Skip to main content
Log in

Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Persistent anal pain (PAP) after stapled procedures, be it hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) or stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) may be hardly resolved by medical therapy. The typical objective finding in these patients is the staple line characterized by fixed scar to underlying layers.

Methods

A total of 21 consecutive patients were operated for PAP after stapled procedure. The scarred staple line was excised and detached from layers below, the mucosal continuity reconstructed by single stitches. From January 2003 to December 2013 1500 patients underwent stapled procedure. Of these patients treated in our unit, 9 (0.6 %) were operated for chronic anal pain and 12 were referred to our center from other hospitals.

Results

Fifteen (71.4 %) patients resolved and do not take any drugs for pain; an overall of 85.7 % (18/21) improved their clinical status. Mean time between the beginning of symptoms and the operation was 4.27 months (range 1–18 months). We divided the patients into three groups: before 3 months, between 3 and 6 months and after 6 months from the beginning of symptoms to the operation. The best results were in the first group with 100 % pain relief and satisfactory functional results.

Conclusions

The relief of PAP after stapled procedure, in which we recognize a scarred and fixed staple line, depends by the early recognition of this typical finding. The authors suggest the surgical treatment not later than 3–6 months after the onset of symptoms to achieve the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sileri P, Stolfi VM, Franceschilli L, Perrone F, Patrizi L, Gaspari AL (2008) Reintervantions for specific technique-related complications of stapled Haemorrhoidopexy (SH): a critical appraisal. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1866–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basso L, Pescatori M, La Torre F, Destefano I, Pulvirenti D’Urso A, Infantino A, Amato A (2013) Emerging technologies in coloproctology: results of the Italian society of Colorectal surgery logbook of adverse events. Tech Coloproctol 17:207–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, Accarpio GM, Dodi G, Cavallari F, Ravo B, Annibali R (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, Milito G, Dodi G, Mascagni D, Orsini S, Pietroletti R, Ripetti V, Tagariello GB (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson S, Jongen J, Schwenk W (2011) Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 15:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregòn L, Duque-Lopez X, Miranda-gomez A, Pichardo-Bahena R, Mendez M, Moran S (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after staplerd rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: a need for preservation of squamous epithelium. Dis colon Rectum 46(7):955–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L, Romano N, Rossi M (2009) Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(5):537–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao Y, Ding JH, Yin SH, Hou XL, Zhao K (2013) Predictors of early postoperative pain after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 16(6):206–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiarioni G, Asteria C, Whitehed WE (2011) Chronic proctalgia and chronic pelvic pain syndromes: new etiologic insighths and treatment options. World J Gastroenterol 17(40):4447–4455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Martellucci J, Naldini G, Del Popolo G, Carriero A (2012) Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pain after pelvic surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(4):502–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mari FS, Nigri G, Dall'Oglio A, Cosenza UM, Milillo A, Terrenato I, Pancaldi A, Brescia A (2013) Topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment for pain related to anal hypertonia after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 56:768–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL (2005) Postdefecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 92:208–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacopo Martellucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menconi, C., Fabiani, B., Giani, I. et al. Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line. Int J Colorectal Dis 31, 41–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2355-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2355-y

Keywords

Navigation