Abstract
Introduction
We performed a meta-analysis to compare the clinical and endoscopic recurrence of medical treatment and placebo treatment for preventing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease.
Materials and methods
Trials were located through Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, Sciencedirect, and Ingenta electronic databases. From 124 articles screened, 14 were identified as randomized placebo-controlled trials and were included for data extraction. Main outcome measures were clinical recurrence, endoscopic recurrence, and severe endoscopic recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed with the fixed-effects model.
Result
Fourteen studies with 1,497 participants were analyzed. In the intention-to-treat analysis, medical treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of clinical recurrence (relative risk of 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.87, P = 0.000], but there were no significant differences in endoscopic recurrence (0.94, 0.83–1.07, P = 0.353) and severe endoscopic recurrence (0.83, 0.60–1.16, P = 0.281) between the two groups. When using per-protocol analysis, the results is similar, medical treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of clinical recurrence (0.84, 0.72–0.97, P = 0.020), but there were no significant differences in endoscopic recurrence (0.94, 0.85–1.05, P = 0.268) or severe endoscopic recurrence (0.76, 0.55–1.04, P = 0.084) between the two groups of patients.
Conclusions
Medical treatment has a sufficiently beneficial effect on decreasing the risk of clinical postoperative recurrence in patients with CD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Podolsky DK (2002) Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 347:417–429
Tamboli CP (2007) Current medical therapy for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Surg Clin North Am 87:697–725
Fichera A, Michelassi F (2007) Surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. J Gastrointest Surg 11:791–803
Steele SR (2007) Operative management of Crohn’s disease of the colon including anorectal disease. Surg Clin North Am 87:611–631
Terdiman JP (2008) Prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:616–620 (Oct 27)
Achkar JP, Hanauer SB (2000) Medical therapy to reduce postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1139–1146
Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M (1990) Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 99:956–963
Penner RM, Madsen KL, Fedorak RN (2005) Postoperative Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:765–777
Froehlich F, Juillerat P, Felley C, Mottet C, Vader JP, Burnand B, Michetti P, Gonvers JJ (2005) Treatment of postoperative Crohn’s disease. Digestion 71:49–53
Hellers G, Cortot A, Jewell D, Leijonmarck CE, Lofberg R, Malchow H, Nilsson LG, Pallone F, Pena S, Persson T, Prantera C, Rutgeerts P (1999) Oral budesonide for prevention of postsurgical recurrence in Crohn’s disease. The IOIBD Budesonide Study Group. Gastroenterology 116:294–300
Lémann M (2006) Review article: can post-operative recurrence in Crohn’s disease be prevented? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24(Suppl 3):22–28
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12
Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C (2001) Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 135:982–989
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613
Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F (2000) Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley, Chichester
Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P (1985) Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335–371
Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, London
Brignola C, Cottone M, Pera A, Ardizzone S, Scribano ML, De Franchis R, D’Arienzo A, D’Albasio G, Pennestri D (1995) Mesalamine in the prevention of endoscopic recurrence after intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 108:345–349
Colombel J-F, Rutgeerts P, Malchow H, Jacyna M, Nielsen OH, Rask-Madsen J et al (2001) Interleukin 10 (Tenovil) in the prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Gut 49:42–46
Ewe K, Bottger T, Buhr HJ, Ecker KW, Otto HF (1999) Low-dose budesonide treatment for prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease: a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:277–282
Florent C, Cortot A, Quandale P, Sanhoud T, Modigliani R, Sarfaty E, Group d’Etudes Therapeutiques des AffectionsInflammatoires Digestives(GETAID) et al (1996) Placebo-controlled clinical trial of mesalazine in the prevention of early recurrence after resection for Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:229–233
Hanauer SB, Korelitz BI, Rutgeerts P, Peppercorn MA, Thisted RA, Cohen RD, Present DH (2004) Post-operative maintenance of Crohn’s disease remission with 6-mercaptopurine, mesalamine or placebo: a 2-year trial. Gastroenterology 127:723–729
Hellers G, Cortot A, Jewell D et al (1999) Oral budesonide for prevention of postsurgical recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 116:294–300
Lochs H, Mayer M, Fleig W, Mortensen PB, Bauer P, Genser D, Petritsch W, Raithel M, Hoffmann R, Gross V, Plauth M, Staun M, Nesje LB (2000) Prophylaxis of postoperative relapse in Crohn’s disease with mesalamine: European Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study VI. Gastroenterology 118:264–273
Marteau P, Lemann M, Seksik P et al (2005) Ineffectiveness of Lactobacillus johnsonii LA1 for prophylaxis of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled GETAID trial. Gut 23:23
McLeod RS, Wolff BG, Steinhart AH, Carryer PW, O’Rourke K, Andrews DF, Blair JE, Cangemi JR, Cohen Z, Cullen JB, Chaytor RG, Greenberg GR, Jaffer NM, Jeejeebhoy KN, MacCarty RL, Ready RL, Weiland LH (1995) Prophylactic mesalamine treatment decreases postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 109:404–413
Prantera C, Scribano ML, Falasco G, Andreoli A, Luzi C (2002) Ineffectiveness of probiotics in preventing recurrence after curative resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomised controlled trial with Lactobacillus GG. Gut 51:405–409
Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Geboes K et al (1995) Controlled trial of metronidazole treatment for prevention of Crohn’s recurrence after ileal resection. Gastroenterology 108:1617–1621
Rutgeerts P, Van Assche G, Vermeire S et al (2005) Ornidazole for prophylaxis of postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 128:856–861
Sutherland LR, Martin F, Bailey RJ, Fedorak RN, Poleski M, Dallaire C et al (1997) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of mesalamine in the maintenance of remission of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 112:1069–1077
Van Gossum A, Dewit O, Louis E, de Hertogh G, Baert F, Fernand Fontaine P et al (2007) Multicenter randomized-controlled clinical trial of probiotics (Lactobacillus johnsonii, LA1) on early endoscopic recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileo-caecal resection. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13:135–142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y., Gao, F., Liao, C. et al. Meta-analysis of medical treatment and placebo treatment for preventing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease (CD). Int J Colorectal Dis 24, 509–520 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0640-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0640-3