Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perineural invasion is associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Perineural invasion (PNI) is associated with poor prognosis in a variety of cancers. Our aim was to determine the clinicopathological factors associated with PNI in colorectal cancer (CRC) and its impact on patient survival.

Material and methods

The clinical data of 1412 patients diagnosed with CRC from July 2013 to July 2016 were retrospectively collected. PNI was determined based on hematoxylin-eosin staining. The relationships of PNI with various clinicopathological factors and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of PNI in the entire cohort was 21.5%. PNI was significantly more common in patients with lower tumor differentiation, higher tumor stage, vascular invasion, TNM stage, tumor diameter, MMR/KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation, and more positive lymph nodes. Logistic regression analysis showed that T stage, vascular invasion, tumor diameter, and MMR were the main influencing factors of PNI. Cox regression analysis showed that poor tumor differentiation, N stage, TNM stage, PNI, and BRAF status were independent prognostic factors for OS. The OS, CSS, and PFS rate of the PNI (−) group was higher than that of the PNI (+) group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

PNI in patients with colorectal cancer is significantly associated with T stage, TNM stage, vessel invasion, tumor diameter, MMR status, and BRAF mutation. PNI status is an independent prognostic factor for CRC. Assessing the postoperative PNI status may help predict prognosis and determine further treatment options for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(2):104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP (2014) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383(9927):1490–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alotaibi AM, Lee JL, Kim J, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim TW et al (2017) Prognostic and oncologic significance of perineural invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24(6):1626–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knijn N, Mogk SC, Teerenstra S, Simmer F, Nagtegaal ID (2016) Perineural invasion is a strong prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Am J Surg Pathol 40(1):103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amit M, Binenbaum Y, Trejo-Leider L, Sharma K, Ramer N, Ramer I et al (2015) International collaborative validation of intraneural invasion as a prognostic marker in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 37(7):1038–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitsunaga S, Hasebe T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N et al (2007) Detail histologic analysis of nerve plexus invasion in invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas and its prognostic impact. Am J Surg Pathol 31(11):1636–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc 115(15):3379–3391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueno H, Shirouzu K, Eishi Y, Yamada K, Kusumi T, Kushima R et al (2013) Characterization of perineural invasion as a component of colorectal cancer staging. Am J Surg Pathol 37(10):1542–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Gabriel EM, LeVea CM, Kanehira K, Nurkin SJ (2017) Lymphovascular and perineural invasion are associated with poor prognostic features and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 37:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou Y, Wang H, Gong H, Cao M, Zhang G, Wang Y (2015) Clinical significance of perineural invasion in stages II and III colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 211(11):839–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2010) Lymphovascular or perineural invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14(7):1074–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Y, Huang X, Sun J, Gao P, Song Y, Chen X et al (2015) Prognostic value of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19(6):1113–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong JC, Guerra GR, Warrier SK, Lynch AC, Michael M, Ngan SY et al (2018) Prognostic value of tumour regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 20(7):574–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2010) Prognostic value of perineural invasion in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(8):2066–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchesi F, Piemonti L, Mantovani A, Allavena P (2010) Molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion, a forgotten pathway of dissemination and metastasis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 21(1):77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jobling P, Pundavela J, Oliveira SM, Roselli S, Walker MM, Hondermarck H (2015) Nerve-cancer cell cross-talk: a novel promoter of tumor progression. Cancer Res 75(9):1777–1781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Magnon C, Hall SJ, Lin J, Xue X, Gerber L, Freedland SJ et al (2013) Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science 341(6142):1236361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng J, Sheng W, Huang D, Venook AP, Xu Y, Guan Z et al (2011) Perineural invasion in pT3N0 rectal cancer: the incidence and its prognostic effect. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc 117(7):1415–1421

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peng SL, Thomas M, Ruszkiewicz A, Hunter A, Lawrence M, Moore J (2014) Conventional adverse features do not predict response to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. ANZ J Surg 84(11):837–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ceyhan GO, Liebl F, Maak M, Schuster T, Becker K, Langer R et al (2010) The severity of neural invasion is a crucial prognostic factor in rectal cancer independent of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Ann Surg 252(5):797–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han C, Song Y, Lian C (2018) MiR-769 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting HEY1. Med Sci Monit 24:9232–9239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang JW, Li LX, Wu WZ, Pan TJ, Yang ZS, Yang YK (2018) Anti-tumor effects of paeoniflorin on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human colorectal cancer cells. Med Sci Monit 24:6405–6413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer facts & figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, USA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cavallaro P, Bordeianou L, Stafford C, Clark J, Berger D, Cusack J et al (2020) Impact of single-organ metastasis to the liver or lung and genetic mutation status on prognosis in stage IV colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 19(1):e8–e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2019.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arrington AK, Heinrich EL, Lee W, Duldulao M, Patel S, Sanchez J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kim J (2012) Prognostic and predictive roles of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci 13:12153–12168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sinicrope A, Shi Q, Smyrk TC, Thibodeau SN, Dienstmann R, Guinney J et al (2015) Molecular markers identify subtypes of stage III colon cancer associated with patient outcomes. Gastroenterology. 148:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province (No. 2018CFC884), the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation of China (No. 320.2710.1843), and Clinical Research Physician Program of Tongji Medical College, HUST.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yinghao Cao, Shenghe Deng, Lizhao Yan, Junnan Gu, Fuwei Mao, Jiang Li, Ke Wu, and Kailin Cai meet all the criteria for the definition of authorship and contributed substantially to the manuscript. Yinghao Cao, Shenghe Deng, and Lizhao Yan contributed equally to this work and they were considered co-first authors. Ke Wu and Kailin Cai are the correspondent authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ke Wu or Kailin Cai.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Wuhan Union Medical College Hospital (No. 2018-S377) and all patients signed an informed consent to participate.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Y., Deng, S., Yan, L. et al. Perineural invasion is associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 1067–1075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03566-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03566-2

Keywords

Navigation