Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for treating slow-transit constipation (STC).
Method
This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the efficacy of SNS in treating patients affected by STC, who previously failed to respond to conservative therapies. Only patients free of concomitant diseases were enrolled in our study. A temporary stimulation lead was initially implanted; patients with a > 50% symptom reduction were eventually deemed eligible for a permanent implant.
Results
This study enrolled 25 patients who underwent a SNS test stimulation; 21 patients (13 women; median age 32 years) eventually got a permanent implant. The median preoperative Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) was 21 (16–25). Preoperative colorectal transit time recorded a median of 10 markers (7–19) retained in the colorectal tract. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, the total number of markers retained in the colorectal tract decreased to 3 (0–4). The CCCS score improved during the first postoperative year (P < 0.001), but progressively worsened over the longer term. The SF-36 questionnaire showed an improvement in all 8 scales measuring physical and psycho-emotional states; all parameters recorded into the bowel diary also improved. Overall, at 60-month follow up, the overall neuromodulator removal rate was 48%.
Conclusions
The SNS is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that we tested for treating STC. The short-term outcome was promisingly after 6 months; however, there was a declining trend beyond this interval. Thus, the long-term efficacy of SNS needs to be further assessed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holzer B, Rosen HR, Novi G, Ausch C, Hölbling N, Hofmann M, Schiessel R (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:524–530
Thomas GP, Dudding TC, Rahbour G, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2013) Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation. Br J Surg 100:174–181
Ratto C, Ganio E, Naldini G, GINS (2015) Long-term results following sacral nerve stimulation for chronic constipation. Color Dis 17:320–328
Maeda Y, O’Connell PR, Lehur PA, Matzel KE, Laurberg S, European SNS Bowel Study Group (2015) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation: a European consensus statement. Color Dis 17:O74–O87
Maeda Y, Kamm MA, Vaizey CJ, Matzel KE, Johansson C, Rosen H, Baeten CG, Laurberg S (2017) Long-term outcome of sacral neuromodulation for chronic refractory constipation. Tech Coloproctol 21:277–286
Pilkington SA, Emmett C, Knowles CH, Mason J, Yiannakou Y, the NIHR capacity working group and Pelvic Floor Society (2017) Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations. Color Dis 19:92–100
Dinning PG, Hunt L, Patton V, Zhang T, Szczesniak M, Gebski V, Jones M, Stewart P, Lubowski DZ, Cook IJ (2015) Treatment efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in slow transit constipation: a two-phase, double-blind randomized controlled crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol 110:733–740
Patton V, Stewart P, Lubowski DZ, Cook IJ, Dinning PG (2016) Sacral nerve stimulation fails to offer long-term benefit in patients with slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 59(9):878–885
McCallum IJD, Ong S, Mercer-Jones M (2009) Chronic constipation in adults. BMJ 338:b831
Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 59(12):1117–1133
Kamm MA, Dudding TC, Melenhorst J, Jarrett M, Wang Z, Buntzen S, Johansson C, Laurberg S, Rosen H, Vaizey CJ, Matzel K, Baeten C (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for intractable constipation. Gut 59:333–340
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short Form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306:1437–1440
Heymen S, Wexner SD, Gulledge AD (1993) MMPI assessment of patients with functional bowel disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 36:593–596
Schiano di Visconte M, Santoro GA, Cracco N, Sarzo G, Bellio G, Brunner M, Cui Z, Matzel KE (2018) Effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence after multimodal oncologic treatment for pelvic malignancies: a multicenter study with 2-year follow-up. Tech Coloproctol 22(2):97–105
Quigley EMM (2012) Prucalopride: safety, efficacy and potential applications. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 5:23–30
Sharma S, Agarwal BB (2012) Scoring systems in evaluation of constipation and obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). J Int Med Sci Acad 25:57–59
Sharma A, Bussen D, Herold A, Jayne D (2013) Review of sacral neuromodulation for management of constipation. Surg Innov 20:614–624
Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, Denis P (2001) Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:779–789
Nyam DCNK, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Rath DM (1997) Long-term results of surgery for chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:273–279
Knowles CH, Scott M, Lunniss PJ (1999) Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann Surg 230:627–638
Graf W, Sonesson AC, Lindberg B, Åkerud P, Karlbom U (2015) Results after sacral nerve stimulation for chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27:734–739
Wang Y, Wang Q, Kuerban K, Dong M, Qi F, Li G, Ling J, Qiu W, Zhang W, Ye L (2019) Colonic electrical stimulation promotes colonic motility through regeneration of myenteric plexus neurons in slow transit constipation beagles. Biosci Rep 39(5)
Moore JS, Gibson PR, Burgell RE (2018) Neuromodulation via interferential electrical stimulation as a novel therapy in gastrointestinal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 24(1):19–29
Carriero A, Martellucci J, Talento P, Ferrari CA (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: do we still miss something? Role of psychological evaluation. Int J Color Dis 25(8):1005–1010
Valori RM, Kumar D, Wingate DL (1986) Effects of different types of stress and of “prokinetic” drugs on the control of the fasting motor complex in humans. Gastroenterology 90:1890–1900
Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Color Dis 8:785–789
Malouf AJ, Wiesel PH, Nicholls T, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2002) Short term effects of sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic slow transit constipation. World J Surg 26:166–170
Ganio E, Masin A, Ratto C, Altomare DF, Ripetti V, Clerico G, Lise M, Doglietto GB, Memeo V, Landolfi V, del Genio A, Arullani A, Giardiello G, de Seta F (2001) Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients: evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1261–1267
Heemskerk SCM, Rotteveel AH, Benninga MA et al (2017) Sacral neuromodulation versus personalized conservative treatment in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation: study protocol of the No. 2-trial, a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Conference 12th Scientific Annual Meeting European Society of Coloproctology. Color Dis 19:140–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13799
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSdV and GB conceived and designed the study; MSdV, GB, AP, and TCM acquired data; MSdV, GB, LB, and LD interpreted data. MSdV, GB, AP, TCM, and LB drafted the manuscript. All authors have read, critically revised, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration, as last amended at the 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013, or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent by the institutional research committee is not required in Italy.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants enrolled in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schiano di Visconte, M., Pasquali, A., Cipolat Mis, T. et al. Sacral nerve stimulation in slow-transit constipation: effectiveness at 5-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 1529–1540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03351-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03351-w