Easy clip to treat anal fistula tracts: a word of caution

Abstract

Background and aims

Closing the internal opening by a clip ovesco has been recently proposed for healing the fistula tract, but, to date, data on benefit are poorly analyzed. The aim was to report a preliminary multicenter experience.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study was undertaken in six different French centers: surgical procedure, immediate complications, and follow-up have been collected.

Results

Nineteen clips were inserted in 17 patients (M/F, 4/13; median age, 42 years [29–54]) who had an anal fistula: 12 (71 %) high fistulas (including 4 rectovaginal fistulas), 5 (29 %) lower fistulas (with 3 rectovaginal fistulas), and 6 (35 %) Crohn’s fistulas. Out of 17 patients, 15 had a seton drainage beforehand. The procedure was easy in 8 (47 %) patients and the median operative time was 27.5 min (20–36.5). Postoperative period was painful for 11 (65 %) patients. A clip migration was noted in 11 patients (65 %) after a median follow-up of 10 days (5.5–49.8). Eleven patients (65 %) who failed had reoperation including 10 new drainages within the first month (0.5–5). After a mean follow-up of 4 months (2–7),, closing the tract was observed in 2 patients (12 %) following the first insertion of the clip and in another one after a second insertion.

Conclusion

Treatment of anal fistula by placing a clip on the internal opening is disappointing and deleterious for some patients. A better assessment before dissemination is recommended.