Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Exeter short stem (ESS) is 25 mm shorter than the standard length v40 Exeter stem (Stryker) and intended for a narrow femoral diaphysis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the migration pattern of the cemented ESS.

Material and method

In a prospective single-center cohort study, 23 patients (21 female) mean age 78 (range 70–89) with hip osteoarthritis and Dorr Type A femurs were included. Preoperative DXA was used to group patients into normal (> − 1) and low (< − 1) T-score. Components were the collarless polished double-tapered Exeter short stem type N°1 L125. Patients were followed for 2 years with model-based RSA (stem migration), regular hip radiographs (stem position and cementation quality), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and VAS pain.

Results

At 2-year follow-up, the stems subsided 1.48 mm (CI 95% 1.69; 1.26) and retroverted 0.45° (CI 95% 0.01; 0.88). From 12 to 24 months, stem subsidence was 0.18 mm (CI 95% 0.1; 0.25) (p = 0.001) and retroversion was − 0.04° (CI 95% − 0.27; 0.18) (p = 0.70). T-score and stem subsidence correlated (rho = 0.48; p = 0.025) and patients with normal T-score (n = 7) had 0.42 mm (CI 95% − 0.01; 0.85) less subsidence as compared to patients with low T-score (n = 15) (p = 0.054). Stems in varus position (n = 9) subsided 1.7 mm (CI 95% 1.35; 2.05) compared to 1.33 mm (CI 95% 1.05; 1.60) for stems in neutral position (n = 13) (p = 0.07). Postoperative cementation quality did not influence 2-year stem migration. OHS improved to 40.7 (CI 95% 36.8; 44.7) and VAS pain at rest and activity decreased to 5 mm and 10 mm, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The 2-year migration pattern of the cemented ESS was similar to reports for the cemented standard length Exeter stem. Low preoperative T-score and varus stem-position showed a tendency for higher stem migration and should be studied as risk factors for failure in larger studies of cemented polished stems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyatt MC, Poutawera V, Kieser DC, Frampton CMA, Hooper GJ (2020) How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand national joint registry. Arthroplast Today 6(1):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.01.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14(3):231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choy GG, Roe JA, Whitehouse SL, Cashman KS, Crawford RW (2013) Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. J Arthroplasty 28(1):103-109.e101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelissen RG, Pijls BG, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER (2011) RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 3):62–65. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huiskes R (1993) Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 64(6):699–716. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308994602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(6):912–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malchau H, Kärrholm J, Wang YX, Herberts P (1995) Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66(5):418–424. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679508995578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaulé PE, Krismer M, Mayrhofer P, Wanner S, Le Duff M, Mattesich M, Stoeckl B, Amstutz HC, Biedermann R (2005) EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(5):741–744. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b5.15377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biedermann R, Krismer M, Stöckl B, Mayrhofer P, Ornstein E, Franzén H (1999) Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(2):266–272. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b2.8842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 76(4):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Stoel BC, Rozing PM, Reiber JH (2005) A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem. J Biomech 38(11):2330–2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplasty 17(4):463–466. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(3):385–389. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.74b3.1587883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 44(12):614–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi A, Donnelly WJ, Scott G, Freeman MA (1997) Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.79b4.7210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B (1998) Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810000-00011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83(2):129–134. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.672093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McCalden RW, Charron KD, Yuan X, Bourne RB, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ (2010) Randomised controlled trial comparing early migration of two collarless polished cemented stems using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(7):935–940. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.24462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfaro-Adrián J, Gill HS, Murray DW (1999) Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(1):130–134. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefansdottir A, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Sundberg M (2004) Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem; a radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 75(4):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001169-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Vries LM, van der Weegen W, Pilot P, Stolarczyk PA, Sijbesma T, Hoffman EL (2014) The predictive value of radiostereometric analysis for stem survival in total hip arthroplasty. A systematic review. Hip Int 24(3):215–222. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, Beard DJ, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2005) Influence of stem geometry on the stability of polished tapered cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(7):921–927. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b7.16079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundberg M, Besjakov J, von Schewelow T, Carlsson A (2005) Movement patterns of the C-stem femoral component: an RSA study of 33 primary total hip arthroplasties followed for two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(10):1352–1356. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b10.16567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hauptfleisch J, Glyn-Jones S, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW (2006) The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confirmation of RSA predictions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.17055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray DW, Gulati A, Gill HS (2013) Ten-year RSA-measured migration of the Exeter femoral stem. Bone Joint J 95-b(5):605–608. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b5.31330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aro HT, Alm JJ, Moritz N, Mäkinen TJ, Lankinen P (2012) Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total hip arthroplasty in women: a 2-year RSA study of 39 patients. Acta Orthop 83(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.678798

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, Llinas A, Gogan W (1994) The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199401000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Devitt A, O’Sullivan T, Quinlan W (1997) 16- to 25-year follow-up study of cemented arthroplasty of the hip in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 12(5):479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90169-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olsson SS, Jernberger A, Tryggö D (1981) Clinical and radiological long-term results after Charnley-Müller total hip replacement. A 5 to 10 year follow-up study with special reference to aseptic loosening. Acta Orthop Scand 52(5):531–542. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108992143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson LJ, Roe JA, Pearcy MJ, Crawford RW (2012) Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length. J Arthroplasty 27(6):934–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paulsen A, Odgaard A, Overgaard S (2012) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires. Bone Joint Res 1(9):225–233. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Stryker Inc supported the study financially but had no influence on the data interpretation, manuscript or publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DV, KS and MS designed the study. SSJ operated the patients and collected the data. TDV and PBJ performed the image analyses and statistical analyses. TDV, PBJ and MS wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to data interpretation and manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Dahl Vind.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-545-13) and the Central Denmark Regions Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics (1-10-72-346-13) and was performed in agreement with the Helsinki II declaration.

Consent to participate

All patients consented in writing after receiving oral and written project information.

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed and confirmed the accuracy of the whole manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vind, T.D., Jørgensen, P.B., Vainorius, D. et al. Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 1071–1080 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04307-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04307-y

Keywords

Navigation