Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate risk factors and pregnancy outcome of patients with placenta previa.

Methods

A population-based study comparing all singleton pregnancies of women with and without placenta previa was conducted. Stratified analysis using multiple logistic regression models was performed to control for confounders.

Results

During the study period, there were 185,476 deliveries, of which, 0.42% were complicated with placenta previa. Using a multivariable analysis with backward elimination, the following risk factors were independently associated with placenta previa: infertility treatments (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.45–2.66; P < 0.001), prior cesarean delivery (CD; OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.48–2.09; P < 0.001) and advanced maternal age (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.07–1.09; P < 0.001). Placenta previa was significantly associated with adverse outcomes such as peripartum hysterectomy (5.3 vs. 0.04%; P < 0.001), previous episode of second trimester bleeding (3.9 vs. 0.05%; P < 0.001), blood transfusion (21.9 vs. 1.2%; P < 0.001), maternal sepsis (0.4 vs. 0.02%; P < 0.001), vasa previa (0.5 vs. 0.1%; P < 0.001), malpresentation (19.8 vs. 5.4%; P < 0.001), postpartum hemorrhage (1.4 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.001) and placenta accreta (3.0 vs. 1.3%; P < 0.001). Placenta previa was significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes such as higher rates of perinatal mortality (6.6 vs. 1.3%; P < 0.001), an Apgar score <7 after 1 and 5 min (25.3 vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001, and 7.1 vs. 2.6%, P < 0.001, respectively), congenital malformations (11.5 vs. 5.1%; P < 0.001) and intrauterine growth restriction (3.6 vs. 2.1%; P = 0.003). Using another multivariable logistic regression model, with perinatal mortality as the outcome variable, controlling for confounders, such as preterm birth, maternal age, etc., placenta previa was not found as an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality (weighted OR 1.018; 95% CI 0.74–1.40; P = 0.910).

Conclusions

Infertility treatments, prior cesarean section, and advanced maternal age are independent risk factors for placenta previa. An increase in the incidence of these risk factors probably contributes to a rise in the number of pregnancies complicated with placenta previa and its association with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Careful surveillance of these risk factors is recommended with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC (2006) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 107(4):927–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (1997) The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(5):1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crane JM, Van den Hof MC, Dodds L, Armson BA, Liston R (2000) Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 17(2):101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M, Mazor M (2001) Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med 10(6):414–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ananth CV, Demissie K, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2003) Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faiz AS, Ananth CV (2003) Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13(3):175–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koifman A, Levy A, Zaulan Y, Harlev A, Mazor M, Wiznitzer A et al (2008) The clinical significance of bleeding during the second trimester of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(1):47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2003) The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(5):1299–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salihu HM, Li Q, Rouse DJ, Alexander GR (2003) Placenta previa: neonatal death after live births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(5):1305–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M (2003) Identifying risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. A population-based study. J Reprod Med 48(8):622–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi SJ, Song SE, Jung KL, Oh SY, Kim JH, Roh CR (2008) Antepartum risk factors associated with peripartum cesarean hysterectomy in women with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 25(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF (2006) Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 30(5):235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M (2006) Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health 96(5):867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request, 2006, pp 1–29

  15. Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J (2009) Rising cesarean delivery rates: the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(2):115–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stjernholm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E (2010) Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(1):49–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montan S (2007) Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(2):110–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database

  19. Temmerman M, Verstraelen H, Martens G, Bekaert A (2004) Delayed childbearing and maternal mortality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 114(1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Salem Yaniv S, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holcberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E (2010) A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet

  21. Kolip P, Misselwitz B, Schmidt S (2008) Frequency of caesarean sections amongst single-foetus births following infertility treatment: an investigation by the Hessian Perinatal Registry (HEPE). Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 212(6):217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von During V, Skjaerven R, Vatten LJ (2006) Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 21(9):2353–2358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Sheiner.

Additional information

Performed in part of Tom Rosenberg MD requirements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, T., Pariente, G., Sergienko, R. et al. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 47–51 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1598-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1598-7

Keywords

Navigation