Skip to main content
Log in

Polycystic ovaries: review of medical information on the internet for patients

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Often, internet can bring a sense of anxiety rather than information and understanding to the patient. Our aim was to assess the quality of information available for patients on the management of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet.

Materials and methods

Five search engines were searched using phrases ‘PCOS and ‘patient information’. Various parameters of quality that were assessed were source, currency and editorial review process (for credibility) and hierarchy and accuracy of evidence (for content of the websites).

Results

Fifteen relevant websites were located, none of which complied with all the criteria for quality. Complete information on PCOS was not provided by any of the website to women according to the quality criteria.

Conclusions

With 1,000 of websites launched everyday, it is difficult for patients to determine which website is trustworthy and valid. Patients need to be watchful about quality of the information on medical conditions in the internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Escobar-Morreale HF (2000) A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2434–2438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R et al (2004) The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(6):2745–2749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broom A (2005) Virtually healthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor–patient relationship. Qual Health Res 15:325–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamanti-Kandarakis E (2008) Polycystic ovarian syndrome: pathophysiology, molecular aspects and clinical implications. Expert Rev Mol Med 10:e3 (review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Donabedian A (1980) Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, vol 1. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor

  6. Eng TR (2001) eHealth landscape—a terrain map of emerging information and communication technologies in health and health care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton. http://www.rwjf.org/app/rw_publications_and_links/publicationsPdfs/eHealth.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  7. ESHRE/ASRM–Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group E (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER (2002) Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the worldwide web: a systematic review. JAMA 287(20):2691–2700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson T, Frydman G (2004) The first generation of e-patients. Br Med J 328:1148–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank A (1995) The wounded storyteller: body, illness and ethics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  11. IMO warns against online self diagnosis, Irish Times, 9 September 2008

  12. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 176 (1994) ISO 8402: quality management and quality assurance vocabulary, 2nd edn. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1994(1994-04-01)

  13. Kitzinger C, Willmott J (2002) ‘The thief of womanhood’: women’s experience of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Soc Sci Med 54:349–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knochenhauer ES, Key TJ, Kahsar-Miller M et al (1998) Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83(9):3078–3082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sproule JA, Tansey C, Burns B, Fenelon G (2003) The web: friend or foe of the hand surgeon? Hand Surg 8(2):181–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1989) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan D (2006) Nielsen net ratings search engine ratings search engine watch, 22 Aug 2006. http://wwwsearchenginewatch.com/2156451

  19. Weisbord SD, Soule JB, Kimmel PL (1997) Brief report: poison on line—acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the internet. N Engl J Med 337(12):825–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wyatt JC (1997) Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the worldwide web. Br Med J 314:1879–1881

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Channamallikarjuna Swamy Mallappa Saroja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mallappa Saroja, C.S., Hanji Chandrashekar, S. Polycystic ovaries: review of medical information on the internet for patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281, 839–843 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1378-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1378-4

Keywords

Navigation