Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of prognostic factors in different grades of histologic differentiation in colorectal cancer patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and establishment of prognostic nomograms for moderately differentiated grade

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with different grades of histologic differentiation of colorectal cancer (CRC) who received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to establish a nomogram for predicting postoperative survival based on moderately differentiated CRC.

Methods

We analyzed CRC patients from the SEER database who received NAC before operation between 2010 and 2015. The Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to describe the differences in CSS and OS of CRC patients with different histologic grades of differentiation. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic factors. Nomograms were established to predict CSS and OS at 3 and 5 years by integrating independent prognostic factors. The calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and C-index were used to verify nomograms.

Results

A total of 6481 patients with CRC who received preoperative NAC were included in this study. Patients with different grades of histologic differentiation had significant differences in CSS and OS (P < 0.001), and the independent prognostic factors of different grades of histologic differentiation showed heterogeneity. In patients with moderately differentiated grade CRC, the independent prognostic factors for CSS and OS were age, race, marital status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level before treatment, site of primary tumor, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage, liver metastasis, and lung metastasis. Nomograms were established based on the independent prognostic factors of moderately differentiated grade CRC, and its calibration curves, area under the curve (AUC), and C-index showed good prediction accuracy.

Conclusions

The independent prognostic factors of CSS and OS are different in patients with different grades of histologic differentiation of CRC who received NAC before the operation. Nomograms can be used to predict the survival of patients with moderately differentiated grade CRC who received preoperative NAC and to assist clinicians in making clinical decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (https://seer.cancer.gov/).

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Sauer AG et al (2020) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deidda S, Elmore U, Rosati R et al (2021) Association of delayed surgery with oncologic long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not responding to preoperative chemoradiation. JAMA Surg 156:1141–1149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson AB, Venook AP, Cederquist L et al (2017) Colon cancer, version 1.2017 clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:370–398

  5. Benson A, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM et al (2018) Rectal cancer, version 2.2018 clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:874–901

  6. Shivji S, Conner JR, Barresi V, Kirsch R (2020) Poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal cancer: a current review and implications for future practice. Histopathol 77:351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang J, Jin W, Lin Z, Li S (2023) New personal model for forecasting the outcome of patients with histological grade III-IV colorectal cancer based on regional lymph nodes. J Oncol 2023:6980548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jurescu A, Dema A, Vaduva A et al (2022) Poorly differentiated clusters and tumor budding are important prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 22:164–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Komori K, Kanemitsu Y, Ishiguro S et al (2011) Clinicopathological study of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas: comparison between solid-type and non-solid-type adenocarcinomas. Anticancer Res 31:3463–3467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Q, Bao J, Zhang Y et al (2023) Predictive value of CT-based extracellular volume fraction in the preoperative pathologic grading of rectal adenocarcinoma: a preliminary study. Eur J Radiol 163

  11. Liu XS, Sha L, Huang C et al (2023) A nomogram prediction model for lymph node metastasis risk after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients based on SEER database. Front Oncol 13:9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP (2015) Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 16:E173–E180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Saadoun JE, Meillat H, Zemmour C et al (2022) Nomogram to predict disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing rectal surgery after neoadjuvant therapy: retrospective cohort study. Bjs Open 6:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin YF (2022) A prognostic nomogram for stage II/III rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. Bmc Surg 22:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morton D, Seymour M, Magill L et al (2023) Preoperative chemotherapy for operable colon cancer: mature results of an international randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 41:1541–1552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474

  17. Han LY, Mo SB, Xiang WQ et al (2020) Comparison of four lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis for stage IV rectum cancer. Ann Transl Med 8:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonetti LR, Barresi V, Bettelli S, Domati F, Palmiere C (2016) Poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) in colorectal cancer: what is and ought to be known. Diagn Pathol 11:4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB (2019) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 394:1467–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo YS, Liu LL, Liu DH et al (2023) Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT for the prediction of the pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 10

  21. Yang CB, He TP, Duan HF et al (2017) Quantitative assessment of the degree of differentiation in colon cancer with dual-energy spectral CT. Abdom Radiol 42:2591–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma BR, Kanneganti TD (2023) Inflammasome signaling in colorectal cancer. Transl Res 252:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson NM, Simon MC (2020) The tumor microenvironment. Curr Biol 30:R921–R925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong PJ, Yang B, Pan F, Hu F (2023) Temporal trends in Black-White disparities in cancer surgery and cancer-specific survival in the United States between 2007 and 2015. Cancer Med 11

  25. Brenne SS, Ness-Jensen E, Edna TH, Lydersen S, Laugsand EA (2023) Risk factors for right colon, left colon and rectal cancers differ between men and women: the population-based HUNT study in Norway. Colorectal Dis 12

  26. Lee RM, Cardona K, Russell MC (2019) Historical perspective: Two decades of progress in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 119:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alhumaid A, AlYousef Z, Bakhsh HA, AlGhamdi S, Aziz MA (2018) Emerging paradigms in the treatment of liver metastases in colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 132:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Japuntich SJ, Kumar P, Pendergast JF et al (2019) Smoking status and survival among a national cohort of lung and colorectal cancer patients. Nicotine Tob Res 21:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. New England J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373:811–820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(I) Conception and design: Jianping Zhang, Xiagang Luo, Yimin E; (II) Administrative support: Jianping Zhang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Xiagang Luo, Yimin E, Jie Wu; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Xiagang Luo, Yimin E; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Xiagang Luo, Yimin E, Chen Lu; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Xiagang Luo, Yimin E, Jie Wu contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

The SEER database is an open public database, and the release of data from the SEER database does not require informed patient consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 202 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, X., E, Y., Wu, J. et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in different grades of histologic differentiation in colorectal cancer patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and establishment of prognostic nomograms for moderately differentiated grade. Int J Colorectal Dis 38, 237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04539-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04539-x

Keywords

Navigation