Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal invasive treatment options in pregnant women with ovarian vein syndrome

  • Materno-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the treatment modalities of symptomatic ovarian vein syndrome in pregnancy.

Methods

In our study, we included 12 pregnant women with right ureter and kidney dilatation; caused by ureteric obstruction. In 11 out of 12, we insert a DJ stent and in one woman we applied percutaneous nephrostomy, because of intermittent abdominal pain, resistant on analgetic therapy or feverish pyelonephritis. DJ stents and nephrostomy were inserted under ultrasound guidance without anaesthesia.

Results

After insertion of DJ stents, respective percutaneous nephrostomy colic attacks went back immediately and the feverish pyelonephritis in few days. At no time during these procedures, there was a risk for pregnancy.

Conclusion

Ovarian vein syndrome in pregnancy can lead to violent colic pain and can become complicated by accompanied pyelonephritis. In these cases insertion of a DJ stent or percutaneous nephrostomy under ultrasound guidance is possible and safe, and leads to an improvement of complaints immediately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvis G (1985) Right ovarian vein syndrome. Ann Urol 19(1):65–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ameuer A, Lezrek M, Boymdin H, Jira H, Beddouch A, Abbar M (2002) Right ovarian vein syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature. Ann Urol 36(6):368–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhutta HY, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Walsh CA, Clarke JM (2009) Ovarian vein syndrome: a review. Int J Surg 7(6):516–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark J (1964) The right ovarian vein syndrome. In: Emmett J (ed) Clinical urography: an atlas and textbook of roentgenologic diagnosis, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcondes Pereira R, Ferreira AA, Lane E (1969) Diagnosis of the right ovarian vein syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 103(6):888–889

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meiraz D, Savir A (1981) Ovarian vein syndrome. J Urol 125(5):737–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah MS, Tozzo PJ (1974) Right ovarian vein syndrome. Urology 3(4):488–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dykhuizen RF, Robert JA et al (1970) The ovarian vein syndrome. Surg Gynecol Obetet 130(3):443–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maubon A, Ferru JM, Thiebaut C, Berger V, Hoche N, Rouanet JP (1997) Left ovarian vein syndrome. J Radiol 78(3):223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tourné G, Ducroux A, Bourbon M, Blinding H (2002) J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 31(5):471–477

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dure-Smith P (1979) Ovarian syndrome: is it a myth? Urology 13(4):355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodgkinson CP (1951) Ovarian vein pressure studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 61(2):321–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Southwell TH, Bourne CW (1971) Experimental ovarian vein dilatation. J Urol 105(3):346–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marhall S, Lyon RP, Minkler D (1966) Ureteral dilatation following use of oral contraceptives. JAMA 198(7):782–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar D (1962) In vitro inhibitory effect of progesterone on extrauterine human smooth muscle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 84:1300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Kalaitzis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalaitzis, C., Zissimopoulos, A., Bantis, A. et al. Minimal invasive treatment options in pregnant women with ovarian vein syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 83–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1926-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1926-6

Keywords

Navigation