Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compliance status and influencing factors of anticoagulation therapy in outpatient undergoing major orthopedic surgery

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate influencing factors of out-of-hospital anticoagulation therapy compliance among patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries.

Methods

A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted from July 2022 to February 2023 among outpatients who underwent major orthopedic surgery in our hospital. Patients (n = 200) were surveyed using the General Information Questionnaire, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Specificity of Medication-Taking Beliefs Scale, and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Factors that influenced patient compliance were also determined using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results

One hundred eighty-three valid questionnaires were returned, the compliance with outpatient anticoagulation therapy among patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries was good in 56.3% (103/183) of all cases and poor in 43.7% (80/183). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that medication duration, adverse effects, self-efficacy and medication beliefs influenced adherence to out-of-hospital anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Poor compliance with out-of-hospital anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery is mainly associated with a long course of medication, adverse reactions, low self-efficacy and low medication beliefs. Healthcare staff should strengthen post-discharge anticoagulation management based on relevant influencing factors to enhance patient compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Tian W (2016) Guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopaedic surgery in China. Chin J Orthop 36(02):65–71. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253⁃2352.2016.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Astous J, Liederman Z, Douketis JD (2021) Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk orthopedic and cancer surgery. Postgrad Med 133(suppl 1):20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2021.1891751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson CD, Cifu AS, Burroughs-Ray DC (2022) Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism. JAMA 327(21):2141–2142. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.7325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ebell MH (2022) Updated American College of Chest Physicians Guideline on antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism. Am Fam Physician 106(2):204B (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shahi A, Chen AF, Tan TL et al (2017) The incidence and economic burden of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in the United States. J Arthroplasty 32(4):1063–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber M, Chao M, Kaur S et al (2022) A look forward and a look back: the growing role of ERAS protocols in orthopedic surgery. Clin Sports Med 41(2):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2021.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno JP, Bautista M, Castro J et al (2020) Extended thromboprophylaxis for hip or knee arthroplasty. Does the administration route and dosage regimen affect adherence? A cohort study. Int Orthop 44(2):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04454-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Viana L, Nogueira I, Fontenele A et al (2021) Thromboembolism in arthroplasty: compliance to prophylaxis. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 56(5):647–655. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tong K, Liu H, Qin J et al (2021) Current status survey of the extramural hospital management of venous thromboembolism after total hip and knee arthroplasty in China. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):787. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04663-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert H, John W, Maittew H (1999) The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449908407311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M et al (2008) Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 10(5):348–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Yu G (2018) Investigation of oral anticoagulant adherence and management strategies in hip and knee replacement patients after discharge from hospital. Contemp Nurse 25(02):93–95

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergqvist D, Arcelus JI, Felicissimo P (2012) Post-discharge compliance to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk orthopaedic surgery: results from the ETHOS registry. Thromb Haemost 107(2):280–287. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH11-07-0464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giuliano KK, Pozzar R, Hatch C (2019) Thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for joint replacement surgery. J Healthc Qual 41(6):384–391. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Alameri MA, Syed SS, Ashour AM et al (2020) Venous thromboembolism prevention protocol for adapting prophylaxis recommendations to the potential risk post total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Pharm Pract (Granada) 18(3):2025. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.3.2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu Y, Zhao J, Chen Y (2018) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in China: a qualitative study of patients’ perceptions. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0813-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu L, Zhang X, Yang J (2021) Analysis of influencing factors of compliance with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and correlation with the severity of ischemic stroke. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2021:1021127. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1021127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang J, Ding S, Xiong S et al (2021) Medication adherence and associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural equation model. Front Public Health 9:730845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.730845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mi T, Li X, Zhou G et al (2020) HIV disclosure to family members and medication adherence: role of social support and self-efficacy. AIDS Behav 24(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02456-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Zhu X, Yan J et al (2021) Association between regulatory emotional self-efficacy and immunosuppressive medication adherence in renal transplant recipients: does medication belief act as a mediator? Front Pharmacol 12:559368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.559368

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Q, Jin Y, Wang Y et al (2023) Association between self-efficacy and self-management behaviours among individuals at high risk for stroke: social support acting as a mediator. J Clin Nurs 32(1–2):71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen YY, Weng LC, Li YT et al (2022) Mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between social support and self-management behaviors among patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 22(1):635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03331-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Murphy VE, Robijn AL, Metcalfe TB et al (2022) Beliefs about medicines and adherence to asthma medications during pregnancy. J Asthma. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2155185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van de Brug A, de Winter MA, Ten WM et al (2022) Deciding on treatment duration for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: what is important to patients? Thromb Haemost 122(4):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1535-8726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hijazi M, Aljohani S, Alqahtani F et al (2019) Perception of the risk of stroke and the risks and benefits of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study. Mayo Clin Proc 94(6):1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Atinga RA, Yarney L, Gavu NM (2018) Factors influencing long-term medication non-adherence among diabetes and hypertensive patients in Ghana: a qualitative investigation. PLoS ONE 13(3):e193995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonzalez-Bueno J, Sevilla-Sanchez D, Puigoriol-Juvanteny E et al (2022) Improving medication adherence and effective prescribing through a patient-centered prescription model in patients with multimorbidity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 78(1):127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03207-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the patients who participated in this study and the administrators in the hospitals who made the study possible.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by WH and MY. WH wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mao Ye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University approved this study (No. 2023135).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants before participation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, W., Ye, M. Compliance status and influencing factors of anticoagulation therapy in outpatient undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 583–589 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05106-3

Keywords

Navigation