Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most patients with idiopathic constipation achieve daily voluntary bowel movements with stimulant laxatives after a “Structured Bowel Management Program” (BMP). A small percentage require rectal enemas. One week in a BMP to find the right enema recipe results in a success rate great than 95%. Once the enema is radiologically and clinically effective, antegrade continent enema procedures (ACE) can afford patients an alternative route of enema administration. This study summarized the outcomes of children with idiopathic constipation who receive antegrade enemas (AE) with or without a prior BMP.

Methods

This was a single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with idiopathic constipation who underwent ACE procedures indicated by different providers from 2015-2020. We categorized the outcomes with AE after the ACE procedure as: “successful outcome” when the AE produced a daily bowel movement, no involuntary bowel movements, and no more fecal impactions, “unsuccessful outcome” was defined when the patient continued having involuntary bowel movements or fecal impaction requiring cleanouts despite a daily AE, and “unnecessary outcome” was defined when the patient was no longer doing AE, but had daily bowel movements, and no involuntary bowel movements or fecal impactions.

Results

Thirty-eight children with idiopathic constipation had an ACE. The most frequent indication for ACE was a failure of medical treatment. The most common medical treatment was polyethylene glycol. Before ACE, 34 (89%) patients did not have a BMP; 18 patients were on rectal enemas and 16 on laxatives. All four with BMP (100%) had a successful rectal enema. After ACE, 12 (31%) patients had successful antegrade enemas, including the four with previous successful BMP with rectal enemas. Twenty patients (52%) had unsuccessful antegrade enemas, and in 6 (15%), the ACE was unnecessary (Fig. 1).

Conclusion

Using antegrade enemas without a previously successful formula for rectal enemas has resulted in a high rate of unsuccessful and unnecessary procedures. BMP for children with idiopathic constipation who needs rectal enemas offers a high possibility to find the proper rectal enema recipe and ensures higher rates of successful AE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bischoff A, Brisighelli G, Dickie B, Frischer J, Levitt MA, Peña A (2018) Idiopathic constipation: a challenging but manageable problem. J Pediatr Surg 53(9):1742–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levitt MA, Pena A (2005) Surgery and constipation: when, how, yes, or no? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41(Suppl. 1):S58-60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pena A, Levitt MA (2002) Colonic inertia disorders in pediatrics. Curr Probl Surg 39:666–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christison-Lagay ER, Rodriguez L, Kurtz M, St Pierre K, Doody DP, Goldstein AM (2010) Antegrade colonic enemas and intestinal diversion are highly effective in the management of children with intractable constipation. J Pediatr Surg 45:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Loening-Baucke V (1993) Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment, and longterm follow up. Gut 34(10):1400–1404. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.34.10.1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Judd-Glossy L, Ariefdjohan M, Ketzer J, Curry S, Schletker J, Edmonds T, Krause A, Simmons H, Pena A, De La Torre L, Bischoff A (2021) Analysis of patients’ and caregivers’ psychosocial functioning in colorectal conditions: comparison of diagnosis, gender, and developmental functioning. Pediatr Surg Int 37(4):437–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04836-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajindrajith S, Devanarayana NM (2011) Constipation in children: novel insight into epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 17:35–47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cascio S, Flett ME, De la Hunt M, Barrett AM, Jaffray B (2004) MACE or caecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 20(7):484–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1220-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siminas S, Losty PD (2015) Current surgical management of pediatric idiopathic constipation: a systematic review of published studies. Ann Surg 262(6):925–933. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De la Torre L, Cogley K, Cabrera-Hernández MA, Frias-Mantilla JE, Wehrli LA (2019) Transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy a new operation for severe chronic idiopathic constipation associated with megarectosigmoid. J Pediatr Surg 54(11):2311–2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoo AK, Askouni E, Basson S, Ng J, Cleeve S (2017) How long will I have my ACE? The natural history of the antegrade continence enema stoma in idiopathic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 33(11):1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4128-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Bauer C, Jackson L, Holder M, Peña A (2009) Treatment of fecal incontinence with a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg 44(6):1278–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brophy S, Brennan K, Woodgate E, Pinaud B, McLaughlin E, Gillespie J, Grover Z, Blackmore C, Romao RL (2022) Comparing quality of life improvement after antegrade continence enema (ACE) therapy for patients with organic and functional constipation/encopresis. J Pediatr Surg 57(5):855–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.12.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng LS, Goldstein AM (2018) SurgicalManagement of Idiopathic Constipation in Pediatric Patients. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 31(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1609023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li C, Shanahan S, Livingston MH, Walton JM (2018) Malone appendicostomy versus cecostomy tube insertion for children with intractable constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 53(5):885–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos-Jasso KA, Arredondo-García JL, Maza-Vallejos J, Lezama-Del VP (2017) Effectiveness of senna vs polyethylene glycol as laxative therapy in children with constipation related to anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 52(1):84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffray B (2009) What happens to children with idiopathic constipation who receive an antegrade continent enema? An actuarial analysis of 80 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Surg 44(2):404–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez L, Nurko S, Flores A (2013) Factors associated with successful decrease and discontinuation of antegrade continence enemas (ACE) in children with defecation disorders: a study evaluating the effect of ACE on colon motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25(2):140-e81. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MLR, AB, and LDLT were responsible for study design. MLR, MMN, and JS were responsible for data collection. EC was responsible for data analysis. MLR and LDLT wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis De la Torre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reppucci, M.L., Nolan, M.M., Cooper, E. et al. The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 1729–1736 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05214-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05214-y

Keyword

Navigation