term ventilation tube treatment for otitis media with effusion in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 38:31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Schraff SA, Markham J, Welch C et al (2006) Outcome in children with perforated tympanic membranes after tympanostomy tube placement: results using a pilot treatment algorithm. Am J Otolaryngol 27:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Adkins AP, Friedman EJ (2005) Surgical indications and outcomes of tympanostomy tube removal. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:1047–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan, Kolkata, India

    Saurav Sarkar, A. Roychoudhury & B. K. Roychaudhuri

  2. 55, Bhagawati Chatterjee Street, Kolkata, 700056, West Bengal, India

    Saurav Sarkar

Authors
  1. Saurav Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Roychoudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. K. Roychaudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurav Sarkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, S., Roychoudhury, A. & Roychaudhuri, B.K. Tympanoplasty in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 627–633 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0908-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0908-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation