Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients

International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is validated as an efficient treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). However, long-term results are scarce in the literature. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of SNS on FI symptoms and quality of life, based on a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Methods

From 2001 to 2009, 119 patients (six men, mean age 61 years) underwent SNS testing for FI after an extensive diagnostic workup. Permanent implantation was realized when FI symptoms improved during testing, and follow-up visits were performed every 12 months thereafter. This follow-up evaluated morbidity and efficacy, based on clinical data and self-administered questionnaires including Jorge and Wexner FI score, urinary incontinence score (urinary distress inventory-6, UDI-6), gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI), and auto-evaluation scale.

Results

A permanent stimulator was implanted after a positive test in 102 patients (91 %). Ten patients were explanted during follow-up (pain in one case and absence of efficacy in nine), and 29 had the stimulator and/or the electrode changed. The mean follow-up was 48 months (range 12–84): there was a significant improvement of FI score (9 ± 1 vs 14 ± 3, p < 0.0001), UDI-6 score (8 ± 4 vs 11 ± 5, p < 0.05), and GIQLI index (p < 0.002). The improvement was present at 12 months follow-up and remained stable. Eighty percent of patients were satisfied with the treatment at the last point of follow-up. None of the pretreatment variables were predictive of SNS efficacy.

Conclusions

SNS improved FI and quality of life, and this efficacy remained over time. Although a complete disappearance of FI was rare, most patients were satisfied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E, Bresler L, Portier G, Michot F (2005) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg 242:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leroi AM, Damon H, Faucheron JL, Lehur PA, Siproudhis L, Slim K, Barbieux JP, Barth X, Borie F, Bresler L, Desfourneaux V, Goudet P, Huten N, Lebreton G, Mathieu P, Meurette G, Mathonnet M, Mion F, Orsoni P, Parc Y, Portier G, Rullier E, Sielezneff I, Zerbib F, Michot F (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience. Color Dis 11:572–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, Fraser C, Nicholls RJ, Grant AM, Kamm MA (2004) Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 91:1559–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ (2010) Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29:213–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Michelsen HB, Thompson-Fawcett M, Lundby L, Krogh K, Laurberg S, Buntzen S (2010) Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53:414–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle DJ, Murphy J, Gooneratne ML, Grimmer K, Allison ME, Chan CL, Williams NS (2011) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mellgren A, Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Lerew DR, Madoff RD, Hull T (2011) Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1065–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Knowles CH, Scott SM, Legg PE, Allison ME, Lunniss PJ (2002) Level of classification performance of KESS (symptom scoring system for constipation) validated in a prospective series of 105 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:842–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1999) Première validation de la version française de l'index de qualité de vie pour les maladies digestives (GIQLI). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23:25–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, Robaye E (1989) Validation de la version française du HADS dansune population de patients cancéreux hospitalisés. Rev Psychol Appl 39:285–308

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bartram CI, Sultan AH (1995) Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut 37:4–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fynes M, Behan M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell P (2000) Anal vector volume analysis complements endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury. Br J Surg 87:1209–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nosbaum A, Rival-Tringali AL, Barth X, Damon H, Vital-Durand D, Claudy A, Faure M (2008) Nickel-induced systemic allergic dermatitis from a sacral neurostimulator. Contact Dermatitis 59:319–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 251:441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim JT, Hastie IA, Hiscock RJ, Shedda SM (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54:969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dudding TC, Hollingshead JR, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: patient selection, service provision and operative technique. Color Dis 13:e187–e195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray-Green C (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg 91:755–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis K, Kumar D, Stanton SL, Thakar R, Fynes M, Bland J (2003) Symptoms and anal sphincter morphology following primary repair of third-degree tears. Br J Surg 90:1573–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hetzer FH, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) Quality of life and morbidity after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Arch Surg 142:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maeda Y, Matzel K, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2011) Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1443–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ripetti V, Caputo D, Ausania F, Esposito E, Bruni R, Arullani A (2002) Sacral nerve neuromodulation improves physical, psychological and social quality of life in patients with fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 6:147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendorfer M, Zhang W (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Color Dis 11:636–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R, Mellgren A, Nicholls RJ, Rius J, Rosen H (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363:1270–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wexner SD, Hull T, Edden Y, Coller JA, Devroede G, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A (2010) Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1081–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG (2004) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1350–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gourcerol G, Gallas S, Michot F, Denis P, Leroi AM (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success? Dis Colon Rectum 50:3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chan MK, Tjandra JJ (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1015–1024, discussion 1024–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, Donisi L, Doglietto GB (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation is a valid approach in fecal incontinence due to sphincter lesions when compared to sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 53:264–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dudding TC, Pares D, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis. Color Dis 10:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

F. Mion and S. Roman received honoraria from Medtronic France.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Mion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damon, H., Barth, X., Roman, S. et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 227–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1558-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1558-8

Keywords

Navigation