Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of surgical quality on prognosis in patients undergoing rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of surgical quality on the prognosis of rectal carcinoma patients who underwent preoperative long-term chemoradiation and TME surgery.

Methods

In a total of 314 patients, four quality indicators, including plane of surgery, pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM), intraoperative local tumour cell dissemination and anastomotic leakage, were analysed with respect to locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and overall survival.

Results

In 260 (82.8 %) of the patients, all four quality indicators were fulfilled. In 30 (9.6 %) of the patients, at least one quality indicator was not fulfilled; in 24 (7.6 %) of the patients, the data were not complete. Locoregional recurrence was significantly increased in patients who underwent surgery in the muscularis propria plane, who had a pCRM ≤ 1 mm or who experienced local tumour cell dissemination. In patients who had at least one quality indicator that was not fulfilled (suboptimal surgical quality), the 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence in those patients was 23.1 % compared to 4.8 % in patients who underwent optimal surgery (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, suboptimal surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 3.9; P = 0.020), abdominoperineal excision (HR 4.7; P = 0.003) and poor regression of primary tumours (HR 8.5; P < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence. In contrast to type of surgical treatment, ypT, ypN and regression grade, the quality of surgery did not significantly influence distant metastasis or overall survival.

Conclusions

Even after preoperative chemoradiation, the surgical quality still has a strong impact on local control in patients with rectal carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hermanek P, Wiebelt H, Staimmer D, Riedl S (1995) Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma—experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma. Tumori 81(3 Suppl):60–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J of Sur 69(10):613–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 1.1, 2014, AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 021-007OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 25 June 2015

  4. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Graeven U, Arnold D, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Sulberg H, Wittekind C, Potapov S, Staib L, Hess C, Weigang-Kohler K, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(7):679–687. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70187-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loughrey M, Quirke P, Shepherd N, Coordinators, The Royal College of Pathologists (2014) Loughrey M, Quirke P, Shepherd N, Coordinators, The Royal College of Pathologists. Dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports, 3rd ed. 2014. x. http://www.rcpath.org/Resources/RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/G/G049_ColorectalDataset_July14.pdf; . Accessed 25 June 2015

  7. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12(1):19–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, Fuzesi L, Klimpfinger M, Fietkau R, Liersch T, Hohenberger W, Raab R, Sauer R, Wittekind C (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(34):8688–8696. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermanek P, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2013) Prognosis of rectal carcinoma after multimodal treatment: ypTNM classification and tumor regression grading are essential. Anticancer Res 33(2):559–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26(2):303–312. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Trakarnsanga A, Gonen M, Shia J, Goodman KA, Nash GM, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Weiser MR (2013) What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1179–1184. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2722-7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK (2014) A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 57(8):933–940. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merkel S, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2010) Intra-operative local tumor cell dissemination in rectal carcinoma surgery: effect of operation principles and neoadjuvant therapy. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 81(8):719–727. doi:10.1007/s00104-010-1919-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Merkel S, Wang WY, Schmidt O, Dworak O, Wittekind C, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2001) Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology Great B Irel 3(3):154–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was performed in fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.” at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU). It was partly presented at the 132nd Congress of the German Society of Surgery, 28.04.-01.05.2015, Munich, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Merkel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiehlmann, M., Weber, K., Göhl, J. et al. The impact of surgical quality on prognosis in patients undergoing rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Int J Colorectal Dis 31, 247–255 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2421-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2421-5

Keywords

Navigation