Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hallux anatomy: much ado about shoes—an attempt to prove that constrictive V-shaped toe-box shoes deform the hallux

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A question still remains as to whether constrictive toe-box shoes (TBS) cause disability only due to pain on pressure points or if they can cause permanent changes in the hallux anatomy. The aim of this study is to compare the hallux morphology in 3 groups classified according to their use of constrictive or open TBS.

Methods

424 patients were classified into 3 groups: group A used open TBS daily; group B used constrictive TBS daily; group C used both open and constrictive TBS. Hallux’s angles, presence of exostoses and shape of the distal phalanx (DP) were analyzed on dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs and compared amongst groups.

Results

The intermetatarsal (IMA), metatarsophalangeal (MTPA), DASA, PASA, interphalangeal (IPA), obliquity (AP1), asymmetry (AP2) and joint deviation (JDA) angles for group A were 10°, 8°, 5°, 4°, 9°, 3°, 5°, 3°; for group B were 9°, 19°, 5°, 6°, 12°, 2°, 8°, 2°; and for group C were 10°, 10°, 4°, 4°, 12°, 3°, 8°, 1°. Only the differences in the MTPA, IPA and AP2 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The prevalence of exostoses on the tibial side of the DP was 22, 36, and 29% in groups A, B and C, respectively (p < 0.05). We found similar distributions of the different DP shapes in the three groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the use of constrictive TBS, even if used only occasionally, could change hallux anatomy from a young age increasing MTPA, IPA and AP2. Moreover, we have found that DP exostoses are present as a “normal variation” in patients who wear an open TBS, but their prevalence is higher in those wearing constrictive toe-box shoes. This could be due to a reactive bone formation secondary to the friction caused by the inner border of the shoe.

Level of clinical evidence

3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viladot A, Viladot R (2011) Hallux valgus. In: 20 lecciones sobre patología del pie. Mayo, Barcelona

  2. Villas C, Del Rio J, Valenti A, Alfonso M (2009) Symptomatic medial exostosis of the great toe distal phalanx: a complication due to over-correction following akin osteotomy for hallux valgus repair. J Foot Ankle Surg 48:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Montiel V, Alfonso M, Villas C, Valentí A (2019) Medial and lateral exostoses of the distal phalanx of the hallux: a potentially painful bunion-like structure. Part 1: incidence and clinical application. Foot Ankle Surg 25:158–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston O (1956) Further studies of the inheritance of hand and foot anomalies. ClinOrthop 8:146–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CH, Lee S, Kang H et al (2014) Genetic influences on hallux valgus in Koreans: the healthy twin study. Twin Res Hum Genet 17:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muñoz-Mahamud E, Méndez A, Poggio Cano D, Asunción Márquez J (2012) Estudioclínico y radiológico del hallux valgus interfalángico. Rev del Pie y Tobillo 26:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Munteanu S, Menz H, Wark J et al (2017) Hallux valgus, by nature or nurture? A twin study. Arthritis Care Res 69:1421–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett C (1962) Valgus deviation of the distal phalanx of the great toe. J Anat 96:171–177

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnett C (1962) The normal orientation of the human hallux and the effect of footwear. J Anat 96:489–494

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Branthwaite H, Chockalingam N, Greenhalgh A (2013) The effect of shoe toe box shape and volume on forefoot interdigital and plantar pressures in healthy females. J Foot Ankle Res 6:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlin M (1995) Women’s shoe wear and foot disorders. West J Med 163:569–570

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Guidozzi F (2017) Foot problems in older women. Climacteric 20:518–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haines R, McDougall A (1954) Shoe design and toe deformation. Lancet 267:1308–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shine I (1965) Incidence of hallux valgus in a partially shoe-wearing community. Br Med J 1:1648–1650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sim-Fook L, Hodgson A (1958) A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone JtSurg 40:1058–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi JY, Woo SH, Oh SH, Suh JSA (2015) A comparative study of the feet of middle-aged women in Korea and the Maasai tribe. J Foot Ankle Res 8:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Castro-Aragon O, Vallurupalli S, Warner M et al (2009) Ethnic radiographic foot differences. Foot Ankle Int 30:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson A, Zipfel B (2005) The unshod child into womanhood—forefoot morphology in two populations. Foot 15:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi JY, Babu H, Joseph FN et al (2018) Effects of wearing shoes on the feet: radiographic comparison of middle-aged partially shod Maasai women’s feet and regularly shod Maasai and Korean women’s feet. Foot Ankle Surg 24:330–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frey C, Thompson F, Smith J et al (1993) American orthopaedic foot and ankle society women’s shoe survey. Foot Ankle 14:78–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Menz H, Roddy E, Marshall M et al (2016) Epidemiology of shoe wearing patterns over time in older women: associations with foot pain and hallux valgus. J GerontolSer A Biol Sci Med Sci 71:1682–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee M, Hodler J, Haghighi P, Resnick D (1992) Bone excrescence at the medial base of the distal phalanx of the first toe: normal variant, reactive change, or neoplasia? SkeletRadiol 21:161–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Winter W, Iwersen L, Johnson E (1989) Lateral supporting ligament of the distal phalanx. Foot Ankle 9:310–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sorto L, Balding M, Weil L, Smith S (1976) Hallux abductus interphalangeus: etiology, X-ray evaluation and treatment. J Am PodiatrAssoc 66:384–396

    Google Scholar 

  25. Viladot A (1982) The metatarsals. In: Jahss MH (ed) Disorders of the foot, vol I. Saunders, Montreal, pp 659–710

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffmann P (1905) The feet of barefooted and shoe-wearing peoples. J Bone JtSurg 2:105–136

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klein C, Groll-Knapp E, Kundi M (2009) Increased hallux angle in children and its association with insufficient length of footwear: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC MusculoskeletDisord 10:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim P, Shields N, Nikolopoulos N et al (2015) The association of foot structure and footwear fit with disability in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. J Foot Ankle Res 8:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Emslie M (1939) The prevention of foot deformities in children. Lancet 2:1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hardy R, Clapham J (1952) Hallux valgus predisposing anatomical causes. Lancet 259:1180–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Keats T, Anderson M (2012) In: Atlas of normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease, 9th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verónica Montiel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical review committee statement

This paper did not require institutional review board approval. All the data has been anonymized and cannot be traced back to the patients and no invasive procedure additional to our regular practice was performed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montiel, V., Valentí, A., Villas, C. et al. Hallux anatomy: much ado about shoes—an attempt to prove that constrictive V-shaped toe-box shoes deform the hallux. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 1793–1800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03792-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03792-5

Keywords

Navigation