Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has spread globally. The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients was initially indicated by comparison with open surgery. However, whether the procedure is safe for elderly as well as non-elderly patients with colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

In this review, patients aged ≥ 75 were defined as elderly. We conducted literature searches using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials. Two authors independently reviewed resultant articles to identify relevant observational studies. Data synthesis was performed with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by using forest plots and I2 statistics. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed by the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.

Results

Twenty-two studies were included. The incidence of overall complications was slightly higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients, with statistical significance (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.34). There was no difference between them in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.86–1.80) and mortality (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is mostly safe for elderly patients as well as non-elderly patients. Preoperative comorbidities or poor physical capacity should be cared for in the elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22:704–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiphorst AH, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes IH, Hamaker ME (2014) Representation of the elderly in trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 16:976–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 27:19–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2015) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients. Surg Endosc 29:322–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y, Shimada R, Okamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Nozawa K, Matsuda K, Hashiguchi Y (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8:573–582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arimoto A, Hasegawa H, Sugiyama H, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Tominaga M, Sumi Y, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2017) Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study. Anticancer Res 37:4195–4198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bottino V, Esposito MG, Mottola A, Marte G, di Maio V, Sciascia V, Nunziante M, Fregola G, Cuzzovaglia S, Galante F, Andreoli F, Breglia A, Giuliano ME, Papaleo D, Della Rocca P, Maida P (2012) Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg 12(Suppl 1):S8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Denet C, Fuks D, Cocco F, Chopinet S, Abbas M, Costea C, Levard H, Perniceni T, Gayet B (2017) Effects of age after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: are there any specific outcomes? Dig Liver Dis 49:562–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiscon V, Portale G, Frigo F, Migliorini G (2010) Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients. Tech Coloproctol 14:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirano Y, Hattori M, Sato Y, Maeda K, Douden K, Hashizume Y (2012) The outcome of single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for colon carcinoma in the elderly. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:338–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue Y, Kawamoto A, Okugawa Y et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3:897–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2013) Safety and feasibility of a laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients. Ann Coloproctol 29:22–27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang T, Kim HO, Kim H, Chun HK, Han WK, Jung KU (2015) Age over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Coloproctol 31:228–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazama K, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Numata M, Amano S, Kamiya M, Sato T, Yoshikawa T, Shiozawa M, Oshima T, Yukawa N, Rino Y, Masuda M (2017) Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401). BMC Surg 17:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kvasnovsky CL, Adams K, Sideris M, Laycock J, Haji AK, Haq A, Nunoo-Mensah J, Papagrigoriadis S (2016) Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 18:94–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim SW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age: the morbidity outcomes. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:423–428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Mori T, Nakashima M, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for colorectal neoplasm is justifiable regardless of advanced age. Hepatogastroenterology 51:152–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Onozato W, Sato T, Ikeda A, Naito M, Ogura N, Kamata H, Ooki A, Watanabe M (2011) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer: a comparison of patients 64 years or younger with those 75 years or older. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1200–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Otsuka K, Kimura T, Hakozaki M, Yaegashi M, Matsuo T, Fujii H, Sato K, Hatanaka T, Sasaki A (2017) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients. Surg Today 47:587–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Wierdak M, Major P, Rubinkiewicz M, Kisielewski M, Matyja M, Lasek A, Budzyński A (2015) The use of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer--a comparative analysis of patients aged above 80 and below 55. Pol Przegl Chir 87:565–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roscio F, Boni L, Clerici F, Frattini P, Cassinotti E, Scandroglio I (2016) Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment. Surg Endosc 30:4372–4382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan KY, Konishi F, Kawamura YJ, Maeda T, Sasaki J, Tsujinaka S, Horie H (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a case-control study of 15 years of experience. Am J Surg 201:531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tokuhara K, Nakatani K, Ueyama Y, Yoshioka K, Kon M (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 27:66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, Jang BH, Son HJ (2013) Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol 66:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic review of intervention 5. 1. 0. The cochrane collaboration

  30. Millan M, Merino S, Caro A, Feliu F, Escuder J, Francesch T (2015) Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7:204–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Biondi A, Vacante M, Ambrosino I, Cristaldi E, Pietrapertosa G, Basile F (2016) Role of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:606–613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This review was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Funding

This review was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant reference number: 16K10538).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida & Yoshiharu Sakai

Authors
  1. Nobuaki Hoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yudai Fukui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koya Hida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshiharu Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuaki Hoshino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoshino, N., Fukui, Y., Hida, K. et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 377–386 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03234-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03234-0

Keywords