Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the MR compatibility of the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant by performing in vitro and in vivo tests. All tests were performed on 1.5 T machine. Torque and force were measured to observe a potential displacement of the internal receiver. Demagnetisation of the internal magnet was monitored inside the MRI scanner and outside the MRI scanner (in the MRI room). Potential-induced voltage on electrodes was measured in vitro, performing the usual MR sequences. Heating around the internal receiver was measured after the same MR sequences. Following in vitro tests, in vivo MR imaging (brain and posterior fossa MRI) was performed to evaluate the induced signal void and geometrical distortion. In vivo test was performed with one volunteer who had a cochlear implant device fixed to the surface of the skin with a bandage. All the in vitro tests were in compliance with standard EN 45502-2-3 relating to Cochlear Implants. In vivo MRI scans demonstrated an image distortion for spin echo sequences of 7 cm maximum around the internal magnet. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant is possible with no measurable adverse effects for either the patient or the device. Image artefact around the internal magnet, however, is unavoidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hochmair E (2001) MRI safety of Med-El C40/C40+ cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2:98–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Youssefzadeh S, Baumgartner W, Dorffner R et al (1998) MR compatibility of Med El cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:346–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner W, Youssefzadeh S, Hamzavi J et al (2001) Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging in 30 cochlear implant patients. Otol Neurotol 22:818–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heller JW, Brackmann DE, Tucci DL, et al (1996) Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants. Am J Otol 17:724–729

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair E et al (1998) Cochlear implants: in vitro investigations of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging—compatibility and safety aspects. Radiology 208:700–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber BP, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T et al (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 19:584–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wackym PA, Michel MA, Prost RW et al (2004) Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi40+ cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 114:1355–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gubbels SP, McMenomey SO (2006) Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Laryngoscope 116:865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank B. Friess and O. Le Caharec for their help in this study and P. Jeffrey for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Vincent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, C., Ruzza, I., Vaneecloo, F.M. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265, 1043–1046 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0576-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0576-6

Keywords

Navigation