Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital: a case-control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to review all obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the Royal Free Hospital, London, UK, and to identify the risk factors for obstetric admissions to the ICU.

Method

We carried out a retrospective case-control study. The cases consisted of women admitted to the ICU during pregnancy and up to 42 days postpartum between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2003. Controls were women who delivered immediately before and after the indexed case. Demographic data, medical and surgical histories, pregnancy, and intrapartum and postpartum data were collected. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.

Results

Thirty-three obstetric patients were admitted to the ICU, representing 0.11% of all deliveries. The ICU utilization rate was 0.81%. Eighty percent of the admissions were postpartum. The main indications for admission were hypertensive disorders (39.4%), and obstetric haemorrhage (36.4%). There was no difference between cases and controls in, age, parity, smoking and employment status. Compared with controls, women admitted to the ICU were significantly more likely to be black (P<0.05), have a shorter mean duration of pregnancy (36.6 vs. 39.2 weeks; P=0.006), delivered by emergency caesarean section (P<0.001), and have higher mean blood loss at delivery (1,173 vs. 296 ml; P<0.001). The risk factors for obstetric ICU admission were black race (odds ratio [OR] =2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–6.28), emergency caesarean section (OR=14.9, 95% CI 5.38–41.45) and primary postpartum haemorrhage (OR=5.4, 95% CI 1.79–4.35).

Conclusion

Women of black race, those delivered by emergency caesarean section and those with primary postpartum haemorrhage are more likely to be admitted to the ICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben Letaifa D, Daouas N, Ben Jazia K, Slama A, Jegham H (2002) Maternal emergencies requiring controlled ventilation: epidemiology and prognosis. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 31:256–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouvier-Colle MH, Varnoux N, Salanave B, Ancel PY, Breart G (1997) Case-control study of risk factors for obstetric patients’ admission to intensive care units. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 74:173–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J, Singer P, Kogan A, Hod M, Bar J (2000) Course and outcome of obstetric patients in a general intensive care unit. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 79:846–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Drife JO (1993) Maternal “near miss” reports? BMJ 307:1087–1088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzpatrick C, Halligan A, McKenna P, Coughlan BM, Darling MRM, Phelan D (1992) Near miss maternal mortality [letter]. Ir Med J 85:37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert TT, Smulian JC, Martin AA, Ananth CV, Scorza W, Scardella AT (2003) Critical care obstetric team. Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: outcomes and severity of illness. Obstet Gynaecol 102:897–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gwyneth L (ed) (2001) Why mothers die. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1997–1999. RCOG, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hazelgrove JF, Price C, Pappachan VJ, Smith GB (2001) Multicenter study of obstetric admissions to 14 intensive care units in southern England. Crit Care Med 29:770–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loverro G, Pansini V, Greco P, Vimercati A, Parisi AM, Selvaggi L (2001) Indications and outcome for intensive care unit admission during puerperium. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahutte NG, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Le Q Solomon J, Benjamin A, Boyd ME (1999) Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit. Obstet Gynecol 94:263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Panchal S, Arria AM, Harris AP (2000) Intensive care utilisation during hospital admission for delivery: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in a statewide population. Anaesthesiology 92:1537–1544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Platteau P, Engelhardt T, Moodley J, Muckart DJ (1997) Obstetric and gynaecological patients in an intensive care unit: 1 year review. Trop Doct 27:202–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stones W, Lim W, Al-Azzawi F, Kelly M (1991) An investigation of maternal morbidity with identification of life-threatening ‘near miss’ episodes. Health Trends 23:13–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang LC, Kwok AC, Womg AY, Lee YY, Sun KO, So AP (1997) Critical care in obstetrical patients: an eight year review. Chin Med J (Engl) 110:936–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity case-control study. BMJ 322:1089–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Gwyn Jones for his statistical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel O Selo-Ojeme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selo-Ojeme, D.O., Omosaiye, M., Battacharjee, P. et al. Risk factors for obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272, 207–210 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0695-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0695-x

Keywords

Navigation