Abstract
Purpose
To analyze the current management and use of fertility preservation (FP) treatments among different gynecologic oncology centers in Spain
Methods
From March to April 2019, a transversal study was conducted using a national online survey to consultants registered in the section of Gynecologic Oncology of the Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The survey contained 30 questions that assessed the perceptions and attitudes towards fertility-sparing strategies as well as its management in each participating center.
Results
A total of 51 responders from 12 out of 17 geographical regions of Spain answered the survey. According to 35 responders (68.63%), the age limit for offering FP was 40 years. In most of the centers, an ovarian reserve study is carried out prior to a FP procedure (34 responders, 66.67%). In cervical cancer size, limit for offering trachelectomy is 2 cm (40 responders, 78.43%), with LVSI as an exclusion factor for 26 (51%). Twenty-four (48.98%) responders reported that FP only in ovarian cancer stages IA, 12 (24.49%) also in stages IB, and an additional 13 (26.53%) up to stages IC. Most responders perform FP only in the absence of myometrial infiltration (30, 58.82%) in patients with g1–g2 endometrial cancer.
Conclusions
The performance of professionals at the national level is uneven, demonstrating the need for referral centers to ensure optimal management. International guidelines should be more widely extended throughout Spain to homogenize the treatment of young oncology patients who wish to have children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayhan A, Reed N, Gultekin M, Dursun P (eds) (2017) Textbook of gynaecological oncology, 4th edn. ESGO (European Society of Gynaecological Oncology).
Cancer Statistics Review. 1975–2015—SEER Statistics. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2015/. Accessed Sept 2019
Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A, Chargari C, Leary A, Morice P (2016) Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 17(6):e240–e253
Zapardiel I, Diestro MD, Aletti G (2014) Conservative treatment of early stage ovarian cancer: oncological and fertility outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(4):387–393
Simpson AN, Feigenberg T, Clarke BA, Gien LT, Ismiil N, Laframboise S et al (2014) Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin. Gynecol Oncol 133(2):229–233
Robova H, Halaska MJ, Pluta M, Skapa P, Matecha J, Lisy J et al (2014) Oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 135(2):213–216
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177007&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573002. Accessed Sept 2019
Oncoguía SEGO (2018) Cáncer de cuello uterino. Guías de práctica clínica en cáncer ginecológico y mamario. Publicaciones SEGO
Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C et al (2018) The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(4):641–655
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904
Willows K, Lennox G, Covens A (2016) Fertility-sparing management in cervical cancer: balancing oncologic outcomes with reproductive success. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract 3(1):9
Helpman L, Grisaru D, Covens A (2011) Early adenocarcinoma of the cervix: Is radical vaginal trachelectomy safe? Gynecol Oncol 123(1):95–98
Zusterzeel PLM, Pol FJM, van Ham M, Zweemer RP, Bekkers RLM, Massuger LFAG et al (2016) Vaginal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: increased recurrence risk for adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(7):1293–1299
Agarwal S, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Sun CC, Nick A, Dos Reis R et al (2011) Outcomes of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer of high-risk histological subtypes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(1):123–127
Ditto A, Martinelli F, Lorusso D, Haeusler E, Carcangiu M, Raspagliesi F (2014) Fertility sparing surgery in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 25(4):320
Thomakos N, Malakasis A, Machairiotis N, Zarogoulidis P, Rodolakis A (2018) Fertility sparing management in non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Which patients, what procedure and what outcome? J Cancer 9(24):4659–4664
Gershenson DM (2017) Management of borderline ovarian tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 41:49–59
Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A, Pautier P, Leary A, Colombo N et al (2016) Fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of oncological issues. Ann Oncol 27(11):1994–2004
Uzan C, Courbiere B, Chabbert-Buffet N (2019) Tumeurs épithéliales de l’ovaire : préservation de la fertilité. Article rédigé sur la base de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques en cancérologie intitulée « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d’un cancer épithélial de l’ovaire » élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY sous l’égide du CNGOF et labellisée par l’INCa. Gynécol Obs Fertil Sénol 47(2):180–186
Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Mizuno M, Hosono S, Kawai M, Nagasaka T et al (2011) Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: is it possible? Hum Reprod 26(12):3297–3302
Park J-Y, Suh D-S, Kim J-H, Kim Y-M, Kim Y-T, Nam J-H (2016) Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery among young women with FIGO stage I clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 134(1):49–52
Chiva L, Lapuente F, González-Cortijo L, Carballo N, García JF, Rojo A et al (2008) Sparing fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111(2):S101–S104
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J et al (2016) ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(1):2–30
Koskas M, Uzan J, Luton D, Rouzier R, Daraï E (2014) Prognostic factors of oncologic and reproductive outcomes in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 101(3):785.e3–794.e3
Kesic V, Rodolakis A, Denschlag D, Schneider A, Morice P, Amant F et al (2010) Fertility preserving management in gynecologic cancer patients: the need for centralization. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(9):1613–1619
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MG: review of the literature, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and approval of the final draft. AT, AG-M: data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and approval of the final draft. SA and AH: manuscript preparation and approval of the final draft. BG-I and IZ: conception and design of the study, data interpretation, review of the literature, critical review, and approval of the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have neither commercial, proprietary, not financial interests in the products and companies described in this article.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorostidi, M., Gil-Ibañez, B., Alonso, S. et al. Fertility preservation treatment of gynecological cancer patients in Spain: a national survey (GOFER study). Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 793–800 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05468-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05468-8