Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome and prognosis in uterine sarcoma and malignant mixed Mullerian tumor

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is low evidence regarding the optimal treatment in patients with uterine sarcomas and malignant mixed Mullerian tumors (MMMTs). This study provides an overview of experience at our center with patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma and MMMT, in relation to the clinical management and outcome.

Methods

The medical records for 143 patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), and high-grade (undifferentiated) endometrial sarcoma (UES) and MMMT were reviewed. All available clinical and pathological data were collected and analyzed. Putative prognostic factors were entered into a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards ratio model, and survival data were calculated.

Results

The 5-year overall survival rates were significantly different between patients with ESS, LMS, and UES and MMMT (86 vs. 40 vs. 57 vs. 45 %; P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that the patients’ age, higher FIGO stage (III–IV), a history of smoking, prior pelvic radiation, diabetes, and residual tumor after surgery were associated with a poorer overall survival. Histological subtypes of LMS (HR 4.68; 95 % CI 1.35–16.17), UES (HR 1.21; 95 % CI 0.26–5.77) and MMMT (HR 1.63; 95 % CI 0.42–6.43) were also associated with a poorer overall survival than ESS (P = 0.008). Adjuvant therapies showed no associations with overall survival.

Conclusions

Adjuvant therapy has so far not shown any overall survival benefit, and the focus is therefore on primary surgery. In future studies, the entities should be investigated separately in relation to prognostic factors and effective therapeutic management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Angelo E, Prat J (2010) Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol 116(1):131–139. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks SE, Zhan M, Cote T, Baquet CR (2004) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989–1999. Gynecol Oncol 93(1):204–208. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kernochan LE, Garcia RL (2009) Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumor) of the uterus: advances in elucidation of biologic and clinical characteristics. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7(5):550–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez-Garcia MA, Palacios J (2010) Pathologic and molecular features of uterine carcinosarcomas. Semin Diagn Pathol 27(4):274–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prat J (2009) FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(3):177–178. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barney B, Tward JD, Skidmore T, Gaffney DK (2009) Does radiotherapy or lymphadenectomy improve survival in endometrial stromal sarcoma? Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(7):1232–1238. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181b33c9a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Callister M, Ramondetta LM, Jhingran A, Burke TW, Eifel PJ (2004) Malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(3):786–796. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01561-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garg G, Shah JP, Kumar S, Bryant CS, Munkarah A, Morris RT (2010) Ovarian and uterine carcinosarcomas: a comparative analysis of prognostic variables and survival outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(5):888–894. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181dc8292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, Lin L (2008) Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol 111(1):82–88. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelmus M, Penault-Llorca F, Guillou L, Collin F, Bertrand G, Trassard M, Leroux A, Floquet A, Stoeckle E, Thomas L, MacGrogan G (2009) Prognostic factors in early-stage leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(3):385–390. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1bfbc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schick U, Bolukbasi Y, Thariat J, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Kuten A, Igdem S, Caglar H, Ozsaran Z, Lossl K, Schleicher U, Zwahlen D, Villette S, Vees H (2012) Outcome and prognostic factors in endometrial stromal tumors: a Rare Cancer Network study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):e757–e763. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarcoma of the uterus. Guideline of German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2 k-Leve, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, August 2015). http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/II/015-074.html

  13. Benito V, Lubrano A, Arencibia O, Andujar M, Alvarez E, Medina N, Falcon JM, Falcon O (2009) Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine sarcomas from a single institution in the Canary Islands. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(1):44–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Romanini A, Genazzani AR (2008) The management of patients with uterine sarcoma: a debated clinical challenge. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 65(2):129–142. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Khalfaoui K, du Bois A, Heitz F, Kurzeder C, Sehouli J, Harter P (2014) Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 6(1):21–28. doi:10.1177/1758834013513314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Harter P, El-Khalfaoui K, Heitz F, du Bois A (2014) Operative and conservative treatment of uterine sarcomas. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 74(3):267–270. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li AJ, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Drake R, Byun SY, Rojas F, Barbuto D, Klipfel N, Edmonds P, Miller DS, Karlan BY (2005) Ovarian preservation in stage I low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. Obstet Gynecol 106(6):1304–1308. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000185511.91694.1e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giuntoli RL 2nd, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS, Cha SS, Sloan JA, Keeney GL, Gostout BS (2003) Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 89(3):460–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reich O, Winter R, Regauer S (2005) Should lymphadenectomy be performed in patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma? Gynecol Oncol 97(3):982. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riopel J, Plante M, Renaud MC, Roy M, Tetu B (2005) Lymph node metastases in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 96(2):402–406. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Soumarova R, Horova H, Seneklova Z, Ruzickova J, Horova I, Budikova M, Slampa P, Kalabova R (2002) Treatment of uterine sarcoma. A survey of 49 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(2):92–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmstrom H, Scarfone G, Poveda A, Pecorelli S, Tateo S, Franchi M, Jobsen JJ, Coens C, Teodorovic I, Vergote I, Vermorken JB, European Organisation for R, Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer G (2008) Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer 44 (6):808–818. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.019

  23. Omura GA, Blessing JA, Major F, Lifshitz S, Ehrlich CE, Mangan C, Beecham J, Park R, Silverberg S (1985) A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 3(9):1240–1245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pautier P, Floquet A, Gladieff L, Bompas E, Ray-Coquard I, Piperno-Neumann S, Selle F, Guillemet C, Weber B, Largillier R, Bertucci F, Opinel P, Duffaud F, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Delcambre C, Isambert N, Kerbrat P, Netter-Pinon G, Pinto N, Duvillard P, Haie-Meder C, Lhomme C, Rey A (2013) A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with localized uterine sarcomas (SARCGYN study). A study of the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol 24(4):1099–1104. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pervaiz N, Colterjohn N, Farrokhyar F, Tozer R, Figueredo A, Ghert M (2008) A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer 113(3):573–581. doi:10.1002/cncr.23592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amant F, De Knijf A, Van Calster B, Leunen K, Neven P, Berteloot P, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Moerman P (2007) Clinical study investigating the role of lymphadenectomy, surgical castration and adjuvant hormonal treatment in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Br J Cancer 97(9):1194–1199. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Clayton Smith D, Kenneth Macdonald O, Gaffney DK (2008) The impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on survival in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 88(2):227–232. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wright JD, Seshan VE, Shah M, Schiff PB, Burke WM, Cohen CJ, Herzog TJ (2008) The role of radiation in improving survival for early-stage carcinosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(5):536.e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.019

  29. Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, Mannel RS, Lee YC, Futoran RJ, Cohn DE, Ioffe OB (2007) A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I–IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 107(2):177–185. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolfson AH, Wolfson DJ, Sittler SY, Breton L, Markoe AM, Schwade JG, Houdek PV, Averette HE, Sevin BU, Penalver M et al (1994) A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors for predicting outcome in uterine sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 52(1):56–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Olah KS, Gee H, Blunt S, Dunn JA, Kelly K, Chan KK (1991) Retrospective analysis of 318 cases of uterine sarcoma. Eur J Cancer 27(9):1095–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kokawa K, Nishiyama K, Ikeuchi M, Ihara Y, Akamatsu N, Enomoto T, Ishiko O, Motoyama S, Fujii S, Umesaki N (2006) Clinical outcomes of uterine sarcomas: results from 14 years worth of experience in the Kinki district in Japan (1990–2003). Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(3):1358–1363. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00536.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peters WA 3rd, Kumar NB, Fleming WP, Morley GW (1984) Prognostic features of sarcomas and mixed tumors of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol 63(4):550–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Park JY, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH (2008) Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989–2007. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134(12):1277–1287. doi:10.1007/s00432-008-0422-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. D’Angelo E, Spagnoli LG, Prat J (2009) Comparative clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of uterine sarcomas diagnosed using the World Health Organization classification system. Hum Pathol 40(11):1571–1585. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.03.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Denschlag D, Masoud I, Stanimir G, Gilbert L (2007) Prognostic factors and outcome in women with uterine sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(1):91–95. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nordal RR, Kristensen GB, Kaern J, Stenwig AE, Pettersen EO, Trope CG (1996) The prognostic significance of surgery, tumor size, malignancy grade, menopausal status, and DNA ploidy in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 62(2):254–259. doi:10.1006/gyno.1996.0224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan JK, Kawar NM, Shin JY, Osann K, Chen LM, Powell CB, Kapp DS (2008) Endometrial stromal sarcoma: a population-based analysis. Br J Cancer 99(8):1210–1215. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Blom R, Malmstrom H, Guerrieri C (1999) Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 17 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 9(2):98–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Abeler VM, Royne O, Thoresen S, Danielsen HE, Nesland JM, Kristensen GB (2009) Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology 54(3):355–364. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03231.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferguson SE, Tornos C, Hummer A, Barakat RR, Soslow RA (2007) Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31(11):1653–1661. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181161ba3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Burghaus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burghaus, S., Halmen, S., Gass, P. et al. Outcome and prognosis in uterine sarcoma and malignant mixed Mullerian tumor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 343–351 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3993-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3993-6

Keywords

Navigation