Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare perioperative colorectal cancer care and survival in patient cohorts operated in 2005 and in 2010 in Lithuania.

Methods

Comparative observational cohort study was performed. The study was conducted in the three Lithuanian cancer hospitals. Patients, who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer in 2005 and 2010, were included. Demographic characteristics, distribution of the tumors, preoperative diagnostics and staging, surgical treatment, the quality of pathological examination, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. One- and 5-year overall survival data were compared between the groups.

Results

Colorectal cancer diagnostics and treatment improved from 2005 to 2010 significantly. The disease was identified as stage III–IV for 45 vs. 48% of the patients; however, computed tomography staging scan was performed only for 5.9 vs. 17.8% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. Laparoscopic operations were performed 1.5 vs. 10.5% and abdominoperineal resections—42.7 vs. 31.7% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. The number of harvested lymph nodes was mentioned in 55.8 vs. 97.7% of the cases, whereas more than 12 lymph nodes were examined in 18 vs. 66.6% of cases after histological examination. The overall 5-year survival was 52.1 vs. 63.1% (p < 0.0001), while the 5-year survival of the patients with stage IV of disease was 4.2 vs. 17.8% in 2005 and 2010, respectively.

Conclusion

Preoperative investigation, surgical treatment, pathological examination, and postoperative course are associated with improved overall survival in colorectal cancer patients, undergoing curative surgery in the resource-limited settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lunevicius R, Poskus T, Samalavicius NE (2015) National burden of colorectal cancer in Lithuania and country’s ranking across 45 European nations. Oncol Lett 10(1):433–438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP et al (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15(1):23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poškus E, Mikalauskas S, Jotautas V, Žeromskas P, Poškus T, Strupas K, Samalavičius NE, Lasinskas M, Sklepavičius A, Tamelis A, Saladžinskas Ž, Pavalkis D, Jakaitienė A, Smailytė G (2013) The pattern of colorectal cancer surgery in Lithuania in 2005: do results meet expectations? Medicina 49(3):124–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poskus T, Strupas K, Mikalauskas S, Bitinaitė D, Kavaliauskas A, Samalavicius NE, Saladzinskas Z (2015) Initial results of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania. Eur J Cancer Prev 24(2):76–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Påhlman L, Laurberg S, Søreide O (2001) Structuring rectal cancer treatment in Scandinavia. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(4):855–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bülow S, Harling H, Iversen LH, Ladelund S, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2010) Improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark. Color Dis 12(7 Online):e37–e42

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D et al (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(10):1063–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Breugom AJ, Boelens PG, van den Broek CB et al (2014) Quality assurance in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the EURECCA initiative. Ann Oncol 25(8):1485–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guren MG, Kørner H, Pfeffer F, Myklebust TÅ, Eriksen MT, Edna TH, Larsen SG, Knudsen KO, Nesbakken A, Wasmuth HH, Vonen B, Hofsli E, Færden AE, Brændengen M, Dahl O, Steigen SE, Johansen MJ, Lindsetmo RO, Drolsum A, Tollåli G, Dørum LM, Møller B, Wibe A (2015) Nationwide improvement of rectal cancer treatment outcomes in Norway, 1993–2010. Acta Oncol 54(10):1714–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingeholm P, Gögenur I, Iversen LH (2016) Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database. Clin Epidemiol 8:465–468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Govaert JA, van Dijk WA, Fiocco M, Scheffer AC, Gietelink L, Wouters MWJM, Tollenaar RAEM (2016) Nationwide outcomes measurement in colorectal cancer surgery: improving quality and reducing costs. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):19–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurer CA, Dietrich D, Schilling MK, Metzger U, Laffer U, Buchmann P, Lerf B, Villiger P, Melcher G, Klaiber C, Bilat C, Brauchli P, Terracciano L, Kessler K (2017) Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality—Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00. Int J Color Dis 32(1):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanters A, Mullard AJ, Arambula J, Fasbinder L, Krapohl G, Wong SL, Campbell da Jr, Hendren S (2016) Colorectal cancer: quality of surgical care in Michigan. Am J Surg 213(3):548–552

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Becerra AZ, Probst CP, Tejani MA, Aquina CT, González MG, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ (2015) Opportunity lost: adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer remains underused. Surgery 158(3):692–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL, Hendren S, Mutch M, Deshpande AD, Jeffe DB, Davidson NO (2014) Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications. Ann Surg Oncol 21(8):2659–2666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do multidisciplinary team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V et al (2014) Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol 20(13):3680–3692

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29(12):3443–3453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Theophilus M, Platell C, Spilsbury K (2014) Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Color Dis 16(3):O75–O81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arezzo A, Passera R, Salvai A, Arolfo S, Allaix ME, Schwarzer G, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Surg Endosc 29(2):334–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de'Angelis N (2017) Pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 152(4):e165665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5665

  22. Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets GL, Pierie JP, Wiggers T, Breukink S (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD005200. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3

  23. Benz S, Barlag H, Gerken M, Fürst A, Klinkhammer-Schalke M (2017) Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Surg Endosc 31(6):2586–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5266-2

  24. Dobbins TA, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2014) Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 57(4):415–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Morino M (2016) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 30(11):4841–4852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM, the Pathology Review Committee for the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Color Dis 3(2):127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9(9):857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu ZR, Rajendran N, Lynch AC, Heriot AG, Warrier SK (2016) Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 59(3):236–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2016) The impact of the type and severity of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 97:168–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stormark K, Søreide K, Søreide JA, Kvaløy JT, Pfeffer F, Eriksen MT, Nedrebø BS, Kørner H (2016) Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort. Surg Endosc 30(11):4853–4864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Kryzauskas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poskus, E., Kryzauskas, M., Poskus, T. et al. Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 779–785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3021-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3021-y

Keywords

Navigation