Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence and risk factors of mild cognitive impairment in a tertiary care setting in Turkey

Prävalenz und Risikofaktoren einer leichten kognitiven Beeinträchtigung in einer tertiären Einrichtung in der Türkei

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate stage between healthy cognition and dementia, particularly Alzheimer’s disease. There is limited information on the prevalence of MCI among older Turkish adults. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of MCI in Turkey.

Material and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with community-dwelling older people who were admitted to a tertiary geriatric outpatient clinic. Information on demographics and clinical variables was obtained. We used a neuropsychological battery to assess the cognitive domains in each subject. Participants who fell below 1.5 standard deviations on 1 or more of the 5 cognitive tests were considered MCI and were classified as either single domain MCI and multiple domain MCI. Risk factors were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 259 participants were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 74.0 years (SD 7.1 years), 54% were women, and 48.3% had a low level of education (≤ 5 years). The overall prevalence of MCI was 52.1%, with 27.8% for single domain MCI and 24.3% for multiple domain MCI. The prevalence of MCI increased with age: 16.4% aged 65–74 years, 32.0% aged 75–84 years, and 40.9% ≥ 85 years. Advanced age and low educational level were risk factors for both single domain MCI (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02–1.13; p = 0.003 and OR = 3.18; 95% CI:1.7–6.1; p < 0.001) and multiple domain MCI (OR = 1.1; 95% CI:1.1–1.2; p < 0.001 and adjusted OR = 11.9; 95% CI:5.1–27.8; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

MCI was common in older Turkish people admitted to a tertiary hospital, especially in those with advanced age and low educational level.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Leichte kognitive Beeinträchtigung (MCI) ist ein Zwischenstadium zwischen gesunder Kognition und Demenz, insbesondere der Alzheimer-Krankheit. Es gibt nur begrenzte Informationen zur Prävalenz von MCI bei älteren türkischen Erwachsenen. Diese Studie zielte darauf ab, die Prävalenz und Risikofaktoren von MCI in der Türkei zu bestimmen.

Material und Methoden

Es wurde eine Querschnittstudie mit ambulant lebenden älteren Menschen durchgeführt, die in eine tertiäre geriatrische Ambulanz aufgenommen wurden. Es wurden Informationen zu demografischen und klinischen Variablen eingeholt. Wir verwendeten eine neuropsychologische Batterie, um die kognitiven Domänen in jedem Fach zu bewerten. Teilnehmer, die bei einem oder mehreren der fünf kognitiven Tests unter 1,5 Standardabweichungen fielen, galten als MCI und wurden als Single-Domain-MCI und Multi-Domain-MCI klassifiziert. Risikofaktoren wurden mittels univariater und multivariater logistischer Regressionsanalyse bestimmt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 259 Teilnehmer in diese Studie aufgenommen. Das mittlere Alter betrug 74,0 Jahre (Standardabweichung [SD]: 7,1), 54 % waren Frauen und 48,3 % hatten einen niedrigen Bildungsstand (≤ 5 Jahre). Die Gesamtprävalenz von MCI betrug 52,1 %, davon 27,8 % für MCI mit einer einzelnen Domäne und 24,3 % für MCI mit mehreren Domänen. Die Prävalenz von MCI nahm mit dem Alter zu: 16,4 % im Alter von 65–74 Jahren, 32,0 % im Alter von 75–84 Jahren und 40,9 % im Alter von ≥ 85 Jahren. Höheres Alter und niedriges Bildungsniveau waren Risikofaktoren sowohl für MCI in einer Domäne (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1,07; 95 % Konfidenzintervall [KI] 1,02–1,13; p = 0,003 und OR = 3,18; 95 % KI 1,7–6,1; p < 0,001) als auch für MCI in mehreren Domänen (OR = 1,1; 95 % KI: 1,1–1,2; p < 0,001 und angepasstes OR = 11,9; 95 % KI 5,1–27,8; p < 0,001).

Diskussion

MCI ist bei türkischen älteren Menschen in einem Krankenhaus der Tertiärstufe üblich, insbesondere bei Personen mit fortgeschrittenem Alter und niedrigem Bildungsniveau.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prince MJ et al (2015) World Alzheimer report 2015—the global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen RC (2016) Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 22(2 Dementia):404–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunne RA et al (2021) Mild cognitive impairment: the Manchester consensus. Age Ageing 50(1):72–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lonie JA et al (2009) Screening for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 24(9):902–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganguli M et al (2005) Alzheimer disease and mortality: a 15-year epidemiological study. Arch Neurol 62(5):779–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia L et al (2020) Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health 5(12):e661–e671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachdev PS et al (2015) The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in diverse geographical and ethnocultural regions: the COSMIC collaboration. Plos One 10(11):e142388

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Trittschuh EH et al (2011) Effects of varying diagnostic criteria on prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in a community based sample. J Alzheimers Dis 25(1):163–173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. TUIK (2022) Elderly with statistics

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doruk H et al (2010) The relationship between body mass index and incidental mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and Vascular Dementia in elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 14(10):834–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiral K et al (2013) Detection of memory impairment in a community-based system: a collaborative study. Health Soc Work 38(2):89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McLeod S (2019) Z‑score: definition, calculation and interpretation. Simply Psychol 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brodaty H et al (2013) Mild cognitive impairment in a community sample: the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Alzheimers Dement 9(3):310–317e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson K et al (2019) Using varying diagnostic criteria to examine mild cognitive impairment prevalence and predict dementia incidence in a community-based sample. J Alzheimers Dis 68(4):1439–1451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caffo AO et al (2022) The prevalence of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment and its association with different lifestyle factors in a south Italian elderly population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(5):3097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Luck T et al (2010) Incidence of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 29(2):164–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manly JJ et al (2008) Frequency and course of mild cognitive impairment in a multiethnic community. Ann Neurol 63(4):494–506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Unverzagt FW et al (2001) Prevalence of cognitive impairment: data from the Indianapolis Study of Health and Aging. Neurology 57(9):1655–1662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Busse A et al (2003) Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and incidence according to different diagnostic criteria. Results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+). Br J Psychiatry 182:449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander M et al (2015) Age-stratified prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in European populations: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 48(2):355–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tervo S et al (2004) Incidence and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment: a population-based three-year follow-up study of cognitively healthy elderly subjects. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 17(3):196–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Solfrizzi V et al (2004) Vascular risk factors, incidence of MCI, and rates of progression to dementia. Neurology 63(10):1882–1891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Degen C et al (2022) Differences in cognitive functioning in two birth cohorts born 20 years apart: data from the interdisciplinary longitudinal study of ageing. Brain Sci 12(2):271

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kivipelto M et al (2018) Lifestyle interventions to prevent cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 14(11):653–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Casaletto KB et al (2020) Late-life physical and cognitive activities independently contribute to brain and cognitive resilience. J Alzheimers Dis 74(1):363–376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Horder H et al (2018) Midlife cardiovascular fitness and dementia: A 44-year longitudinal population study in women. Neurology 90(15):e1298–e1305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Erickson KI et al (2011) Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(7):3017–3022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapman SB et al (2015) Neural mechanisms of brain plasticity with complex cognitive training in healthy seniors. Cereb Cortex 25(2):396–405

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Betül Gülsüm Yavuz Veizi: gathered data, wrote part of the manuscript and revised other parts. Candeniz Avcı: gathered data, performed the statistical analysis, wrote part of the manuscript. Hatice Tuğba Yazır: contributed patients, gathered data and wrote part of the manuscript. Mehmet Ilkin Naharcı: conceived the idea, supervised the study and reviewed the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Betül Gülsüm Yavuz Veizi MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B.G. Yavuz Veizi, C. Avci, H.T. Yazir and M.I. Naharci declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study design was approved by our local ethics committee. All patients included in the study gave their written and verbal consent to participate in the study.

Additional information

figure qr

Scan QR code & read article online

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yavuz Veizi, B.G., Avci, C., Yazir, H.T. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mild cognitive impairment in a tertiary care setting in Turkey. Z Gerontol Geriat 57, 113–119 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-023-02181-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-023-02181-4

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation