Abstract
Background
Long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) instability is an important source of pain and disability for the shoulder. Supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons contribute to the formation of the biceps pulley system, which maintains biceps stability during shoulder movements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of morphology of bicipital groove on the stability of LHBT. Also, to evaluate the relationship between bicipital groove morphology and subscapularis rupture and supraspinatus rupture.
Material and methods
Surgical images and magnetic resonance images of 200 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy surgery in our clinic between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The depth of groove, medial wall angle and opening angle values of 200 patients were measured on MRI. The stability of the biceps long head tendon, rotator cuff tear and SLAP lesions was recorded by monitoring the shoulder arthroscopy records in each groups.
Results
There were 200 patients, 131 male and 69 female, with an average age of 40.9 ± 14.2 (range: 17.0–79.0) years. In 69 (34.5%) patients, long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) instability was detected. The patients were divided into two groups according to LHBT instability.The subscapularis rupture was significantly more frequent in the group with LHBT instability (52.2%) than the group without LHBT instability (4.6%) (p < 0.001). The supraspinatus tear was observed in 72.5% in the group with instability and 56.5% in the non-instability group, which shows a statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.027). The presence of SLAP was observed in similar rates in both groups (p = 0.053). Mean depth of groove, medial wall angle, and opening angle measurements were similar in both groups (p = 0.568, p = 0.393 and p = 0.598, respectively).
Conclusion
To conclude, the morphology of the bicipital groove is not related to the stability of LHBT, and the soft tissue factors above the bicipital groove rather than bone morphology are important in stability. In addition, subscapularis rupture is a pre-disposing factor for LHBT instability; therefore, we recommend a more careful examination of LHBT in patients with subscapularis rupture.
Level of evidence
III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abboud JA et al (2010) Bicipital groove morphology on MRI has no correlation to intra-articular biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(6):790–794
Ahovuo J (1985) Radiographic anatomy of the intertubercular groove of the humerus. Eur I Radio 1(5):83–86
Ataoglu MB, Cetinkaya M, Ozer M, Ayanoglu T, Kanatli U (2018) The high frequency of superior labrum, biceps tendon, and superior rotator cuff pathologies in patients with subscapularis tears: a cohort study. J Orthop Sci 23(2):304–309
Barber FA, Field LD, Ryu RK (2007) Biceps tendon and superior labrum injuries: decision-making. JBJS 89(8):1844–1855
Chen CH, Hsu KY, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2005) Incidence and severity of biceps long head tendon lesion in patients with complete rotator cuff tears. J Trauma 58(6):1189–1193
Hawi N, Liodakis E, Garving C, Habermeyer P, Tauber M (2017) Pulley lesions in rotator cuff tears: prevalence, etiology, and concomitant pathologies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(8):1097–1105
Hitchcock HH, Bechtol CO (1948) Painful shoulder: observations on the role of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii in its causation. JBJS 30(2):263–273
Hufeland M, Wicke S, Verde PE, Krauspe R, Patzer T (2019) Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(7):961–970
Jeong JJ, Park SE, Ji JH, Lee HH, Jung SH, Choi BS (2020) Trans-tendon suture bridge rotator cuff repair with tenotomized pathologic biceps tendon augmentation in high-grade PASTA lesions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(1):67–76
Lafosse L et al (2007) Anterior and posterior instability of the long head of the biceps tendon in rotator cuff tears: a new classification based on arthroscopic observations. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 23(1):73–80
Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA et al (2010) Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:645–656
Pfahler M, Branner S, Refior H (1999) The role of the bicipital groove in tendopathy of the long biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(5):419–424
Shi LL, Mullen MG, Freehill MT, Lin A, Warner JJ, Higgins LD (2015) Accuracy of long head of the biceps subluxation as a predictor for subscapularis tears. Arthroscopy 31(4):615–619
Slätis P, Aalto K (1979) Medial dislocation of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Acta Orthop Scand 50(1):73–77
Smith AL (2007) Morphologic classification of the bicipital groove. Paper presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Diego
Spritzer CE, Collins AJ, Cooperman A et al (2001) Assessment of instability of the long head of the biceps tendon by MRI. Skeletal Radiol 30:199–207
Walch G et al (1998) Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(2):100–108
Yoo JC et al (2017) The influence of bicipital groove morphology on the stability of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Orthop Surg 25(2):2309499017717195
Funding
There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The review board approval was provided for this retrospective study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulucakoy, C., Kaptan, A.Y., Yapar, A. et al. The effect of bicipital groove morphology on the stability of the biceps long head tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 1325–1330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03760-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03760-z