Abstract
Objective
Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection have been described with various frequencies in the literature. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the baseline preoperative voiding and sexual function in a cohort of patients undergoing deep rectal resection with mesorectal excision to determine any pre-existing abnormalities. Postoperatively, we sought first to determine the frequency of a urinary or sexual dysfunction, secondly whether there is a time-dependent change of a dysfunction and thirdly whether there is a relationship between postoperative urological dysfunction and the patient’s age.
Patients and methods
Fifty-two patients (36 men and 16 women) with a primary rectal carcinoma were prospectively examined directly before and after the operation, as well after the third and sixth postoperative month. The preoperative urological evaluation consisted of a careful voiding and sexual history, uroflowmetry and a sonographic residual urine determination. A detailed sexual history was obtained via the use of a questionnaire.
Results
Urological dysfunction: Preoperatively, 49 of the 52 patients had a completely normal bladder function and three patients had post void residual >100 ml. Postoperatively, 12 of the 49 patients with normal preoperatively urinary function had voiding dysfunction, but only four male patients had residual urine in the third postoperative month. Therefore, in about 90% of the patients, postoperative bladder function became normal and only 10% suffered from vesical denervation after 6 months. We could not determine a relationship between the degree of bladder dysfunction and the patient’s age due to a relatively small patient cohort in this study. Sexual dysfunction: Preoperatively, 36 (seven women, 29 men) of the 52 patients were potent and had regular sexual intercourse. Eleven men specified a limited erection, but all had occasional sexual intercourse. One of the potent men experienced no ejaculation. Postoperatively, eight of the 29 men were impotent and two of the 29 men experienced retrograde ejaculation. Therefore, 30% of the preoperatively potent men had sexual dysfunction postoperatively. There was no correlation between the postoperative impotence and the age of the patients at the time of surgery. Although it is likely that the potency may diminish with advanced age, the incidence of impotence was not higher in the older patients of our study.
Conclusions
The results of our study underline the importance of risk estimation for possible postoperative urological dysfunction by means of preoperative urologic evaluation in this patient collective. Of patients with postoperative bladder dysfunction, 90% improved within 6 months after surgery and only 10% continued to have bladder dysfunction beyond 6 months, indicating irreversible nerve damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruch H-P, Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Roblick UJ (1999) Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph-node dissection in colorectal cancer. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 384:167–175
Hidenobu M, Hideyuki I, Shigeki Y, Shigeo O, Hiroshi S (1996) Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 10:1140–1145
Lue TF (1991) Impotence after radical pelvic surgery: physiology and management. Urol Int 46:259–265
Gerstenberg TC, Nielsen N, Clausen S, Blaabjberg J, Lindenberg J (1980) Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Ann Surg 191:81–86
Hellström P (1988) Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectosigmoid surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 77:51–56
Leveckis J, Boucher NR, Parys BT, Reed MW, Shorthouse AJ, Anderson JB (1995) Bladder and erectile dysfunction before and after rectal surgery for cancer. Br J Urol 76:752–756
Abrahams P, Blaivas G, Stanton S, Andersen J (1988) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 114:5–19
Havenga K, Enker WE, McDermott K, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Guillem J (1996) Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 182:495–502
Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, Kiebert GM, Klein Kranenbarg WM, van de Velde C (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97
Maurer CA, Z’Graggen K, Renzulli P, Schilling MK, Netzer P, Buchler MW (1999) Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional rectal cancer surgery.Br J Surg 88(11):1501–1515
Stelzner F, Fritsch H, Fleischhauer K (1989) Die chirurgische Anatomie der Genitalnerven des Mannes und ihre Schonung bei der Exzision des Rektums. Chirurg 60:228–234
Porst H, Altwein JE, Mayer R (1984) Erektions- und Ejakulationsstörungen nach retroperitonealer Lymphadenektomie beim nicht-seminomatösen Hodentumor. Urologe 23:324
Lue TF, Schmidt A, Tanagho EA (1985) Electrostimulation and penile erection. Urol Int 40:60–64
Williams NS, Johnston D (1983) The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 70:460–462
Cosimelli M, Mannella E, Gianarelli D (1995) Nerve-sparing surgery in 302 resectable rectosigmoid cancer patients: genitourinary morbidity and 10-year survival. Dis Colon Rectum 37:542–546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sterk, P., Shekarriz, B., Günter, S. et al. Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection and total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 20, 423–427 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0711-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0711-4