Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can axillary lymphadenectomy be avoided in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy? Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) can currently be avoided in those patients with a low tumor load (LTL) and/or a low-risk profile that tested with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Our objective is to identify prognostic factors that significantly influence axillary lymph node involvement to identify patients who could benefit from surgery without axillary lymphadenectomy.

Methods

This is an observational retrospective study of consecutive patients diagnosed and operated of breast cancer between 2000 and 2014 at University Hospital La Ribera (UHR).

Results

The size of the sample was 1641 patients, from which 1174 underwent SLNB. In the multivariate analysis, we objectify a raise of risk of positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) up to 5.2% for every millimeter of increase. The risk of positive SLNB when showing lymphovascular invasion seems to be 2.80 times greater but becomes lower when SLN involvement appears in luminal A, luminal B and triple-negative types, regarding HER2. In case of triple negatives, the difference is statistically significant. 16.7% present affected additional lymph nodes. The proportion of patients with affected additional lymph nodes increase dramatically above OSNA values of 12,000 copies/μl of CK19 mRNA and it depends on tumor size and lymphovascular infiltration.

Conclusions

Tumors smaller than 5 cm whose OSNA SLNB analysis is less than 12,000 copies/μl of CK19 mRNA have a low chance to develop additional affected lymph nodes, thus cALND can be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

cALND:

Completion axillary lymph node dissection

SLNB:

Sentinel lymph node biopsy

SLN:

Sentinel lymph node

LTL:

Low tumor load

NSLN:

Non-sentinel lymph node

DFS:

Disease-free survival

References

  1. Zubor P, Kubatka P, Kapustova I et al (2018) Current approaches in the clinical management of pregnancy-associated breast cancer-pros and cons. EPMA J 9(3):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-018-0139-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernet L et al (2014) Consenso sobre la biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela en el cáncer de mama. Revisión 2013 de la Sociedad Española de Senología y Patología Mamaria. Revisión 2013 de la Sociedad Espanola ˜ de Senología y Patología Mamaria. Rev Esp Patol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patol.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manca G, Rubello D, Tardelli E, Giammarile F, Mazzarri S, Boni G et al (2016) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: indications, contraindications, and controversies. Clin Nucl Med 41(2):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000000985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noguchi M, Morioka E, Ohno Y et al (2013) The changing role of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 20:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0416-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Invernizzi M, Michelotti A, Noale M et al (2019) Breast cancer systemic treatments and upper limb lymphedema: a risk-assessment platform encompassing tumor-specific pathological features reveals the potential role of trastuzumab. J Clin Med 8(2):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020138

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jud SM, Hatko R, Maihöfner C, Bani MR, Schrauder MG, Lux MP et al (2014) Comprehensive visualization of paresthesia in breast cancer survivols. Arch Gynecol Obstret 290:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3164-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. The senior Guildford breast surgeons (2013) Results of a national training programme in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 100(5):654–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giżewska A, Witkowska-Patena E, Osiecki S, Mazurek A, Stembrowicz-Nowakowska Z, Dziuk M (2017) Utility of single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography for sentinel lymph node localization in breast cancer patients. Nuclear Med Commun 38(6):493–499. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN, Skelly JM, Anderson SJ, Harlow SP et al (2011) Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364:412–421. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1008108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jinno H, Sakata M, Asaga S, Wada M, Shimada T, Kitagawa Y et al (2008) Predictors to assess non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis. Breast J 14:551–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00646.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tapia G, Ying V, Di Re A, Stellin A, Cai T, Warrier S (2019) Predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Australian breast cancer patients: are the nomograms still useful in the post-Z0011 era? ANZ J Surg 89:712–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao SS, Patra R, Sonnathi Y (2017) Clinical study of co-relation between positive axillary lymph node status and size of the tumor in breast malignancies. Arch Int Surg 7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.4103/ais.ais_15_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Orang E, Marzony ET, Afsharfard A (2013) Predictive role of tumor size in breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement—can size of primary tumor be used to omit an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection? Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevent. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang S, Kirova YM, Shan S-C, Cai G, Ou D, Cao L et al (2018) Different radiation techniques to deliver therapeutic dose to the axilla in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer: doses, techniques challenges and clinical considerations. Cancer/Radiothérapie Diciembre de 22(8):767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2018.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dihge L, Bendahl PO, Rydén L (2017) Nomograms for preoperative prediction of axillary nodal status in breast cancer. Br J Surg 104(11):1494–1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Corso G, Galimberti V, Veronesi P (2020) De-escalation treatment of axilla in breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 22:445–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02129-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2010) Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Van la Parra RFD, Peer PGM, Ernst MF, Bosscha K (2011) Meta-analysis of predictive factors for nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SLN. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meretoja TJ, Audisio RA, Heikkilä PS, Bori R, Sejben I, Regitnig P et al (2013) International multicenter tool to predict the risk of four or more tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with sentinel node macrometastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat Abril de 138(3):817–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2468-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fung V, Kohlhardt S, Vergani P, Zardin GJ, Williams NR (2017) Intraoperative prediction of the two axillary lymph node macrometastases threshold in patients with breast cancer using a one-step nucleic acid cytokeratin-19 amplification assay. Mol Clin Oncol. Noviembre de 7(5):755–762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Terrenato I, D’Alicandro V, Casini B, Perracchio L, Rollo F, De Salvo L et al (2017) A cut-off of 2150 cytokeratin 19 mRNA copy number in sentinel lymph node may be a powerful predictor of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0171517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Piñero-Madrona A, Ruiz-Merino G, Bernet L, Miguel-Martínez B, Vicente-García F, Viguri-Díaz MA et al (2014) Tumoral load quantification of positive sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer to predict more than two involved nodes. The Breast Diciembre de 23(6):859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubota M, Komoike Y, Hamada M, Shinzaki W, Azumi T, Hashimoto Y et al (2016) One-step nucleic acid amplification assay for intraoperative prediction of advanced axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis. Mol Clin Oncol Febrero de 4(2):173–178. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2015.694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohi Y, Umekita Y, Sagara Y, Rai Y, Yotsumoto D, Matsukata A et al (2012) Whole sentinel lymph node analysis by a molecular assay predicts axillary node status in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 107:1239–1243. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Espinosa-Bravo M, Sansano I, Pérez-Hoyos S, Ramos M, Sancho M, Xercavins J et al (2013) Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer by assessing total tumoral load in the sentinel lymph node by molecular assay. Eur J Surg Oncol EJSO Julio de 39(7):766–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Peg V, Sansano I, Vieites B, Bernet L, Cano R, Córdoba A et al (2017) Role of total tumour load of sentinel lymph node on survival in early breast cancer patients. The Breast Junio de 33:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P et al (2016) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: long-term follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial. Ann Surg Septiembre de 264(3):413–420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Francissen CMTP, Dings PJM, van Dalen T, Strobbe LJA, van Laarhoven HWM, de Wilt JHW (2012) Axillary recurrence after a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary treatment: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol Diciembre de 19(13):4140–4149. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2490-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li CZ, Zhang P, Li RW, Wu CT, Zhang XP, Zhu HC (2015) Axillary lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy alone for early breast cancer with sentinel node metastasis: a meta-analysis. EurJ Surg Oncol EJSO Agosto de 41(8):958–966. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2490-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We do not have any source of funding for research and/or publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Martinez Alcaide.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Yes.

Informed consent

Not necessary. It is a retrospective study that does not include patient names.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alcaide, S.M., Diana, C.A.F., Herrero, J.C. et al. Can axillary lymphadenectomy be avoided in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy? Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306, 2123–2131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06556-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06556-7

Keywords

Navigation