Abstract
Purpose
Among individuals who respond well to preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for ypT0–1, local excision (LE) could provide acceptable oncological outcomes. However, in ypT2 cases, the oncological safety of LE has not been determined. This study aimed to compare oncological outcomes between LE and total mesorectal excision of ypT2-stage rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy and investigate the oncological safety of LE in these patients.
Methods
We included 351 patients who exhibited ypT2-stage rectal cancer after CRT followed by LE (n = 16 [5%]) or total mesorectal excision (TME) (n = 335 [95%]) after preoperative CRT between January 2007 and December 2013. After propensity matching, oncological outcomes between LE group and TME group were compared.
Results
The median follow-up period was 57 months (range, 12–113 months). In the LE group, local recurrence occurred more frequently (18 vs. 4%; p = 0.034) but not distant metastases (12 vs. 11%; p = 0.690). The 5-year local recurrence-free (76 vs. 96%; p = 0.006), disease-free (64 vs. 84%; p = 0.075), and overall survival (79 vs. 93%; p = 0.045) rates of the LE group were significantly lower than those of the TME group. After propensity matching, 5-year local recurrence-free survival of the LE group was significantly lower than that of the TME group (76 vs. 97%, p = 0.029).
Conclusion
The high local failure rate and poor oncological outcomes for ypT2-stage rectal cancer patients who undergo CRT followed by LE cannot be justified as an indication for LE. Salvage surgery should be recommended in these patients.
References
Kim JY, Park IJ, Hong SM, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Lim SB, Lee JB, Yu CS, Kim JC (2015) Is pathologic near-total regression an appropriate indicator of a good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on oncologic outcome of disease? Medicine (Baltimore) 94(50):e2257. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000002257
Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rödel C, Kuo LJ, Calvo FA, García-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Haustermans K, Mohiuddin M, Pucciarelli S, Small W Jr, Suárez J, Theodoropoulos G, Biondo S, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11(9):835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70172-8
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240(4):711–717 discussion 717-718
Jung SM, Yu CS, Park IJ, Kim TW, Kim JH, Yoon YS, Lim SB, Kim JC (2016) Oncologic safety of local excision compared with total mesorectal excision for ypT0-T1 rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(20):e3718. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000003718
Borschitz T, Wachtlin D, Mohler M, Schmidberger H, Junginger T (2008) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2-3 rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15(3):712–720. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9732-x
Park IJ, You YN, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Feig B, Nguyen S, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2013) Comparative analysis of LN metastases in patients with ypT0-2 rectal cancers after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):135–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318278ff8a
Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12(1):19–23
Pucciarelli S, De Paoli A, Guerrieri M et al (2013) Local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 56(12):1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a2303e
Yeo SG, Kim DY, Kim TH, Chang HJ, Oh JH, Park W, Choi DH, Nam H, Kim JS, Cho MJ, Kim JH, Park JH, Kang MK, Koom WS, Kim JS, Nam TK, Chie EK, Kim JS, Lee KJ (2010) Pathologic complete response of primary tumor following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status (KROG 09-01). Ann Surg 252(6):998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f3f1b1
Lee NK, Kim DY, Kim SY, Oh JH, Park W, Choi DH, Nam TK, Lee KJ (2014) Clinical outcomes of local excision following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 46(2):158–164. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.158
Verseveld M, de Graaf EJ, Verhoef C et al (2015) Chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the distal rectum followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (CARTS study). Br J Surg 102(7):853–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9809
Collette L, Bosset JF, den Dulk M, Nguyen F, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Piérart M, Calais G, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group (2007) Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 25(28):4379–4386. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.11.9685
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, K.M., Lim, SB., Lee, J.L. et al. Local excision for ypT2 rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation therapy: it should not be justified. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 487–491 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-2973-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-2973-2