Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term manometric study of anal sphincter function after hemorrhoidectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

Data on maximum resting pressure (MRP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) changes after hemorrhoidectomy are not univocal and follow-up of patients undergoing surgery is mostly short-lived. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine during 1-year follow-up the long-term manometric results of MRP, MSP, and ultra slow wave activity (USWA) within a set of patients undergoing Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy as compared to healthy controls.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients with hemorrhoids of third and fourth degree were enrolled and anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively, on the 5th day, and after 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

On the 5th and 30th day after hemorrhoidectomy, USWA was slightly increased as compared to preoperative status. Six and 12 months after surgery, patients with USWA were significantly less in comparison to preoperative assessment without differences with healthy subjects. After surgery, MSP values were not significantly different to baseline values. On the 5th postoperative day after hemorrhoidectomy, MRP was significantly greater than baseline preoperative values. Thirty days after surgery, MRP values were similar to those detected preoperatively, but still significantly increased as compared to healthy subjects. After 6 and 12 months, MRP values were significantly lower than those detected during preoperative phase and comparable to healthy subjects.

Conclusions

Our data support that Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy induces a complete resolution of typical manometric alterations of disease and that the excision of anal cushions is responsible only for mild and transient alteration of anal continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomson WH (1975) The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 62:542–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R (1989) The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:118–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RK (1994) Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 81:946–954

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Madoff RD, Fleshman JW (2004) American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids. Gastroenterology 126:1463–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American Society of Anesthesiologists (1963) New classification of physiology status. Anesthesiology 24:111

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A (1990) The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 98:380–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frenckner B, Euler CV (1975) Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 16:482–489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hancock BD (1977) Internal sphincter and the nature of haemorrhoids. Gut 18:651–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M (1985) Anal manometric findings in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 28:807–809

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafik A (1984) The pathogenesis of hemorrhoids and their treatment by anorectal bandotomy. J Clin Gastroenterol 6:129–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun WM, Read NW, Shorthouse AJ (1990) Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal canal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 77:458–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teramoto T, Parks AG, Swash M (1981) Hypertrophy of the external and sphincter in haemorrhoids: a histometric study. Gut 22:45–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR (1977) Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissure. Am J Surg 134:608–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Deutsch AA, Moshkovitz M, Nudelman I, Dinari G, Reiss R (1987) Anal pressure measurements in the study of hemorrhoid etiology and their relation to treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 30:855–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bursics A, Weltner J, Flautner LE, Morvay K (2004) Ano-rectal physiological changes after rubber band ligation and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 6:58–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin JK (2001) Preservation of anal sphincter function after hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 64:519–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lau PYY, Meng WCS, Yip AWC (2004) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in Chinese patients: a prospective randomised control study. Hong Kong Med J 10:373–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS (1995) Haemorrhoidectomy and disordered rectal and anal physiology in patients with prolapsed haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 82:596–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho YH, Tan M (1997) Ambulatory anorectal manometric findings in patients before and after haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:296–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Champigneulle B, Dieterling P, Bigard MA, Gaucher P (1989) Prospective study of the function of the anal sphincter before and after hemorrhoidectomy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 13:452–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Navarra L (1998) Anal pressures after hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alper D, Ram E, Stein GY, Dreznik Z (2005) Resting anal pressure following hemorrhoidectomy and lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2080–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG (1982) A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continence. Br J Surg 69:396–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Patti R, Almasio PL, Muggeo VMR, Buscemi S, Arcara M, Matranga S, Di Vita G (2005) Improvement of wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized study of Botulinum toxin injection. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2173–2179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patti R, Arcara M, Padronaggio D, Bonventre S, Angileri M, Salerno R, Romano P, Buscemi S, Di Vita G (2005) The effectiveness of the topical use of 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate to decrease post-hemorrhoidectomy pain and to improve wounds healing. Chir Ital 57:77–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST), grants 2003–2004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaetano Di Vita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patti, R., Almasio, P.L., Arcara, M. et al. Long-term manometric study of anal sphincter function after hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 22, 253–257 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0174-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0174-x

Keywords

Navigation