Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of levator ani avulsion in a multicenter study (PAMELA study)

  • Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective is to determine the prevalence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion using four-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and according to delivery mode.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter study included 322 women evaluated at 6–12 months postpartum by four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound to identify levator ani muscle avulsion. The researcher who performed the ultrasound was blinded to all clinical data. Meaningful data about the birth were also recorded: mode of delivery, mother’s age and body mass index, duration of second stage, episiotomy, perineal tearing, anesthesia, assistant, head circumference and fetal weight.

Results

303 volumes were valid for evaluation. The overall prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was 18.8% (95% CI 14.4–23.2%). In our multivariate analysis, only mode of delivery reached statistical significance as a risk factor for levator ani muscle avulsion (p < 0.001). The prevalence according to the different modes of delivery was 7.8% in spontaneous delivery, 28.8% in vacuum-assisted and 51.1% in forceps-assisted delivery. Compared with spontaneous delivery, the OR for LAM avulsion was 12.31 with forceps (CI 95% 5.65–26.80) and 4.78 with vacuum-assisted delivery (CI 95% 2.15–10.63).

Conclusions

Levator ani avulsion during vaginal delivery in primiparous women occurs in nearly one in every five deliveries. Delivery mode is a significant and modifiable intrapartum risk factor for this lesion. The incidence is lower in spontaneous delivery and significantly increases when an instrument is used to assist delivery, especially forceps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Markland AD (2014) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol 123:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL (2009) On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11:163–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG 117:1485–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lien KC, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA (2009) Biomechanical analyses of the efficacy of patterns of maternal effort on second-stage progress. Obstet Gynecol 113:873–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Svabík K, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2009) How much does the levator hiatus have to stretch during childbirth? BJOG 116:1657–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V (2005) Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz HP, Shek C, De Leon J, Steensma AB (2008) Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:676–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz HP (2007) Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calderwood CS, Thurmond A, Holland A, Osmundsen B, Gregory WT (2018) Comparing 3-dimensional ultrasound to 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of levator ani defects. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:586.e1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blasi I, Fuchs I, D'Amico R, Vinci V, La Sala GB, Mazza V, Henrich W (2011) Intrapartum translabial three-dimensional ultrasound visualization of levator trauma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:88–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Brown C, Guzman Rojas R, Langer S, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2018) Can pelvic floor trauma be predicted antenatally? Acta Obstet Obstet Gynecol Scand 97:751–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassadó Garriga J, Pessarrodona Isern A, Espuña Pons M, Duran Retamal M, Felgueroso Fabrega A, Rodriguez Carballeira M, Jordà Santamaria I (2011) Four-dimensional sonographic evaluation of avulsion of the levator ani according to delivery mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:701–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahmanou P, Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Dietz HP (2016) The association between maternal age at first delivery and risk of obstetric trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:451.e1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinho N, Friedman T, Turel F, Robledo K, Riccetto C, Dietz HP (2019) Birthweight and pelvic floor trauma after vaginal childbirth. Int Urogynecol J 30:985–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, Lavy Y, Cohen SM, Yagel S (2009) Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator animuscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 201:91.e1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A, Guzman Rojas R, Langer S, Shek K, Dietz HP (2017) Intrapartum predictors of maternal levator ani injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz HP, Wilson PD, Milsom I (2016) Maternal birth trauma: why should it matter to urogynaecologists? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 28:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP (2019) Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 30:901–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sultan AH (1999) Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 5:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dietz HP, Shek KL (2009) Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: which levels matter most? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:698–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dietz HP, Abbu A, Shek KL (2008) The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:941–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Siafarikas F, Staer-Jensen J, Braekken IH, Bo K, Engh ME (2013) Learning process for performing and analyzing 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging and interobserver reliability study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:312–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG 113:225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Roem J, Muñoz A, Dietz HP (2019) Pelvic floor disorders after obstetric avulsion of the levator ani muscle. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 25:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Kluivers K (2014) Levator ani muscle avulsion during childbirth: a risk prediction model. BJOG 121:1155–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kearney R, Fitzpatrick M, Brennan S, Behan M, Miller J, Keane D, O'Herlihy C, DeLancey JO (2010) Levator ani injury in primiparous women with forceps delivery for fetal distress, forceps for second stage arrest, and spontaneous delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 111:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Speksnijder L, Oom DMJ, Van Bavel J, Steegers EAP, Steensma AB (2019) Association of levator injury and urogynecological complaints in women after their first vaginal birth with and without mediolateral episiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220:93.e1–93.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cassadó J, Pessarrodona A, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Hinojosa L, Manrique G, Marquez A, Macias M (2014) Does episiotomy protect against injury of the levator ani muscle in normal vaginal delivery? Neurourol Urodyn 33:1212–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO (2006) Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 107:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sainz JA, Martín-Martínez A, González-Diaz E, Fernández-Fernández C, Ortega I, Medina M, Fernández-Corona A, Fernández-Palacín A, García-Mejido JA (2019) Influence of the disengagement of the forceps on levator ani muscle injuries in instrumental delivery: a multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. García Mejido JA, Aquise Pino A, Fernández Palacín A, de la Fuente VP, Ramos Vega Z, Sainz Bueno JA (2018) The correlation between the type of forceps application and the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion: a prospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn 37:1731–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Memon HU, Blomquist JL, Dietz HP, Pierce CB, Weinstein MM, Handa VL (2015) Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 125:1080–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JC and MS project development, data collection, manuscript writing and editing. NR, OP, EH, IM, MG and RF data collection. IG statistical analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Cassadó.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cassadó, J., Simó, M., Rodríguez, N. et al. Prevalence of levator ani avulsion in a multicenter study (PAMELA study). Arch Gynecol Obstet 302, 273–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05585-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05585-4

Keywords

Navigation